Big Navi to be 80CUs but with lower clocks than Navi 10 according to Chiphell leaker

[JonDnD 2,608]

Still having a 970 lol

[jehurey 3,228]

10 minutes ago, JONBpc said:

Still having a 970 lol

Still more powerful than having dropped another $500 for a XBX, just so that they couldn't even have any exclusives made for it.

 

But it goes to show that I have never been one to buy video cards every couple of years. I don't think its worth it.

 

Which is why I typically wait for the "dollar-to-performance" video card to come out, which is usually about every 4-5 years. Wait for a new architecture, and then wait for either the second-wave, or the third-wave product line refresh when they have perfected the GPU  performance, optimized the performance-per-watt, etc.

Edited January 20, 2020 by jehurey

[JonDnD 2,608]

I'd say its gotta be rough with a 970 now and probably whatever old CPU you have but you dont play games so it's probably not a big deal .

[The Mother Fucker 26]

It can't be that bad with a 970. 

I was able to run GTX 670 FTW 4GB okay last year, in MGPU setup before I gave them away.   Med res at best 60fps 1080p.  I'd imagine a 970 could do High quality pretty well 1080p. 

[jehurey 3,228]

39 minutes ago, JONBpc said:

I'd say its gotta be rough with a 970 now and probably whatever old CPU you have but you dont play games so it's probably not a big deal .

LOL, any Desktop CPU made from 2012 onwards is probably at least 3x more powerful than the XBX that you paid $500 just a couple of years ago.

 

LOLOLOL

 

Go play Witcher 3 on your XBX and run to the center square of Novigrad and tell me how many NPCs are there.

[JonDnD 2,608]

Lmao witcher 3 runs shit on a 970. Show me your PC running Witcher 3 in novigrad.

 

 

[jehurey 3,228]

32 minutes ago, JONBpc said:

Lmao witcher 3 runs shit on a 970. Show me your PC running Witcher 3 in novigrad.

 

 

LOL ok.

 

I count about 60 people.  Man, it really was easy to go into the game, immediately recod, get out of the game, go to youtube, upload it, and grab a link.

 

Just goes to show that its easier with a PC, and when you know what to do.

[DynamiteCop 2,085]

5 minutes ago, jehurey said:

LOL ok.

 

I count about 60 people.  Man, it really was easy to go into the game, immediately recod, get out of the game, go to youtube, upload it, and grab a link.

 

Just goes to show that its easier with a PC, and when you know what to do.

Stuttering audio, hitching and framerate dips. 

 

Edited January 20, 2020 by DynamiteCop!

[jehurey 3,228]

Just now, DynamiteCop! said:

Stuttering audio and framerate dips. 

 

I'm not experiencing that in-game. That's the Xbox Game Bar's recording functionality.

 

I get smooth 60 fps when I'm playing. At 1920 x 1200, no less.

[Sergio Perez SP11 173]

3.5 GB VRAM in 2020  lol

[DynamiteCop 2,085]

6 minutes ago, jehurey said:

I'm not experiencing that in-game. That's the Xbox Game Bar's recording functionality.

 

I get smooth 60 fps when I'm playing. At 1920 x 1200, no less.

Why not use shadowplay? 

[jehurey 3,228]

Just now, DynamiteCop! said:

Why not use shadowplay? 

Just decided to.

 

I love it on PC. Takes me just a few minutes to do everything again, correctly.

 

 

[The Mother Fucker 26]

I'm pretty sure my GTX 670 FTW which packed 4GB of VRAM could run Witcher 3 at HIGH. 

PC hardware for the past 8 years rape consoles. 

 

[PhantomABS 48]

my PC blows your's out of the water

 

https://www.neogaf.com/threads/finally-getting-into-pc-gaming-help-lol.1511620/page-2#post-256565943

Edited January 20, 2020 by PhantomABS

[JonDnD 2,608]

17 hours ago, DynamiteCop! said:

Stuttering audio, hitching and framerate dips. 

 

Lmfao he is bragging about this ? 

[JonDnD 2,608]

I dont see settings or fr counter btw , berry 

[Remij 4,670]

2 hours ago, JONBpc said:

I dont see settings or fr counter btw , berry 

You don't need one to see it takes a shit on X1X there.  There's no chance of reaching anything close to 60fps. 

[JonDnD 2,608]

4 minutes ago, Remij_ said:

You don't need one to see it takes a shit on X1X there.  There's no chance of reaching anything close to 60fps. 

xbx has a 60fps mode that does hit 60fps (sometimes)

 

And an xbx rapes a 970 , shut your dirty mouth.

[Remij 4,670]

42 minutes ago, JONBpc said:

xbx has a 60fps mode that does hit 60fps (sometimes)

 

And an xbx rapes a 970 , shut your dirty mouth.

Dude, X1X runs at 1080p-1300p in "performance mode" and never comes close to 60fps in Novigrad... and has FAR less NPCs.  It's not even a comparison.

 

Not only that... but a GTX970 rapes the X1X in the fact that it doesn't need "enhanced" versions of games to run better.... and then there's the fact that a GTX970 will play PS4 games far better than an X1X will ever be able to LMFAO TCHBR  

[JonDnD 2,608]

10 minutes ago, Remij_ said:

Dude, X1X runs at 1080p-1300p in "performance mode" and never comes close to 60fps in Novigrad... and has FAR less NPCs.  It's not even a comparison.

 

Not only that... but a GTX970 rapes the X1X in the fact that it doesn't need "enhanced" versions of games to run better.... and then there's the fact that a GTX970 will play PS4 games far better than an X1X will ever be able to LMFAO TCHBR  

"In novigrad" That's why im asking for FPS counter and specs. 970 stuggles in Witcher 3 without some cuts. There have been a few parts where my 2060 drops under 60fps.

 

Xbox resolution mode slaps a 970, and XBX in general wrecks a 970.

 

The rest of your post is too stupid to comment on, RTX FLOPPED