Quad Damage 1,717 Posted November 24, 2021 Share Posted November 24, 2021 https://www.gamespot.com/reviews/battlefield-2042-review-character-development/1900-6417785/ same score as cod at gs and lower than cod at mc 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Twinblade★ 3,892 Posted November 24, 2021 Share Posted November 24, 2021 So the guy played the game for 14 hours at a review event, before the public got their hands on it and decided it was worthy of a 8 Then the game comes out, everyone is outraged, and he decides to lower the score to a 7 after playing for just a few more hours, citing bugs as the main reason So why weren't the bugs an issue originally? Why did they become such a focus once other people started bitching about them? The guy basically lowered the score because of other peoples' backlash instead of going off of his own experience GS blows. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
-GD-X★ 7,729 Posted November 24, 2021 Share Posted November 24, 2021 lmfao!!!!! i think this is a first at GS usually, the score goes up! 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Quad Damage 1,717 Posted November 24, 2021 Author Share Posted November 24, 2021 9 minutes ago, Twinblade said: So the guy played the game for 14 hours at a review event, before the public got their hands on it and decided it was worthy of a 8 Then the game comes out, everyone is outraged, and he decides to lower the score to a 7 after playing for just a few more hours, citing bugs as the main reason So why weren't the bugs an issue originally? Why did they become such a focus once other people started bitching about them? The guy basically lowered the score because of other peoples' backlash instead of going off of his own experience GS blows. GS blows because they waited to publish a final score until they tested it in the real world, and not right after after a highly controlled review event? lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Twinblade★ 3,892 Posted November 24, 2021 Share Posted November 24, 2021 Just now, Quad Damage said: GS blows because they waited to publish a final score until they tested it in the real world, and not right after after a highly controlled review event? lol There were connection/server issues at the review event, that extended through the early access period. In fact the game at release is actually more stable than it was during the review period, so it makes no sense for the score to go down. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Twinblade★ 3,892 Posted November 24, 2021 Share Posted November 24, 2021 Just had a match where I was dogfighting this chopper and we were weaving in and around the skyscrapers on the urban map. As I chased him around the glass on the skyscrapers was being shattered by our weapons until I finally managed to blow him up before he was able to round the corner again. The whole experience was epic and like something out of an action movie this game owns every other MP shooter even if it feels like it was programmed in a Chinese sweatshop at times 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,227 Posted November 24, 2021 Share Posted November 24, 2021 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,249 Posted November 24, 2021 Share Posted November 24, 2021 1 hour ago, Twinblade said: So the guy played the game for 14 hours at a review event, before the public got their hands on it and decided it was worthy of a 8 Then the game comes out, everyone is outraged, and he decides to lower the score to a 7 after playing for just a few more hours, citing bugs as the main reason So why weren't the bugs an issue originally? Why did they become such a focus once other people started bitching about them? The guy basically lowered the score because of other peoples' backlash instead of going off of his own experience GS blows. Cry me a river Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kaz 2,439 Posted November 25, 2021 Share Posted November 25, 2021 its just battlefield.... again who cares about vidja scores, twinb, just enjoy it 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,249 Posted November 25, 2021 Share Posted November 25, 2021 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lynux3 2,049 Posted November 25, 2021 Share Posted November 25, 2021 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Twinblade★ 3,892 Posted November 25, 2021 Share Posted November 25, 2021 52 minutes ago, lynux3 said: BFV still looks great, but most of this video is comparing it with the remade 1942 assets, which aren't exactly pushing any boundaries. When it comes to the base game the 128 players, significantly larger maps, and weather events like the tornado make it far more impressive. The one downside is that the maps are definitely a bit sparse, and not as detailed as they could have been. That was a necessary sacrifice for the increased scale im guessing. Once they finally drop last gen consoles and go 100% in on current gen, I think we'll see some more impressive stuff though. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TLHBO 2,158 Posted November 25, 2021 Share Posted November 25, 2021 (edited) Reviews in progress ”We don’t want to piss off publishers so here’s an 8 during the initial launch and we will flop it at a safer time” Edited November 25, 2021 by TLHBO Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Vini 430 Posted November 25, 2021 Share Posted November 25, 2021 This game was released unfinished, so it deserves to be panned. 6 months from now it'll be a great game. Portal has unlimited potential. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. House 3,371 Posted November 29, 2021 Share Posted November 29, 2021 This is why I always avoid these type of multiplayer FPS games at launch. You wait like a year and it becomes a bargain bin $20 purchase with additional content, no bugs and fully working online functionalities. Also, a better community that knows the game. I played BF1 for the first time this year and it was still pretty awesome. I could go back to playing it right now and it cost me like 6 dollars. Lots of hacker though. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Twinblade★ 3,892 Posted November 29, 2021 Share Posted November 29, 2021 55 minutes ago, Ramza said: This is why I always avoid these type of multiplayer FPS games at launch. You wait like a year and it becomes a bargain bin $20 purchase with additional content, no bugs and fully working online functionalities. Also, a better community that knows the game. I played BF1 for the first time this year and it was still pretty awesome. I could go back to playing it right now and it cost me like 6 dollars. Lots of hacker though. Game will be fine by January/February. They've already fixed a bunch of stuff in the first 2-3 weeks since early access. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Quad Damage 1,717 Posted December 2, 2021 Author Share Posted December 2, 2021 dropped into the 60's https://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/battlefield-2042 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Impossible 407 Posted December 2, 2021 Share Posted December 2, 2021 1 hour ago, Quad Damage said: dropped into the 60's https://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/battlefield-2042 Game will be fine by January or February. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Twinblade★ 3,892 Posted December 2, 2021 Share Posted December 2, 2021 25 minutes ago, Mr. Impossible said: Game will be fine by January or February. March at most. but the game is already in a good state if you can deal with the bugs and endure some of the bizarre design decisions. I've already put more time into it than BFV and its only been 3 weeks Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,227 Posted December 2, 2021 Share Posted December 2, 2021 This is Dynocrap-levels of pathetic Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.