DynamiteCop 2,085 Posted March 19, 2020 Share Posted March 19, 2020 (edited) Is it actually 5GB/s or are they not telling the whole story? Microsoft gave two numbers, 2.4GB/s and 4.8GB/s compressed. Is that 5GB/s the actual throughput or its peak compressed throughput? Edited March 19, 2020 by DynamiteCop! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kaz 2,439 Posted March 19, 2020 Share Posted March 19, 2020 you should watch the mark cerny show, he explains it in detail Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,227 Posted March 19, 2020 Share Posted March 19, 2020 (edited) Wha? They literally gave both numbers. 5.5GB/s raw, 8-9GB/s compressed. he even said 2GBs is transferred in 0.27 seconds. Its straight 2x faster data loading than the MS console. Edited March 19, 2020 by jehurey Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DynamiteCop 2,085 Posted March 19, 2020 Author Share Posted March 19, 2020 Just now, jehurey said: Wha? They literally gave both numbers. 5.5GB/s raw, 8-9GB/s compressed. Its straight 2x faster data loading than the MS console. I watched it while driving, I didn't see everything. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Spicalicious 128 Posted March 19, 2020 Share Posted March 19, 2020 4 minutes ago, jehurey said: Wha? They literally gave both numbers. 5.5GB/s raw, 8-9GB/s compressed. he even said 2GBs is transferred in 0.27 seconds. Its straight 2x faster data loading than the MS console. Missing those TF tho Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,249 Posted March 19, 2020 Share Posted March 19, 2020 14 minutes ago, DynamiteCop! said: Is it actually 5GB/s or are they not telling the whole story? Microsoft gave two numbers, 2.4GB/s and 4.8GB/s compressed. Is that 5GB/s the actual throughput or its peak compressed throughput? 5GB/S and 9GB/s compressed. It's basically 2X what Xsex has... that's a huge difference Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DynamiteCop 2,085 Posted March 19, 2020 Author Share Posted March 19, 2020 43 minutes ago, Goukosan said: 5GB/S and 9GB/s compressed. It's basically 2X what Xsex has... that's a huge difference Well is it though? I mean if Microsoft's system is already loading things up near or instantaneously wouldn't that basically just be clout for the sake of clout and not actually a useful performance figure? It's 2x faster, but what does that actually mean in all reality? 2x faster relative to something that's already insanely fast seems like a gigantic diminished return. @Remij_ Curious what you think about this as well. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,249 Posted March 19, 2020 Share Posted March 19, 2020 (edited) 7 minutes ago, DynamiteCop! said: Well is it though? I mean if Microsoft's system is already loading things up near or instantaneously wouldn't that basically just be clout for the sake of clout and not actually a useful performance figure? It's 2x faster, but what does that actually mean in all reality? 2x faster relative to something that's already insanely fast seems like a gigantic diminished return. @Remij_ Curious what you think about this as well. It's not just for increasing the loading speed of games. This will be applicable to gameplay as well. Edited March 19, 2020 by Goukosan Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DynamiteCop 2,085 Posted March 19, 2020 Author Share Posted March 19, 2020 1 minute ago, Goukosan said: It's not just for increasing the loading speed of games. This will be applicable to gameplay as well. I'd like the actually see some kind of appreciable metric to how this could actually provide some real benefit, it's all loading in the end. Those numbers while far above Microsoft's might not translate into much in the end. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,249 Posted March 19, 2020 Share Posted March 19, 2020 1 minute ago, DynamiteCop! said: I'd like the actually see some kind of appreciable metric to how this could actually provide some real benefit, it's all loading in the end. Those numbers while far above Microsoft's might not translate into much in the end. Not translate to much? bigger worlds, more dynamic worlds, more detailed worlds etc.... that's considered not much now? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DynamiteCop 2,085 Posted March 19, 2020 Author Share Posted March 19, 2020 Just now, Goukosan said: Not translate to much? bigger worlds, more dynamic worlds, more detailed worlds etc.... that's considered not much now? You're not understanding this, I feel like i'm talking to a moron. There might be a limitation of appreciable effect that this can actually assert in a practical environment. Microsoft's SSD might be fast enough to tackle anything thrown at it as it stands so doubling up its effective speed would in essence do absolutely nothing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
madmaltese★ 2,550 Posted March 19, 2020 Share Posted March 19, 2020 2 minutes ago, Goukosan said: Not translate to much? bigger worlds, more dynamic worlds, more detailed worlds etc.... that's considered not much now? You're talking to the guy that use to argue about 20% resolution bumps and 'true 4k' and how sony's use checkerboarding even when Sony's first party still looked better to the naked eye than anything on X Now he's all like 'won't translate to much'. lol This SSD has actual in game use other than just a resolution bump. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DynamiteCop 2,085 Posted March 19, 2020 Author Share Posted March 19, 2020 1 minute ago, madmaltese said: You're talking to the guy that use to argue about 20% resolution bumps and 'true 4k' and how sony's use checkerboarding even when Sony's first party still looked better to the naked eye than anything on X Now he's all like 'won't translate to much'. lol This SSD has actual in game use other than just a resolution bump. You're just as stupid as that bumbling fucking idiot. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Quad Damage 1,717 Posted March 19, 2020 Share Posted March 19, 2020 basically think the og xbox versions of splinter cell and max payne vs the ps2 versions, where the xbox levels were larger and more seamless, and the ps2 versions were a segmented mess with loading. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lostfool 680 Posted March 19, 2020 Share Posted March 19, 2020 Lmao the so the Xbox X has a naturally aspirated v6 that you would find in a shitty V6 mustang and the PS5 is a a twin turbo beast that you would find in a Nissan GTR XboxX is a mistake Quote Link to post Share on other sites
madmaltese★ 2,550 Posted March 19, 2020 Share Posted March 19, 2020 3 minutes ago, DynamiteCop! said: You're just as stupid as that bumbling fucking idiot. Considering you are the resident SW idiot, acknowledged by all to be so and with more evidence stockpiled up in this forum of your stupidity than a Doomsday prepper stockpiling from Covid, it is a compliment that our opinion differs from yours. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DynamiteCop 2,085 Posted March 19, 2020 Author Share Posted March 19, 2020 1 minute ago, Quad Damage said: basically think the og xbox versions of splinter cell and max payne vs the ps2 versions, where the xbox levels were larger and more seamless, and the ps2 versions were a segmented mess with loading. That won't even remotely be the case, Sony architected themselves out of the sphere of appreciable effect. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DynamiteCop 2,085 Posted March 19, 2020 Author Share Posted March 19, 2020 Just now, madmaltese said: Considering you are the resident SW idiot, acknowledged by all to be so and with more evidence stockpiled up in this forum of your stupidity than a Doomsday prepper stockpiling from Covid, it is a compliment that our opinion differs from yours. You don't have an opinion because your brain isn't capable of putting together a rational point that could even be considered one. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
madmaltese★ 2,550 Posted March 19, 2020 Share Posted March 19, 2020 Just now, DynamiteCop! said: You don't have an opinion because your brain isn't capable of putting together a rational point that could even be considered one. 100% correct prediction of PS5 specs. Not a single post ever saying it was more than Series X or 13TF Spotless record for so Next one will be true also. Will have a better launch window too. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
102020393023445948594 2,223 Posted March 19, 2020 Share Posted March 19, 2020 7 minutes ago, lostfool said: Lmao the so the Xbox X has a naturally aspirated v6 that you would find in a shitty V6 mustang and the PS5 is a a twin turbo beast that you would find in a Nissan GTR XboxX is a mistake Xbox Sucky's X is more like a v6 CHallenger, heavy as a boat and all show, no go. A Honda Accord outruns those things lmfao Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.