Why are the left biology deniers and the right climate change deniers?

[Spicalicious 128]

19 hours ago, Cookester15 said:

You are too complacent 

Either too complacent or just agrees with the other side so his complaint about you complaining is a veiled defense of sjw culture.  

Edited January 15, 2019 by S#$@%^i

[JonDnD 2,618]

50 minutes ago, ghostz said:

I’m a centralist on climate change as wel. Go figure. There are idiots on both sides. 

 

The world is going through a scheduled warming phase however there have never been as many humans on the planet while this occurred. So I think it’s great (but perhaps not even needed) to take caution on it, but even if it wasn’t just a phase, we aren’t going to see our lifetimes affected.  Me personally? I say bring it out. I’d prefer Pittsburgh to have 40-60 degree winters. 

 

Selfish attitudes FTW as I petal to the metal

It has been pretty warm up until like a week ago . I was like yeah global warming ! Then we're supposed to get a foot of snow Saturday . Meh 

[JonDnD 2,618]

Alt left sides with the alt left regardless of the matter . They are the biggest hypocrites and are just generally dumb and weak . And hateful and angry .

[kokujin 558]

I respect you morest for being the gays. Trannie men are a bit fucking much!! A very gross too.

[Tears of the Cows 1,207]

42 minutes ago, jehurey said:

LOL, there is no "centralist" position on science-based issues.

 

You're basically saying "I understand the conclusions........but I'm purposely hedging my bets."

 

You either believe the science or you don't.  It seems like the only people who ASSIGNED liberals as being "left" on the climate change issue or people who just don't want to acknowledge the scientific consensus.

 

I need to find the article. People who go around calling themselves "centrists"............are weak people who exhibit no real leadership qualities.

 

They order the SAFE food on the restaurant menu.........and pretend that they know food better than everybody else. If you come across an issue and  primarily mentality is "I'm purposely going to find the center point", you are doing it wrong.

Scientifically we are entering a known phase of the earth. Scientifically we have never been in this type of phase of the earth with the population we currently have. 

 

^both facts, anything else is speculation 

[Tears of the Cows 1,207]

10 minutes ago, Jon2B said:

Alt left sides with the alt left regardless of the matter . They are the biggest hypocrites and are just generally dumb and weak . And hateful and angry .

Same with the right alt. The right alt and the left alt are basically the same people with opposite ideas. Not much else, they’d probably all be friends if they didn’t know their political stance. 

[kokujin 558]

Ghosts is gonna petal somewhere.

 

 

 

Petal. 

[jehurey 3,230]

1 minute ago, ghostz said:

Scientifically we are entering a known phase of the earth. Scientifically we have never been in this type of phase of the earth with the population we currently have. 

 

^both facts, anything else is speculation 

But you just completely undermined your own viewpoint.

 

If we know that the Earth's population is only going in one direction, and we know what the Earth can and cannot sustain.........please provide me the scenario where NOTHING BAD happens?

 

You're trying to play stupid. All you are saying is that the AMOUNT of harm to the environment cannot be exactly know, and is "therefore only speculation"

 

You didn't disprove the scenario of harm to the environment, did you?

 

There's no point in trying to sound smart when you are still attempting to say nothing.

[JonDnD 2,618]

2 minutes ago, ghostz said:

Same with the right alt. The right alt and the left alt are basically the same people with opposite ideas. Not much else, they’d probably all be friends if they didn’t know their political stance. 

Absolutely. Both shit groups .

[Tears of the Cows 1,207]

16 minutes ago, jehurey said:

But you just completely undermined your own viewpoint.

 

If we know that the Earth's population is only going in one direction, and we know what the Earth can and cannot sustain.........please provide me the scenario where NOTHING BAD happens?

 

You're trying to play stupid. All you are saying is that the AMOUNT of harm to the environment cannot be exactly know, and is "therefore only speculation"

 

You didn't disprove the scenario of harm to the environment, did you?

 

There's no point in trying to sound smart when you are still attempting to say nothing.

That last sentence of yours describes your post. 

 

And Jerry, since you know, what is going to happen? I’d LOVE to know. 

[Tears of the Cows 1,207]

20 minutes ago, kokujin said:

Ghosts is gonna petal somewhere.

 

 

 

Petal. 

Imma flower ur ass into 200 degree farienheint winters

[jehurey 3,230]

2 minutes ago, ghostz said:

That last sentence of yours describes your post. 

 

And Jerry, since you know, what is going to happen? I’d LOVE to know. 

To start off...............you just tried running away from your own post. But I'll get to that later.

 

Yeah, increased population will increase warming and cause erratic changes in climate, which will affect our ability to grow food if we don't have predictable geographical climate data in order to plan on. Food supply is affected, leading to famine and a fight for resources.

 

That qualifies as a NEGATIVE outcome.

 

There you go.

 

You know that this is the outcome, your main complaint is that we can't nail down the specific of when, and by how much.......therefore you try to call it a wash in order to debunk it.

 

So now let's go back to the question I asked you FIRST.......answer it.  Avoid answering it, and you automatically lose.

[Tears of the Cows 1,207]

22 minutes ago, jehurey said:

To start off...............you just tried running away from your own post. But I'll get to that later.

 

Yeah, increased population will increase warming and cause erratic changes in climate, which will affect our ability to grow food if we don't have predictable geographical climate data in order to plan on. Food supply is affected, leading to famine and a fight for resources.

 

That qualifies as a NEGATIVE outcome.

 

There you go.

 

You know that this is the outcome, your main complaint is that we can't nail down the specific of when, and by how much.......therefore you try to call it a wash in order to debunk it.

 

So now let's go back to the question I asked you FIRST.......answer it.  Avoid answering it, and you automatically lose.

Means I lose? I’m not playing a game you fool.  you’re all speculation, if not, post your scientific PROOF bc I’ll easily be able to debunk it

[Tears of the Cows 1,207]

Actually, no, I’d rather hear your take on genders @jehurey

[jehurey 3,230]

1 minute ago, ghostz said:

Means I lose? I’m not playing a game you fool.  you’re all speculation, if not, post your scientific PROOF bc I’ll easily be able to debunk it

You lose.

 

Thanks for playing.

 

Just now, ghostz said:

Actually, no, I’d rather hear your take on genders @jehurey

And tries to run off to another subject...............if that isn't 100% Ghosts, then i don't know what is?

 

C-o-m-p-l-e-t-e

[Tears of the Cows 1,207]

12 minutes ago, jehurey said:

You lose.

 

Thanks for playing.

 

And tries to run off to another subject...............if that isn't 100% Ghosts, then i don't know what is?

 

C-o-m-p-l-e-t-e

*looks at thread title*

 

@Cookester15 maybe we should get jerry outta here since he can’t stick to topics? 

[jehurey 3,230]

4 minutes ago, ghostz said:

*looks at thread title*

 

@Cookester15 maybe we should get jerry outta here since he can’t stick to topics? 

[Looks at your response to my post and what that topic was about.]

 

You lost. And you tried to run away from your own claim.

 

[Tears of the Cows 1,207]

8 minutes ago, jehurey said:

[Looks at your response to my post and what that topic was about.]

 

You lost. And you tried to run away from your own claim.

 

That’s nice. Now what’s your opinion on genders since we know you’re pro cc?

 

@Cookester15 let’s see if he answers

[jehurey 3,230]

5 minutes ago, ghostz said:

That’s nice. Now what’s your opinion on genders since we know you’re pro cc?

 

@Cookester15 let’s see if he answers

So you are saying that a person is banned if they don't answer a question?

 

Because if so.........

[Tears of the Cows 1,207]

27 minutes ago, jehurey said:

So you are saying that a person is banned if they don't answer a question?

 

Because if so.........

@Cookester15 here we have jerry again attempting to derail. We heard his take on climate control, but as you can see, he isn’t willing to discuss the thread subject in here. Time for a vacation where he can go roast in that global warming