Alphonse★ 453 Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 1 minute ago, madmaltese said: There's really no point even discussing anything with you. Some of the things you say are batshit insane. 'Easily explained by easy targets en masse in an isolated space'. FMD that's some reaching. We'll see what you say when there is a retaliatory attack in some Church because of all this. He is in too deep, brah. Like jerry on the other side, it's impossible to have a rational conversation about this subject with them, They're too emotionally invested in this shit. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
madmaltese★ 2,548 Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 1 minute ago, DynamiteCop! said: Well they'll make it pretty clear by screaming Allahu Akbar and then ISIS will immediately claim responsibility for it.. You mean as clear as a 76 page manifesto? Where he literally calls his own act a Terrorist attack..... 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
madmaltese★ 2,548 Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 Just now, Alphonse said: He is in too deep, brah. Like jerry on the other side, it's impossible to have a rational conversation about this subject with them, They're too emotionally invested in this shit. Very true. They are practically the same person. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DynamiteCop 2,084 Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 Just now, madmaltese said: You mean as clear as a 76 page manifesto? Where he literally calls his own act a Terrorist attack..... Did I say this guy wasn't a terrorist? Try to keep up short bus. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
madmaltese★ 2,548 Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 Just now, DynamiteCop! said: Did I say this guy wasn't a terrorist? Try to keep up short bus. Still haven't heard you say it was. Same way you didn't answer when I said give an example of left wing terrorist attack. You just evade and bring out Dyno logic to excuse things. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Teh_Diplomat 2,054 Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 2 minutes ago, madmaltese said: Very true. They are practically the same person. You could say they're two sides of the same coin. 1 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DynamiteCop 2,084 Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 Just now, madmaltese said: Still haven't heard you say it was. Same way you didn't answer when I said give an example of left wing terrorist attack. You just evade and bring out Dyno logic to excuse things. It was and I'm not playing your game where you try to shift the argument. That's not how these things work, I don't have to follow you like a rabbit to a carrot just because you decide to flip the script to something non-pertinent. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
madmaltese★ 2,548 Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 Just now, DynamiteCop! said: It was and I'm not playing your game where you try to shift the argument. That's not how these things work, I don't have to follow you like a rabbit to a carrot just because you decide to flip the script to something non-pertinent. That is quite literally what you're doing. You've ended with your reasoning of those attacks I mentioned not being terrorism because places of worship could 'easily be explained by easy targets en masse in an isolated area'. I'd laugh if it wasn't such a serious topic. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DynamiteCop 2,084 Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 (edited) 2 minutes ago, madmaltese said: That is quite literally what you're doing. You've ended with your reasoning of those attacks I mentioned not being terrorism because places of worship could 'easily be explained by easy targets en masse in an isolated area'. I'd laugh if it wasn't such a serious topic. My point was of these 37 "terrorist" attacks, who were the people and how was it derived that they were right leaning. It's simple. Then you went off into some tangent about "yeah well tell me what leftist attacks there have been"... An absolutely nonsensical tangent with nothing to do with anything. You're the variety of person who when you fail to provide a compelling answer to something you shift the argument into a direction you think you can win. You're a feeble minded idiot. Edited March 16, 2019 by DynamiteCop! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
madmaltese★ 2,548 Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 1 minute ago, DynamiteCop! said: My point was of these 37 "terrorist" attacks, who were the people and how was it derived that they were right leaning. It's simple. Then you went off into some tangent about "yeah well tell me what leftist attacks there have been"... An absolutely nonsensical tangent with nothing to do with anything. No actually I mentioned to you exactly how they were derived. By their targets and you used the most laughable excuse I've ever heard to defend it. I asked you about what left wing attack means to you earlier since you clearly don't know that islamism as an ideology is also right wing in nature. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DynamiteCop 2,084 Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 Just now, madmaltese said: No actually I mentioned to you exactly how they were derived. By their targets and you used the most laughable excuse I've ever heard to defend it. I asked you about what left wing attack means to you earlier since you clearly don't know that islamism as an ideology is also right wing in nature. Who were the people and what were their targets? Also a target does no derive motivation. Even if you were able to answer this (which you're clearly incapable) it wouldn't matter because again; a target does not necessitate motivation. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Teh_Diplomat 2,054 Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 3 minutes ago, madmaltese said: No actually I mentioned to you exactly how they were derived. By their targets and you used the most laughable excuse I've ever heard to defend it. I asked you about what left wing attack means to you earlier since you clearly don't know that islamism as an ideology is also right wing in nature. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TLHBO 2,158 Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/10120347/Drone-victims-radicalised-at-mosque Quote Link to post Share on other sites
54212 432 Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 4 hours ago, madmaltese said: Same way you didn't answer when I said give an example of left wing terrorist attack. 2017 Congressional baseball shooting 2016 Dallas police shooting Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kaz 2,439 Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 so many shootings and my hair cut sucks Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,249 Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 (edited) 6 hours ago, DynamiteCop! said: Absolutely, otherwise it's assumption which could easily be explained by easy targets en masse in an isolated space. Just because someone shoots up a church doesn't mean there's any terrorism derived motivation behind it. I mean for crying out loud when you download the "data" from Gouk's little article you get this... Wow... "could easily be explained by easy targets en masse in an isolated space".... Wow that's a reach that can be used to explain away almost any attack.....Of course Terrorist want easily targets in a confined space... they want to maximize the body count and amplify the Terror..... you block of wood. As far as the data... either you are genuinely retarded or you are being disingenuous as always. They have a case by case break down of all the attacks. go fuck yourself Edited March 16, 2019 by Goukosan Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.