54212 432 Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 13 hours ago, McWicked said: Not entirely true. Pepsi screwed the pooch because of how they approached the subject. It was tone-deaf. Nike, on the other hand, hired Kaepernick and that ad cost them in the short term, then grew their base in the long term: https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/321130 Nike's stock is down since the ad began airing on September 4th. Link to post Share on other sites
McWicked 825 Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 1 hour ago, Saucer said: Nike's stock is down since the ad began airing on September 4th. Everyone's stock is down. There's a trade war going on. Did you miss the shitshow over Christmas? Up, down, down, way up, way down, etc. Link to post Share on other sites
54212 432 Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 30 minutes ago, McWicked said: Everyone's stock is down. There's a trade war going on. Did you miss the shitshow over Christmas? Up, down, down, way up, way down, etc. You claimed that Nike grew their base as a result of the ad campaign and cited an article that solely used Nike's stock price as evidence that it had. In reality Nike's stock price is down since the ad aired. Once again you're talking out of your ass. Link to post Share on other sites
McWicked 825 Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 2 minutes ago, Saucer said: You claimed that Nike grew their base as a result of the ad campaign and cited an article that solely used Nike's stock price as evidence that it had. In reality Nike's stock price is down since the ad aired. Once again you're talking out of your ass. Stock price =/= base, slick. Link to post Share on other sites
54212 432 Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 (edited) 3 minutes ago, McWicked said: Stock price =/= base, slick. You cited an article that solely cited Nike's stock price as its evidence, Corky. Edited January 15, 2019 by Saucer Link to post Share on other sites
McWicked 825 Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 1 minute ago, Saucer said: You cited an article that solely cited Nike's stock price as its evidence, Corky. Lemme get this straight: you're suggesting that after the ad rose their stock to an all-time high in September, it then tanked their stock to where it is now? Is that about right? No external factor to take into account here? Link to post Share on other sites
54212 432 Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 2 minutes ago, McWicked said: Lemme get this straight: you're suggesting that after the ad rose their stock to an all-time high in September, it then tanked their stock to where it is now? Is that about right? No external factor to take into account here? It rose by $5 the month before the ad was released, and rose by another $5 the month after the ad was released. It rose no higher and then fell. It appears the add had little to no affect on Nike's stock price. You're talking out of your ass again. Link to post Share on other sites
54212 432 Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 (edited) A mediocre cis white man trying to mansplain how advertising works even though he has no background in advertising and failing badly. LOL talk about toxic masculinity. Edited January 15, 2019 by Saucer Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. House 3,371 Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 I don't think I ever seen any company who went woke and actually financially benefited from it. The movies pushing their agenda on the forefront are tanking (see ghostbusters for example) , SJW video games are selling less than previous entries, the Oscars is at an all time low, even the NFL was negatively affected when they did the drop on your knee thing. It's not even the message that is the issue, people don't want their entertainment to become politicized. Who would have thunk it. Just sell your fucking shit products, just make good entertainment. No one cares about getting talked down to by Meryl Streep. Link to post Share on other sites
54212 432 Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 The biggest mistake the Gillette ad makes is scolding its audience. Nike's Kap ad was at least intended to uplift its audience. Who wants be scolded by a razor company about intersectional feminist conspiracy theories? It's just bizarre. Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. House 3,371 Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 2 minutes ago, Saucer said: The biggest mistake the Gillette ad makes is scolding its audience. Nike's Kap ad was at least intended to uplift its audience. Who wants be scolded by a razor company about intersectional feminist conspiracy theories? It's just bizarre. It's actively against it's core consumer base. It's absolutely retarded. That would be like McDonalds trying to shame fat people. 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites
kokujin 558 Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 5 hours ago, Saucer said: Nike's stock is down since the ad began airing on September 4th. What happened September 28th in relevance to Nike? Why does a stock Plummet like hell like that? Just curious do we all ever know why a stock tanks or not. I just know lately everything's been sanking, thanks to Donald Jr. And that's cool. Maybe I should buy some nike and amd stocks now. Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,222 Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 (edited) 4 hours ago, Saucer said: It rose by $5 the month before the ad was released, and rose by another $5 the month after the ad was released. It rose no higher and then fell. It appears the add had little to no affect on Nike's stock price. You're talking out of your ass again. You just tried insinuating the very opposite and say that their stock went down since the ad aired. Therefore the ad primarily to blame. Now, we all know you won't actually commit to that because its a weak argument to make. The stock did continue rising steadily until the beginning of October. 3 weeks of an advertising campaign is a sufficient measurement of its effectiveness. The advertising clearly did not hurt the company. On September 22nd, China and US abruptly end their trade negotiations with one another. On September 24th, the US adds a third round of tariffs, greatly increasing the amount of goods. They go from existing tariffs on $50 Billion worth of goods to expanding it to $250 Billion. How do you think the shareholders of a company who predominantly makes their product in China are going to respond after September 24th? Edited January 15, 2019 by jehurey Link to post Share on other sites
SheepKilla 473 Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 1 hour ago, kokujin said: What happened September 28th in relevance to Nike? Why does a stock Plummet like hell like that? Just curious do we all ever know why a stock tanks or not. I just know lately everything's been sanking, thanks to Donald Jr. And that's cool. Maybe I should buy some nike and amd stocks now. Stocks are all correlated. If the broader market goes down, so will most individual stocks. Sep 28 was around when everything began plunging. Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 2,606 Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 Lol McWeak got owned out of the thread Link to post Share on other sites
kokujin 558 Posted January 15, 2019 Share Posted January 15, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, SheepKilla said: Stocks are all correlated. If the broader market goes down, so will most individual stocks. Sep 28 was around when everything began plunging. sweeet. thanks for the info. as for Saucy, Nike stocks actually climbed 3 weeks further after the ad. Don't think the ad hurt them at all. Now / then in gneeral with the market plummeting has been a goodtime for anyone to pick upstocks. **when a bunch of people buy a stock, does the price/value of it go down? **when a bunch of people sell let go a stock, does the price / value of it go down? Edited January 15, 2019 by kokujin Link to post Share on other sites
54212 432 Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 19 hours ago, jehurey said: You just tried insinuating... No I didn't. And you smell. Get a job. Stop being a disappointment to your mom. Link to post Share on other sites
54212 432 Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 18 hours ago, kokujin said: as for Saucy, Nike stocks actually climbed 3 weeks further after the ad. Don't think the ad hurt them at all. That's what I said. On 2019-01-15 at 5:46 AM, Saucer said: It appears the ad had little to no affect on Nike's stock price. Link to post Share on other sites
McWicked 825 Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 On 2019-01-15 at 7:46 AM, Saucer said: It rose by $5 the month before the ad was released, and rose by another $5 the month after the ad was released. It rose no higher and then fell. It appears the add had little to no affect on Nike's stock price. You're talking out of your ass again. We've moved from "it was bad" to "it had no effect". Link to post Share on other sites
McWicked 825 Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 18 hours ago, Jon2B said: Lol McWeak got owned out of the thread If you shave with Gillette, you'll turn into the big gay. They're coming for you, Slow Johnny. They're coming for you and they're gonna make you into an LGBTQIA+ member and there's nothing you can do about it. Deep State Gillette. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts