Jump to content

The Lion King Official Trailer


Recommended Posts

  • 3 months later...
On 2019-04-10 at 3:19 PM, Remij_ said:

Looks awful he says :roll: 

 

No shit going with a realistic style means that colors will be muted and characters wont be as expressive..  I guarantee you these will be the most expressive REALISTIC looking lions you've ever seen :roll: 

 

And no, they quite clearly show Scar talking in 2 scenes, and it looked great.. lmao wtf.  

 

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/the_lion_king_2019

 

57% :tom:

 

also looks like i was spot on about the very deliberate style of editing in the trailers that mostly shied away from direct shots of characters speaing, trying to mask the lack of expression, as its cited as a real issue by most critics.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Quad Damage said:

 

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/the_lion_king_2019

 

57% :tom:

 

also looks like i was spot on about the very deliberate style of editing in the trailers that mostly shied away from direct shots of characters speaing, trying to mask the lack of expression, as its cited as a real issue by most critics.

:tom: 

 

Nobody was ever expecting this to be universally praised...  People were just itching to hate on the realistic looking visuals.  "Waaahhh, why doesn't the realistic looking lion animate as expressively as a Disney cartoon?" :cry: 

 

Fucking idiots :hest: 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Remij_ said:

:tom: 

 

Nobody was ever expecting this to be universally praised...  People were just itching to hate on the realistic looking visuals.  "Waaahhh, why doesn't the realistic looking lion animate as expressively as a Disney cartoon?" :cry: 

 

Fucking idiots :hest: 

 

:hest: 

 

this was directed by someone that previously directed another disney remake that was basically universally praised (jungle book). other mediocre disney remakes like beauty and the beast and cinderella managed scores in the 70's/80's. and your incredulous ass was not having even one lone dissenting opinion (mine) itt that this looked awful from the jump.

 

yeah, no, im gonna say, no one including you was ever expecting the praise for this to be near the bottom of disney remakes alongside aladdin and dumbo - except me of course, as usual. :aitch:

Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, Quad Damage said:

 

:hest: 

 

this was directed by someone that previously directed another disney remake that was basically universally praised (jungle book). other mediocre disney remakes like beauty and the beast and cinderella managed scores in the 70's/80's. and your incredulous ass was not having even one lone dissenting opinion (mine) itt that this looked awful from the jump.

 

yeah, no, im gonna say, no one including you was ever expecting the praise for this to be near the bottom of disney remakes alongside aladdin and dumbo - except me of course, as usual. :aitch:

:mj: 

 

Everyone knew there would be backlash to the realism of it.  It's not about the direction... it's about "the realistic bland unexpwessiv animalzz" :cry: 

 

:rofl: 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Remij_ said:

:mj: 

 

Everyone knew there would be backlash to the realism of it.  It's not about the direction... it's about "the realistic bland unexpwessiv animalzz" :cry: 

 

:rofl: 

 

no one knew it would be this awful (again, except me). and again, there have been other realistic looking disney remakes that didnt flop this hard.

 

wrongmij :rofls:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mulan is going to be shit too. They removed all the songs completely as a pretext to not have its most iconic song "I'll make a man out of you" which wouldn't fit in today's sjw cuck world. 

 

Disney :poop:

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is even worse than i thought

 

 

its not just the lack of expressiveness in the animals faces and lack of vibrancy in the bg/color palette, its the filmmaking on the whole thats downgraded. the vocal performance, camera work, and storyboarding of this sequence are just flat and lifeless, with zero visual gags like the original to keep it lively - just one long boring take walking in a straight line.
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Quad Damage said:

this is even worse than i thought

 

 

its not just the lack of expressiveness in the animals faces and lack of vibrancy in the bg/color palette, its the filmmaking on the whole thats downgraded. the vocal performance, camera work, and storyboarding of this sequence are just flat and lifeless, with zero visual gags like the original to keep it lively - just one long boring take walking in a straight line.

lmao that is pretty terrible :ben: 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Those are just bad, unrealistic physics for a young, vibrant lion.  As least make him act like a powerful cat.

 

Also, looking at real videos of lions, you can tell that the back legs feel like they run independently of the front legs, but the CGI makes it look like all the weight in the lion is up in his shoulders. Maybe its because they want to keep the held steady at all times for you to see the mouth movement. He moves like a car inkstand of an animal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...