Are there no free pc bench marks now?

[jehurey 3,230]

Just now, Remij said:

I spent $1200 on the best card of the time.. for 2 whole years uncontested.

 

 

 

 

Yeah...........you didn't even have ray-traced games to contest your video card

 

You're definitely right about that phrasing...............uncontested..............hell, UNTESTED

[Remij 4,672]

1 minute ago, jehurey said:

Yeah...........you didn't even have ray-traced games to contest your video card

 

You're definitely right about that phrasing...............uncontested..............hell, UNTESTED

 

 

[jehurey 3,230]

2 minutes ago, Remij said:

 

 

Notice how he can't name those games during 2019 and early 2020.

 

He runs away, every time.

 

And will continue running away, every time.

 

I think he's starting to realize that whenever he types a list, the entire forum laughs at him.

[DynamiteCop 2,085]

51 minutes ago, jehurey said:

Actually I ended up paying about $400 because my two RTX 3080 had lovely profit margins to pay off my RTX 3090.

 

You simply paid $1200 for an obselete video card two years ago for ray-tracing that you never got.

 

I'd rather play Cyberpunk than Metro Exodus patches multiple times over LOL.

 

Look at this continued butthurt

 

LOL no, you can't. I'm sure you'd like to since you got shit out of it.

 

Its hilarious how you guys are so desperate, since there was no economic stimulus payment in the Fall of 2020, when I bought three video cards back to back to back.

 

Even hilarious how I'm speaking to people who ended up buying CHEAPER VIDEO CARDS.........or straight up COULDN'T AFFORD TO PAY FOR A NEW ONE.

 

LOL AMD video cards = second-class citizens

My "second class citizen" $1,000 AMD GPU beats your $1,500 Nvidia GPU in the most commonly used display resolutions, so lol at you is all I can say. 

 

Get the fuck out of here you smelly fuck 

[jehurey 3,230]

Just now, DynamiteCop said:

My "second class citizen" $1,000 AMD GPU beats your $1,500 Nvidia GPU in the most commonly used display resolutions, so lol at you is all I can say. 

 

Get the fuck out of here you smelly fuck 

LOL.................so sub 4K resolutions.

 

Thanks for confirming that you're a second-class citizen

 

Like did you honestly think you were going to be able to slip that one by me?

[JonDnD 2,618]

I got 16486 in firestrike and 7093 in timespy. I assumed cookes CPU would be much better than mine.

[Remij 4,672]

1 minute ago, DynamiteCop said:

My "second class citizen" $1,000 AMD GPU beats your $1,500 Nvidia GPU in the most commonly used display resolutions, so lol at you is all I can say. 

 

Get the fuck out of here you smelly fuck 

He's mad because my 2080ti went an entire GPU generation without any response from AMD..... and then he buys a 3090... and AMD releases a card that beats it in raster 3 months later  

 

The funniest thing of all though is that he doesn't even game.

 

 

I mean.. if he IS gaming... it's fucking.... BLACK FLAG on his PC... which stutters bad for him  

[DynamiteCop 2,085]

Just now, jehurey said:

LOL.................so sub 4K resolutions.

 

Thanks for confirming that you're a second-class citizen

 

Like did you honestly think you were going to be able to slip that one by me?

Who the fuck targets 4K on a PC right now? That's retarded as all hell. That's like targeting 1440p in 2013, it's a dumb unperformative resolution that won't be viable for desktops for another 4-5 years. 

 

The smartest course of action for PC displays right now is 1440p ultrawide, the end. 

[jehurey 3,230]

Just now, DynamiteCop said:

Who the fuck targets 4K on a PC right now?

I'm absolutely screenshotting this.

 

This is an instant classic.

[DynamiteCop 2,085]

Just now, jehurey said:

I'm absolutely screenshotting this.

 

This is an instant classic.

Go ahead, it's a based post and a fact of reality. You can enjoy 70 FPS at 4K while I'm hitting over 130 on an ultrawide monitor which looks virtually identical on displays this small. 

 

You're completely retarded, resolutions are already high relative to the displays. Chasing absurd resolution which hampers performance instead of garnering performance when these displays are offered is something an idiot would do.

 

And you're an idiot so no surprise there. 

[jehurey 3,230]

21 minutes ago, DynamiteCop said:

Go ahead, it's a based post and a fact of reality

..........of second-class citizens.

 

You bought a card to make your framerates look good at 1080p resolutions................good for you, sweetheart.

 

Some of us here know what a PC is really meant for.

[DynamiteCop 2,085]

28 minutes ago, jehurey said:

..........of second-class citizens.

 

You bought a card to make your framerates look good at 1080p resolutions................good for you, sweetheart.

 

Some of us here know what a PC is really meant for.

Are you retarded? The answer is yes btw.

 

Edited August 6, 2021 by DynamiteCop

[jehurey 3,230]

36 minutes ago, DynamiteCop said:

Are you retarded? The answer is yes btw.

 

Playing sub 4K UHD because your video card can't handle it.

 

While you do stupid shit like mounting your video card vertically.

 

It'd be even more hilarious if you were to realize that you probably ended up using riser cables for that mounting that limit you to PCIe 3.0 for your video card, and you don't even realize it.

[DynamiteCop 2,085]

5 minutes ago, jehurey said:

Playing sub 4K UHD because your video card can't handle it.

 

While you do stupid shit like mounting your video card vertically.

 

It'd be even more hilarious if you were to realize that you probably ended up using riser cables for that mounting that limit you to PCIe 3.0 for your video card, and you don't even realize it.

My 6900XT can't handle 4K? What in the fuck is wrong with your brain... I play sub 4K because 4K is retarded for these display sizes and the performance hit is unacceptable. It's not a viable display method yet unless you're targeting 60 FPS, and in that event why in the fuck would you want to?

 

Also, since you're always so wrong and dumb...

 

 

"Bu...bu...but you're limited to PCI-E 3.0 because you're using a riser kit.... Hurrr durrrr"

 

God you're a moron 

 

[jehurey 3,230]

26 minutes ago, DynamiteCop said:

It's not a viable display method yet unless you're targeting 60 FPS

in other words.................actual PC gaming.

 

Keep on playing on your 1440p trash, nobody cares if its ultrawide.

 

Second-class citizen.

 

And the good thing about having PCIe 3.0e riser cables is................you're never going to be rendering a high-enough resolution with your 1440p monitor to actually find out that there's a bandwidth limit.

so at least you got that going for you.

[Remij 4,672]

Holy shit... dipshithurey has lost his fucking mind  

 

You can tell he's TRULY buttfucked atm 😂🤣

[Remij 4,672]

4 hours ago, DynamiteCop said:

Are you retarded? The answer is yes btw.

 

 

And this is his setup 

 

 

"Second class citizen" he tells others

"Actual PC gaming" he says

 

The dust and those massive scratches on his completely shit tier monitor... that 90's era desk with a dust cleaner jar sitting right there 

[Sergio Perez SP11 173]

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/19312797

[jehurey 3,230]

Oh man, I left these two second-class PC citizens absolutely livid

 

1 hour ago, Remij said:

Holy shit... dipshithurey has lost his fucking mind  

 

You can tell he's TRULY buttfucked atm 😂🤣

I can tell that Dynocrap shut his mouth the moment Beggij showed him the photo of my RTX 3090

1 hour ago, Remij said:

 

And this is his setup 

 

 

"Second class citizen" he tells others

"Actual PC gaming" he says

 

The dust and those massive scratches on his completely shit tier monitor... that 90's era desk with a dust cleaner jar sitting right there 

His weaker PC and lower resolution monitor...................................has less dust.

 

That's the best thing he could say about his "setup"

 

[DynamiteCop 2,085]

5 hours ago, jehurey said:

in other words.................actual PC gaming.

 

Keep on playing on your 1440p trash, nobody cares if its ultrawide.

 

Second-class citizen.

 

And the good thing about having PCIe 3.0e riser cables is................you're never going to be rendering a high-enough resolution with your 1440p monitor to actually find out that there's a bandwidth limit.

so at least you got that going for you.

It's a 4.0 riser dumbass, did you not get that from the picture....