Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Cookester15

Do you really want another lawyer as president?

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Vini said:

If you look at the charts I posted you would see that NYT covered the ideas of social justice plenty over 2 decades before the explosion of identity politics and woke activism in the mid 2010s. What's your claim exactly, that 5 years ago the world suddenly needed 10 times more social justice coverage? Or is it more likely that the NYT allowed far left activists to take over their publication?

 

No, if society begins using the term more............it will almost assuredly be in quotes and in subjects, and that will be covered by a newspaper who covers CURRENT EVENTS.

 

They cover what is happening............they don't create and tell people "this is what you need to be talking about".

 

That is what you claimed.

 

Its almost as if you don't understand the function of a news outlet. You're blaming them for............covering what is happening, as if its their fault.

 

Think about how stupid that genuinely sounds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, jehurey said:

No, if society begins using the term more............it will almost assuredly be in quotes and in subjects, and that will be covered by a newspaper who covers CURRENT EVENTS.

 

They cover what is happening............they don't create and tell people "this is what you need to be talking about".

 

That is what you claimed.

 

Its almost as if you don't understand the function of a news outlet. You're blaming them for............covering what is happening, as if its their fault.

 

Think about how stupid that genuinely sounds.

 

ah so now the whole society started using the term more forcing poor NYT's hand to blow their coverage of Social Justice and inclusion through the roof.. 

 

How about "whiteness". Did the whole society start using that term too all of a sudden over the last half a decade? Or did a bunch of woke retards with online platforms start obsessing about white privilege and the toxic "whiteness" that led to it? 

 

Edited by Vini

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, Vini said:

 

ah so now the whole society started using the term more forcing poor NYT's hand to blow their coverage of Social Justice and inclusion through the roof.. 

 

How about "whiteness". Did the whole society start using that term too all of a sudden over the last half a decade? Or did a bunch of woke retards with online platforms start obsessing about white privilege and the toxic "whiteness" that led to it? 

 

yeah, they probably did.

 

dude..........you have yet to post a SINGLE ARTICLE that remotely proves your claim. LOL

 

Do you think I haven't noticed this throughout this entire time?:drake:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, jehurey said:

yeah, they probably did.

 

dude..........you have yet to post a SINGLE ARTICLE that remotely proves your claim. LOL

 

Do you think I haven't noticed this throughout this entire time?:drake:

 

I don't have to. I posted data about thousands of articles. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Vini said:

 

I don't have to. I posted data about thousands of articles. 

No you didn't, you posted data on words.

 

If we did an analysis of Fox news using the word "socialism" more and more after 2008 in their reporting..........does that mean that Fox News is PROMOTING socialism????????

 

LOL, that was easy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, jehurey said:

No you didn't, you posted data on words.

 

If we did an analysis of Fox news using the word "socialism" more and more after 2008 in their reporting..........does that mean that Fox News is PROMOTING socialism????????

 

LOL, that was easy.

lmao if the NYT is not promoting social justice you think they're disparaging it? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Vini said:

lmao if the NYT is not promoting social justice you think they're disparaging it? 

Sorry, you don't have prove either way.

 

The ONLY way you could prove this is if you actually show me the content in which we can analyze biased reporting.

 

Let me know when you can get to that point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2019-10-09 at 2:16 PM, jehurey said:

Sorry, you don't have prove either way.

 

The ONLY way you could prove this is if you actually show me the content in which we can analyze biased reporting.

 

Let me know when you can get to that point.

Yeah I'm not digging up 800 articles just to prove a point I proved 5 posts ago just to hear another bad faith argument from you

 

I did wake up to this golden nugget this morning tho

 

 

Questioning authenticity of a female candidate automatically makes you sexist. 

 

:D

 

Edited by Vini

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Vini said:

Yeah I'm not digging up 800 articles just to prove a point I proved 5 posts ago just to hear another bad faith argument from you

 

I did wake up to this golden nugget this morning tho

 

 

Questioning authenticity of a female candidate automatically makes you sexist. 

 

:D

 

If he can prove it with his analysis, then its a supported conclusion for him to make.

 

For example, if you hear the phrase "he's a well-spoken man" mostly when white people are describing black people, and you can find enough examples of this occurring, while also barely find any examples of this occurring when people are describing a white man........then you would have analyzed the issue properly to make such a conclusion.

 

Its not an agenda if you CAN PROVE THE PATTERN. Its just you making a VERIFIABLE observation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, jehurey said:

If he can prove it with his analysis, then its a supported conclusion for him to make.

 

For example, if you hear the phrase "he's a well-spoken man" mostly when white people are describing black people, and you can find enough examples of this occurring, while also barely find any examples of this occurring when people are describing a white man........then you would have analyzed the issue properly to make such a conclusion.

 

Its not an agenda if you CAN PROVE THE PATTERN. Its just you making a VERIFIABLE observation.

 

Lmao and this isn't even an opinion piece

 

Don't criticize female candidates that fake their own ethnicity as inauthentic otherwise you're a sexist

 

New York Times ladies and gentlemen

 

Edited by Vini

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, Vini said:

 

Lmao and this isn't even an opinion piece

 

Don't criticize female candidates that fake their own ethnicity as inauthentic otherwise you're a sexist

 

New York Times ladies and gentlemen

 

I love how you don't actually have a response, and you re-state your belief like as if anybody here is going to pay attention to you. LOL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×