Jump to content

Eurogamer: Google and Xbox just started the next platform war And this one will be different.


Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Beta Bux Romeo said:

So MS will release a brick with no exclusives. Do you even realize how unappealing this sounds.

Guess you missed the part where they have more 1st party studios than Sony does 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Because PSNOW will probably be absolutely secondary to hardware even if they have a stream box. PSnow will never have the infrastructure because setting all this shit costs tens of billions, and due t

Psnow was just a cheap way to do BC. Google and MS are investing lots of money and resources to deliver a near-flawless experience. 

24 minutes ago, Goukosan said:

people will purchase and Xbox to play games that they can play on their smartphone :grimaceleft:

Yes people will use their phone as a main gaming platform lmao 

Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Beta Bux Romeo said:

Sony opened up 3 VR studios in one year alone, expanded Guerilla into a two game studio from one, open up an AAA budget studio to take over Uncharted. Santa Monica will expand to handle God of War 2 and a new Cory Balrog IP.

 

That's literally 6 new game teams in one year, and thats what we alone.

And that's what we alone ? 

 

Counting VR studios lmao . That's a difference console .

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Beta Bux Romeo said:

XBox on Switch will do MAJOR damage to the XBox hardware. If they go the full distance with PS5, the XBox will merely be a transition brick before streaming can take off.

 

Lemmings are in a cognitive disonnance again if hardware or streaming matters more. Phil fucked them good. God bless him

What are the negatives ? People who still want the most powerful game box can buy an Xbox .

And people who want to stream games on tablets and phones can do so .

 

Ms wants you to subscribe to the service .  . They don't care where you do it .

 

You're an idiot lol 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Jon2B said:

What are the negatives ? People who still want the most powerful game box can buy an Xbox .

And people who want to stream games on tablets and phones can do so .

 

Ms wants you to subscribe to the service .  . They don't care where you do it .

 

You're an idiot lol 

People want the box with exclusives you delusional fuck, especially if it's cheaper.

Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Beta Bux Romeo said:

People want the box with exclusives you delusional fuck, especially if it's cheaper.

The box isn't what Ms cares about . The box is there for userbase . What Ms is doing is gaining a much bigger userbase for the people that don't want to buy a 400 500 dollar box .

 

Nobody is making much money off the box . They make money on the software sold for that box .

 

Are you really this stupid ?

Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, Jon2B said:

The box isn't what Ms cares about . The box is there for userbase . What Ms is doing is gaining a much bigger userbase for the people that don't want to buy a 400 500 dollar box .

 

Nobody is making much money off the box . They make money on the software sold for that box .

 

Are you really this stupid ?

More Boxes sold = more software sold.

 

How can you not see that? Seriously.. are you that dense? 

 

Of course they cared about userbase... userbase of XB1 hardware drives software sales, XBL subs, Gamepass subs etc. 

 

Aza is right.... Lemmings have gone full on delusional.

Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, -GD- said:

their last games were terrible. 

Idk about that . Campaign wise they weren't the best , but they were still pretty good .

Halo 5 mp is the best Halo mp has ever been . And gears mp is gears mp and having that at 60fps for the first thing was pretty cool thing .

 

Not being the best campaign in the franchise doesn't mean the games are dead 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Jon2B said:

Idk about that . Campaign wise they weren't the best , but they were still pretty good .

Halo 5 mp is the best Halo mp has ever been . And gears mp is gears mp and having that at 60fps for the first thing was pretty cool thing .

 

Not being the best campaign in the franchise doesn't mean the games are dead 

eh i'll give you that. i didn't do the multiplayer, but both underwhelmed with their campaigns. i hope MS can get some memorable campaigns again. gears 1/halo 1 were  godly. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...