lynux3 2,054 Posted November 22, 2019 Share Posted November 22, 2019 Just now, JONBpc said: Its not misleading, the context is in the thread, and you agree. Ok Dumbo LOL Well, I guess slow johnny gonna slow johnny. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 2,613 Posted November 22, 2019 Author Share Posted November 22, 2019 1 minute ago, lynux3 said: Well, I guess slow johnny gonna slow johnny. Im just posting what a game dev said. Argue with him, not me Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,670 Posted November 22, 2019 Share Posted November 22, 2019 (edited) 10 minutes ago, JONBpc said: I mean he flat out says load times could end up being what they are today. There is nothing to misinterpret. It doesn't matter how "big the games get"... what matters is that there's X amount of RAM and Y speed from the SSD to that memory. You're only ever going to have 20GB (let's say) to fill... so while he's absolutely right that it's possible devs could use the speed as a reason to do less optimization... assuming that the I/O has a bandwidth of 5GB/s-10GB/s.. you're really should only ever need a 2-4 seconds. It's going to be a substantial improvement in every regard. Edited November 22, 2019 by Remij_ Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lynux3 2,054 Posted November 22, 2019 Share Posted November 22, 2019 Just now, JONBpc said: Im just posting what a game dev said. Argue with him, not me What did he say? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JonDnD 2,613 Posted November 22, 2019 Author Share Posted November 22, 2019 1 minute ago, lynux3 said: What did he say? I know Texans have trouble reading, but damn Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,250 Posted November 22, 2019 Share Posted November 22, 2019 1 minute ago, lynux3 said: Well, I guess slow johnny gonna slow johnny. You just triggered him The developer literally said not optimizing content.... slow Jonny misinterprets literal statements Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Remij 4,670 Posted November 22, 2019 Share Posted November 22, 2019 And I just thought I'd mention that loading more often does not mean "longer loading times"... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,250 Posted November 22, 2019 Share Posted November 22, 2019 To put it in terms even slow Jonny can understand......A PS5 with an SSD will be monumentally faster than that same PS5 with an HDD. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lynux3 2,054 Posted November 22, 2019 Share Posted November 22, 2019 Well, to put some context into it, Insomniac Games says Spider-man takes up 5,193MB of memory on PS4. We've seen a live demonstration of next gen PS5 dev kit loading that in roughly ~0.8 seconds. Not sure if the 5.2GB is base or Pro assets, but gives us a rough estimation at how fast it is as loading a scene. I don't think we'll be seeing stupid high load times like we have this generation. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Delita 698 Posted November 23, 2019 Share Posted November 23, 2019 So is Sony not buying remedy??? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DynamiteCop 2,085 Posted November 23, 2019 Share Posted November 23, 2019 44 minutes ago, Delita said: So is Sony not buying remedy??? Remedy is developing a game for Xbox right now, what do you think? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The Mother Fucker 26 Posted November 23, 2019 Share Posted November 23, 2019 Control sucked. I think I liked Gears 5 better, it's story was far more interesting that the cluster fuck Control. Both games had asstastic combat but Controls enemies were the worse. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.