I'd love for someone to explain to me the reasoning for censoring all things Ivermectin

[Cooke 2,026]

Videos pulled from YouTube, demonization etc. A fucking Senate testimony of a doctor taking about this therapeutic was pulled from youtube.. wtf. 

 

It's a safe drug, it's been administered billions of times with no adverse effects, the creator won a Nobel peace prize in 2015. 

 

Because it hasn't been peer reviewed? That's hardly a reason to censor discussion of it and it's ongoing use in several countries. 

 

Disposable masks were never peer reviewed either yet their effectiveness is gospel now. 

 

[Ancalagon The Black 285]

You know the answer Cooke. Don't be coy.

There is no money to be made here.

As a matter of fact huge amounts of money would be lost, at least by the rich.

What's the stat? 3.9 trillion wealth transfer from the lower and middle class to the elites as a result of the Rona farce? Something like that anyway.

As you also know if Ivermectin is shown to be effective in 1st world countries then it's bye-bye shitty gene therapy and all the windfall pharma makes down the road pretending to deal with the avalanche of problems the vaxes are causing and will continue to create as time goes on.

On top of that if Ivermectin is shown to work here then that paper shield pharma holds up to say "we can't be held liable, blah blah blah" won't mean shit  if it is found they are suppressing an actual treatment that works.

Ivermectin is like the truth in this case.

 

Once you live the lie long enough the truth becomes anathema.

 

Plus who likes admitting they were wrong?

 

[Twinblade★ 3,892]

So is there any more concrete data behind this drug? I keep on seeing news articles about people dying from COVID despite taking it. I don't think its the miracle treatment we were hoping for.