DynamiteCop 2,085 Posted July 5, 2020 Share Posted July 5, 2020 2 minutes ago, jehurey said: Except the LED do not directly LIGHT the panel front BEHIND the panel like an ACTUAL BACKLIGHT would do. That's why its called EDGE light. The actual light coming from the back is being redirected by the DIffusion Filter sheet and the reflector panel. And you know damn well that this is a different type of lighting that is INFERIOR to what REAL backlighting is. Dude.............you need to stop playing stupid. You own a CHEAPER FORM OF LIGHTING on your television, probably the BEST edge-lit television that anybody could make. But actual back-lit displays where the LEDs are DIRECTLY behind the LCD are a different technology. They're not the same. It doesn't matter HOW it's happening, it's still back lighting the LCD panel... It's backlit... Holy shit... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,228 Posted July 5, 2020 Share Posted July 5, 2020 10 minutes ago, lynux3 said: 19 minutes ago, jehurey said: Cars classify engines by HORSEPOWER.................so cars are using HORSES, right? I mean if that what they put as the header of that column............then it must be true, right? That's last sentence is the chokehold in that gif. lnyxu won't be able to get out of it. All I hear are taps and wheels spinning. Wheels powered by horses, obviously. LOL Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lynux3 2,052 Posted July 5, 2020 Share Posted July 5, 2020 Just now, jehurey said: All I hear are taps and wheels spinning. Wheels powered by horses, obviously. LOL Sony Samsung LG Vizio You can't make this shit up. Jerry is that stupid. jerry Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,228 Posted July 5, 2020 Share Posted July 5, 2020 (edited) 14 minutes ago, DynamitCop! ALM said: It doesn't matter HOW it's happening, it's still back lighting the LCD panel... It's backlit... Holy shit... No, it does matter. Not to mention the words matter as well. Don't you think that for MARKETING PURPOSES, it would help the manufacturers to call Edge-Lit LED lighting "Direct Backlight" if they used your shitty logic. "Well TECHNICALLY the Edge-Led sit a on a plane that's a couple of millimeters behind the LCD layer, therefore we should consider all of that to be one lighting source that exists DIRECTLY to the BACK of the LCD layer..............therefore we can call this "Direct Backlit LED" as well!!!" They're get sued within weeks of releasing those displays for using that term. 3 minutes ago, lynux3 said: Quote Cars classify engines by HORSEPOWER.................so cars are using HORSES, right? I mean if that what they put as the header of that column............then it must be true, right? That's last sentence is the chokehold in that gif. lnyxu won't be able to get out of it. Its easy to keep the chokehold in place. Edited July 5, 2020 by jehurey Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lynux3 2,052 Posted July 5, 2020 Share Posted July 5, 2020 Just now, jehurey said: No, it does matter. Not to mention the words matter as well. Don't you think that for MARKETING PURPOSES, it would help the manufacturers to call Edge-Lit LED lighting "Direct Backlight" if they used your shitty logic. Well TECHNICALLY the Edge-Led sit a on a plane that's a couple of millimeters behind the LCD layer, therefore we should consider all of that to be one lighting source that exists DIRECTLY to the BACK of the LCD layer..............therefore we can call this "Direct Backlit LED" as well!!! They're get sued within weeks of releasing those displays for using that term. Its easy to keep the chokehold in place. Sony Samsung LG Vizio You can't make this shit up. Jerry is that stupid. jerry Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,228 Posted July 5, 2020 Share Posted July 5, 2020 Just now, lynux3 said: Quote Cars classify engines by HORSEPOWER.................so cars are using HORSES, right? I mean if that what they put as the header of that column............then it must be true, right? That's last sentence is the chokehold in that gif. lnyxu won't be able to get out of it. This one is powered by a "Butthurt display" Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lynux3 2,052 Posted July 5, 2020 Share Posted July 5, 2020 In jerry land, where the retards roam, edge lit TVs don't emit any light on an LCD matrix because the light output isn't being directed and diffused towards the viewer. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DynamiteCop 2,085 Posted July 5, 2020 Share Posted July 5, 2020 1 minute ago, jehurey said: No, it does matter. Not to mention the words matter as well. Don't you think that for MARKETING PURPOSES, it would help the manufacturers to call Edge-Lit LED lighting "Direct Backlight" if they used your shitty logic. "Well TECHNICALLY the Edge-Led sit a on a plane that's a couple of millimeters behind the LCD layer, therefore we should consider all of that to be one lighting source that exists DIRECTLY to the BACK of the LCD layer..............therefore we can call this "Direct Backlit LED" as well!!!" They're get sued within weeks of releasing those displays for using that term. Its easy to keep the chokehold in place. Just like LED's are a different form of lighting source for an LCD as opposed to CCFL's, Edge-Lit is just a different form of back lighting as opposed to Full Array. This isn't complicated. This is rudimentary, your brain is a web of absolute inductions in logic and total bullshit. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,228 Posted July 5, 2020 Share Posted July 5, 2020 Just now, DynamitCop! ALM said: Just like LED's are a different form of lighting source for an LCD as opposed to CCFL's, Edge-Lit is just a different form of back lighting as opposed to Full Array. This isn't complicated. This is rudimentary, your brain is a web of absolute inductions in logic and total bullshit. No..................its not. ANd you just laid it out perfectly. CCFL's and LEDs are a DIFFERENT TYPE OF bulb. What we are talking about is the PLACEMENT of that bulb. CCFL's originally existed DIRECTLY BEHIND the LCD layer. But the TV were too thick and grew too hot. Then the CCFL's were placed on the edges. This helped on energy consumption (because there was literally less bulbs) but it affected the quality of lighting. The same thing is happening here. We are talking about PLACEMENT. If a MARKETING TEAM COULD GET AWAY with calling it "Direct Lighting"...................they would absolutely 100% call it that. But they can't, because it DOESN'T light the LCD directly. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DynamiteCop 2,085 Posted July 5, 2020 Share Posted July 5, 2020 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,228 Posted July 5, 2020 Share Posted July 5, 2020 4 minutes ago, lynux3 said: In jerry land, where the retards roam, edge lit TVs don't emit any light on an LCD matrix because the light output isn't being directed and diffused towards the viewer. The light output is clearly inferior in quality. That's why its a different type of lighting, and clearly does not qualify as an ACTUAL BACKLIGHT, because that would clearly imply DIRECT lighting. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,228 Posted July 5, 2020 Share Posted July 5, 2020 Just now, DynamitCop! ALM said: Ah..................so now he's "Edge-Lit" Butthurting. Instead of Direct-Butthurt. Gotta give him props for still helping me explain the difference, through other creative means. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kaz 2,439 Posted July 5, 2020 Share Posted July 5, 2020 jerry doesn't give a shit if he's right or wrong, he wants to argue for the sake of it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,228 Posted July 5, 2020 Share Posted July 5, 2020 2 minutes ago, kaz BLackMage said: jerry doesn't give a shit if he's right or wrong, he wants to argue for the sake of it. No, if I felt that I were wrong, or being misleading, I'd probably be a troll that doesn't last long. What happened here is that both me and Remij made Dynocrap feel embarass for his television coming off as inferior. And at the tail end of last night's argument...........he desperately tried to say that his tv handles lighting the same way modern tv do backlight, and that "its all backlighting" (meaning its all the same). If you're gonna bullshit that blatantly in front of me..........I'm going to make you regret it. And luynsx is here because he's been bitchslapped by me before and he thought he found a winning argument to celebrate. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChupacabraIII 134 Posted July 5, 2020 Share Posted July 5, 2020 @Alphonse @Twinblade yo, seriously. Give this stupid motherfucker jerry a break. Jesus christ the last 5 pages have literally been the same 3 or 4 statements from the same 3 people and, as usual, its fucking jerry instigating and injecting his retardation into a topic with anyone willing to be a retard with him. 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kaz 2,439 Posted July 5, 2020 Share Posted July 5, 2020 1 minute ago, jehurey said: No, if I felt that I were wrong, or being misleading, I'd probably be a troll that doesn't last long. What happened here is that both me and Remij made Dynocrap feel embarass for his television coming off as inferior. And at the tail end of last night's argument...........he desperately tried to say that his tv handles lighting the same way modern tv do backlight, and that "its all backlighting" (meaning its all the same). If you're gonna bullshit that blatantly in front of me..........I'm going to make you regret it. And luynsx is here because he's been bitchslapped by me before and he thought he found a winning argument to celebrate. lol i dont care, still love ya, jehuty. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lynux3 2,052 Posted July 5, 2020 Share Posted July 5, 2020 In jerry land, where the retards roam, edge lit TVs aren't considered a type of backlighting even though they're emitting light behind the panel... as if it were a backlight. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lynux3 2,052 Posted July 5, 2020 Share Posted July 5, 2020 8 minutes ago, jehurey said: The light output is clearly inferior in quality. That's why its a different type of lighting, and clearly does not qualify as an ACTUAL BACKLIGHT, because that would clearly imply DIRECT lighting. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,228 Posted July 5, 2020 Share Posted July 5, 2020 3 minutes ago, ChupacabraIII said: @Alphonse @Twinblade yo, seriously. Give this stupid motherfucker jerry a break. Jesus christ the last 5 pages have literally been the same 3 or 4 statements from the same 3 people and, as usual, its fucking jerry instigating and injecting his retardation into a topic with anyone willing to be a retard with him. except they're not actually making any meaningful argument, they're just re-posting their posts and pretending to laugh it off. They're the ones trolling. I'm the one actually trying to uphold an argument. I've pretty much explained LED lighting about 6 different times from 6 different sources...........that's not trolling, that's me actually trying to discuss something in a fair manner. Not to mention that I didn't even create this tangent, Dynocrap did. They're the ones who just make circular arguments. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DynamiteCop 2,085 Posted July 5, 2020 Share Posted July 5, 2020 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.