DynamiteCop 2,085 Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 1 minute ago, jehurey said: Except the only major differences are swaying of foilage, the quality of the foilage does not seem pereceptible. And the backjground appears darking, but that could be a visual effect like dust and haze moving in between the time he took his screenshots. Its a moving scene. And you had to ISOLATE this specific area in order to get anything perceptible. (in a moving scene). Sweetheart.............YOU are not capable of that perceptibility while playing a video game. Don't bother wasting your time pretending that you are when playing a game on your 4K tv from a regular distance on your couch. LOL You're trash, and blind. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,228 Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 1 minute ago, DynamiteCop! said: You're trash, and blind. No, one of us is actually explaining things............and the other one is just losing their shit in real-time. There's a reason why you didn't bother to compare the FULL screenshot................and you know it, too, sweetcheeks. LOL Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 2,608 Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 Are people actually arguing they can t see the difference ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DynamiteCop 2,085 Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 13 minutes ago, Jon2B said: Are people actually arguing they can t see the difference ? Yes, that is actually happening. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,228 Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 Gee, I wonder if my theory that the particular scene in which those screenshots are taken from is an area that has alot of moving foilage and dust haze moving throughout the background. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 2,608 Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 What screen are you looking at these pictures on Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,228 Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 I like how none of them can even talk about the screens in any detail, about how its different. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lynux3 2,052 Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 Shut the fuck up. It's quite obvious there's a difference. No one is arguing whether or not the difference is more or less noticeable in motion or on a big ass UHD TV. DLSS looks blurrier and obscures some of the details in the native 4K image. The only way to properly do comparisons is by zooming in or comparing the image at native resolution on a monitor that can support it. This is exactly what Digital Foundry does, it's no different. If Digital Foundry came out with a video tomorrow detailing the differences between DLSS and whatever that native 4K image is using or not using and confirmed DLSS looks worse what kind of damage control would you be spewing? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 2,608 Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 All you have to do is look at EVERY oc outlet on YouTube and watch the videos. Maybe Jerry is looking on his switch screen ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,670 Posted February 22, 2019 Author Share Posted February 22, 2019 2 hours ago, Jon2B said: All you have to do is look at EVERY oc outlet on YouTube and watch the videos. Maybe Jerry is looking on his switch screen ? Really? Which ones have updated articles about the DLSS patch that just released? Most of them are from the initial DLSS implementation. And no shit it's going to look worse guys... the fact is... that it doesn't look SO MUCH worse like DramaticCop tries to make it sound, especially at normal viewing distances. I laugh when he does that shit. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,670 Posted February 22, 2019 Author Share Posted February 22, 2019 DLSS before the update: DLSS after update: DLSS off: Just look at the images full screen, not zoomed in or anything. The difference between pre- and post patch is huge obviously... and DLSS off looks a bit crisper... not at all worth 20fps difference.. 20fps by the way... is a gain of almost the amount of fps as the entire game runs on Xbox One X... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Playstation Tablet 1,725 Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 You faggots are arguing about barely noticable differences, in motion it's probably even more irrelevant. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lynux3 2,052 Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 There's no difference, I swearz!!1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,228 Posted February 22, 2019 Share Posted February 22, 2019 11 hours ago, Team 2019 said: You faggots are arguing about barely noticable differences, in motion it's probably even more irrelevant. but 20fps increase is really noticeable. Its these pathetic lemmings who are trying to cling onto "native 4K" of a version of Metro that's fucking running at Medium settings. Like are they honestly proud of that? For me, especially on PC, its always been about graphical settings being turned on as high as possible while achieving the most highest and stable framerate, and since I don't have a variable refresh monitor, that inherently means either at 30fps or 60fps. Resolution ends up being a lower priority. But in the future, having a nVidia video card will help because DLSS can prevent from having to make that compromise. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,670 Posted February 22, 2019 Author Share Posted February 22, 2019 7 hours ago, lynux3 said: There's no difference, I swearz!!1 That was pre-patch.. dumbo. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DynamiteCop 2,085 Posted February 23, 2019 Share Posted February 23, 2019 1 hour ago, Remij_ said: That was pre-patch.. dumbo. Post patch with images supplied by yourself it's still quite visually deteriorated, sure it's an improvement over what was there before but still pretty subpar. It honestly looks as I said, as if they took a game at Ultra and dropped it to Medium and then lowered the resolution. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,670 Posted February 23, 2019 Author Share Posted February 23, 2019 2 hours ago, DynamiteCop! said: Post patch with images supplied by yourself it's still quite visually deteriorated, sure it's an improvement over what was there before but still pretty subpar. It honestly looks as I said, as if they took a game at Ultra and dropped it to Medium and then lowered the resolution. Nah, I disagree. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DynamiteCop 2,085 Posted February 23, 2019 Share Posted February 23, 2019 1 minute ago, Remij_ said: Nah, I disagree. That's great, I wasn't giving an opinion. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,670 Posted February 23, 2019 Author Share Posted February 23, 2019 4 minutes ago, DynamiteCop! said: That's great, I wasn't giving an opinion. Yea you were. A worthless one at that Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DynamiteCop 2,085 Posted February 23, 2019 Share Posted February 23, 2019 1 minute ago, Remij_ said: Yea you were. A worthless one at that It's not worthless and it's not an opinion, it's objective fact. I can clearly and glaringly see the image degradation. You're being beyond delusional right now. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.