Jump to content

Why is Twitter trying so hard to prevent Elon Musk from taking it over?


Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Cooke said:

Lmao vaccine definition was changed in 2021

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/coronavirus/article254111268.html

 

You're so uninformed

 

 

No, they didn't change anything.

 

The CDC is not the dictionary.

 

And the dictionary isn't some legal definition.

 

And a vaccine was never meant as something absolute.

 

There is nothing that word change that changes how people understand the way vaccines are meant to work.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 858
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Ooh it's coming.. But fair enough. 

The DNC and its propaganda press have you so programmed that you're sending angry tweets to Elon?   If the lefty press hadn't been throwing a temper tantrum over losing control of Twitter,

Don't like it? Make your own Twitter (wait there's more)  

Posted Images

5 minutes ago, jehurey said:

So go ahead and type what is the claim here

 

Type it out.......or else, you are pretty saying that you have nothing.

its already typed out Jehurey. Are you unable to do anything for yourself? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Cooke said:

its already typed out Jehurey. Are you unable to do anything for yourself? 

No its not.

 

Stop wasting time with your stalling.

 

YOU TYPE what the claim is.

 

The more you post while NOT TYPING THE CLAIM.............the more we know that you have nothing.

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, jehurey said:

No, they didn't change anything.

 

The CDC is not the dictionary.

 

And the dictionary isn't some legal definition.

 

And a vaccine was never meant as something absolute.

 

There is nothing that word change that changes how people understand the way vaccines are meant to work.

Up until 2021 everyone thought a vaccine created immunity. That was the standard definition since the beginning of vaccines.  Once it was realized these covid shots did not provide immunity as they were claimed to in the beginning the definition just magically changed for no reason right? Why the fuck would they change it? Answer that bitch. Why? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jehurey said:

No its not.

 

Stop wasting time with your stalling.

 

YOU TYPE what the claim is.

 

The more you post while NOT TYPING THE CLAIM.............the more we know that you have nothing.

I DIDNT FUCKING MAKE A CLAIM YOU TARD. Im posting more of the twitter files. Read it if you want. If not, then fuck off. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Cooke said:

I DIDNT FUCKING MAKE A CLAIM YOU TARD. Im posting more of the twitter files. Read it if you want. If not, then fuck off. 

You do know when we post things..................we didn't type the articles as well?

 

RIght?

 

Like.............you know that right?

 

And you know that doesn't stop us from listing out the DAMNING claim against Trump, or other GOP people, in detail.

 

So................go ahead................and type..............the................claim.

 

What is it?

 

let's hear it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jehurey said:

You do know when we post things..................we didn't type the articles as well?

 

RIght?

 

Like.............you know that right?

 

And you know that doesn't stop us from listing out the DAMNING claim against Trump, or other GOP people, in detail.

 

So................go ahead................and type..............the................claim.

 

What is it?

 

let's hear it.

I sincerely hope you were beaten as a child and this explains your behavior. I can't even read that, its so repulsive to the eyes. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Cooke said:

I sincerely hope

sorry that's not gonna work, either.

 

so................uh..............you basically have nothing?

 

Is that what I'm seeing?  You have nothing?

 

No scandal? no claim? No nothing?

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, jehurey said:

sorry that's not gonna work, either.

 

so................uh..............you basically have nothing?

 

Is that what I'm seeing?  You have nothing?

 

No scandal? no claim? No nothing?

listen kid. These twitter files are showing the inside workings of how twitter lied, gaslit, and deceived everyone as to how they operated and how they were politically motivated.  Google. Facebook. etc are probably even worse. The far left echo chamber of silicon valley with ZERO diversity of thought.  They operate as an extension of the DNC and the FBI. Regular weekly meetings with the FBI and DHS? lol what?  

 

 

 

 

FjklfWZWYAEozgn.jpg

Edited by Cooke
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Cooke said:

listen kid. These twitter files are showing the inside workings of how twitter lied

 

 

 

No, you don't appear to have any evidence of that.

 

Somebody made a claim that was immediately debunked by listing Twitter's own ToS, which completely contradicts the claim that they did things "in secret".

 

So...............you have nothing?

 

No real evidence?

 

Correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, jehurey said:

No, you don't appear to have any evidence of that.

 

Somebody made a claim that was immediately debunked by listing Twitter's own ToS, which completely contradicts the claim that they did things "in secret".

 

So...............you have nothing?

 

No real evidence?

 

Correct?

The evidence is in the slack and email exchanges between management :|

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Cooke said:

Up until 2021 everyone thought a vaccine created immunity. That was the standard definition since the beginning of vaccines.  Once it was realized these covid shots did not provide immunity as they were claimed to in the beginning the definition just magically changed for no reason right? Why the fuck would they change it? Answer that bitch. Why? 

 

Why are you so uninformed?  Vaccine immunity doesn't meant 100% you dumb cunt. No vaccine under the sun is 100% never was and never will be.  

 

The CDC changed the wording back to what it originally was because dumb fucks like yourself somehow took vaccine immunity to mean 100%.

 

“While there have been slight changes in wording over time to the definition of ‘vaccine’ on CDC’s website, those haven’t impacted the overall definition,” the statement read. "The previous definition could be interpreted to mean that vaccines were 100% effective, which has never been the case for any vaccine."

 

This is the change your dumbass think changes the definition. 

 

The CDC previously defined vaccination as: “The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.” Now, as per the update in September 2021, it defines it as: “The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection to a specific disease"

 

 

If you look on the CDC website using a web archive like you can also find this vaccination page from 2015 you will see the similar wording as the 2021 definition. 

 

https://web.archive.org/web/20150902133540/https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/ensuringsafety/history/index.html

 

"Vaccines are the best defense we have against infectious diseases; however, no vaccine is actually 100% safe or effective" 

 

 

 

You can't help but be stupid and uniformed ... Jeezus. 

 

Edited by Goukosan
Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Cooke said:

The evidence is in the slack and email exchanges between management :|

So post that evidence.

 

let's see it.

 

Once again................its already debunk because clearly posted the ToS that already describes that.

 

So the claim that things are done "in secret"....................where's your evidence?

 

If the slack and email exchanges are saying things that are ALREADY IN THE TERMS OF SERVICE............then, its not a "secret" now is it???????????????

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Cooke said:

The evidence is in the slack and email exchanges between management :|

 

No that shows them discussing and making decisions about modding.... You know like the mod board right here on SW. 

 

You noticed after Twitter files 1...for some odd reason Musk and crew stopped showing you the tweets/tweet reference code that lead those accounts to be banned? 

 

Because people we're able to use web archive and find the hunter Biden related tweets and it turned out to be nudes.   Which killed the entire Twitter files part 1 narrative that Twitter and the Biden Administration was collude to silence thw story because 1) It was nudes of a private citizen that was taken down 2) Biden wasn't president. 

 

Musk then had to go delete all his tweets claiming freedom of speech was infringed... Lmfao

 

 

Then for Twitter files 2...turns out it in the TOS that your reach will be reduced if you abuse Twitter, post hate speech etc.  So even though Musk and crew stopped providing the reference tweet code for Twitter files 2 like that did for part 1...

 

Twitter files 2 still bombed as people found Musk's tweet saying "freedom of speech isn't freedom of reach" and that he will implement "new' rules to reduce reach of people who abuse Twitter and post hate speech etc.... Lmfao. 

 

 

 

And for Twitter files part 3...once again.. Musk and crew didn't post the tweet reference codes.... Notice a pattern? Lmfao they don't want people looking up the reasons why those accounts were banned. 

 

Anyway.. Since Twitter files 3 focused on Trump getting banned.  The claims that it was election tampering is laughable as Trump was banned on Jan 6th.... Two month after he lost the election and only AFTER HE INCITED the violent attack on the capitol.  

 

The slack and email exchanges for Twitter files 3 show that Twitter mod board saying that if Joe Biden did something similar they would ban him too. 

 

 

Oh yeah... Forgot to mention when they were meeting with DHS and FBI regularly.. Trump was president and HIS PEOPLE were in those meetings. 

 

Another nothing burger.

 

:drake:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2022-12-09 at 1:21 PM, Cooke said:

By banning. You don't need to shadow ban if what they did was actually against the rules. It's when someone says something you don't like but is not breaking the rules that shadow bans are used. 

 

Shadow bans are far more effective at curbing spam than outright banning. There's a reason basically every major website with open signups implements shadowbans.

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Cooke said:

listen kid. These twitter files are showing the inside workings of how twitter lied, gaslit, and deceived everyone as to how they operated and how they were politically motivated.  Google. Facebook. etc are probably even worse. The far left echo chamber of silicon valley with ZERO diversity of thought.  They operate as an extension of the DNC and the FBI. Regular weekly meetings with the FBI and DHS? lol what?  

 

 

 

 

FjklfWZWYAEozgn.jpg

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Hot Sauce changed the title to Why is Twitter trying so hard to prevent Elon Musk from taking it over?
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...