Literal Nazi Rudolf Hess 278 Posted January 6, 2023 Share Posted January 6, 2023 https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)02187-0/fulltext It's supposed to be a study on monkey pox effects on women. But nearly half the participants are trans women sex workers with HIV. Are we supposed to now ignore ANY biological differences between men and women? This disease mostly affects gay MEN. You know, those dudes with penises and balls? Wtf is going on? Follow the science lol Link to post Share on other sites
bhytre 2,753 Posted January 6, 2023 Share Posted January 6, 2023 Biden voters are generally pretty gross people Link to post Share on other sites
Cooke 2,026 Posted January 6, 2023 Share Posted January 6, 2023 The SJW hula hoops they jump through to satisfy the woke mob is hilarious. Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Impossible 407 Posted January 6, 2023 Share Posted January 6, 2023 3 hours ago, Literal Nazi Rudolf Hess said: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)02187-0/fulltext It's supposed to be a study on monkey pox effects on women. But nearly half the participants are trans women sex workers with HIV. The title of the article is: Human monkeypox virus infection in women and non-binary individuals during the 2022 outbreaks: a global case series How exactly was this confusing for you when it's literally in the fucking title. 3 hours ago, Literal Nazi Rudolf Hess said: Are we supposed to now ignore ANY biological differences between men and women? This disease mostly affects gay MEN. You know, those dudes with penises and balls? Wtf is going on? Follow the science lol Quote Interpretation The clinical features of monkeypox in women and non-binary individuals were similar to those described in men, including the presence of anal and genital lesions with prominent mucosal involvement. Anatomically, anogenital lesions were reflective of sexual practices: vulvovaginal lesions predominated in cis women and non-binary individuals and anorectal features predominated in trans women. The prevalence of HIV co-infection in the cohort was high. No shit genius, that is exactly what the point was. To see the differences across the gender spectrum. This kind of retarded bullshit is why I sometimes think you're just Cooke's burner account. 3 hours ago, bhytre said: Biden voters are generally pretty gross people 2 hours ago, Cooke said: The SJW hula hoops they jump through to satisfy the woke mob is hilarious. So one idiot misreads an article, post it, and more idiots pile in also not reading the same article. @Ramza This is why the right wingers are a joke on this forum. Link to post Share on other sites
Cooke 2,026 Posted January 6, 2023 Share Posted January 6, 2023 45 minutes ago, Mr. Impossible said: The title of the article is: Human monkeypox virus infection in women and non-binary individuals during the 2022 outbreaks: a global case series How exactly was this confusing for you when it's literally in the fucking title. No shit genius, that is exactly what the point was. To see the differences across the gender spectrum. This kind of retarded bullshit is why I sometimes think you're just Cooke's burner account. So one idiot misreads an article, post it, and more idiots pile in also not reading the same article. @Ramza This is why the right wingers are a joke on this forum. Did you fucking read it dummy? Link to post Share on other sites
Substatic 420 Posted January 6, 2023 Share Posted January 6, 2023 (edited) 53 minutes ago, Cooke said: Did you fucking read it dummy? What am I looking for? I see this line, Ours is the first case series to focus on and describe the risk factors and clinical presentations of monkeypox virus infection in cis and trans women and non-binary individuals assigned female at birth during the 2022 global outbreak. They are specifically looking at multiple groups in the study. They do not once say those groups are the same biologically. The clinical trial characteristics chart is separates the two, which is further proof of this. Which helps confirms the false outrage due to misreading by the OP. As stated, the conservatives in this board are fucking stupid as dog shit. As if the threads on covid, abortion, recession, and climate change didn't already confirm this. It's best you guys strictly discuss your opinions and never mention anything science related because it ALWAYS backfires. Although it's funny seeing you guys obsess over trans bullshit, so much so that you can't even understand a simple study. It's all the fake culture wars far right loons think about, trans bussy. Edited January 7, 2023 by Substatic Link to post Share on other sites
Cooke 2,026 Posted January 7, 2023 Share Posted January 7, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, Substatic said: What am I looking for? I see this line, Ours is the first case series to focus on and describe the risk factors and clinical presentations of monkeypox virus infection in cis and trans women and non-binary individuals assigned female at birth during the 2022 global outbreak. They are specifically looking at multiple groups in the study. They do not once say those groups are the same biologically. The clinical trial characteristics chart is separates the two, which is further proof of this. Which helps confirms the false outrage due to misreading by the OP. As stated, the conservatives in this board are fucking stupid as dog shit. As if the threads on covid, abortion, recession, and climate change didn't already confirm this. It's best you guys strictly discuss your opinions and never mention anything science related because it ALWAYS backfires. Although it's funny seeing you guys obsess over trans bullshit, so much so that you can't even understand a simple study. It's all the fake culture wars far right loons think about, trans bussy. So why not include men? Since trans women have male anotomy and are engaging in gay sex since they do not have vaginas? The whole premise is just woke bullshit. The title says it's women and non binary... Ok fine. All the non binary in the study have female anatomy, so they are women. The other half are men pretending to be women. Why exclude normal men? Mpox (as it's now known, so we don't insult monkeys) affects men 90%+ of the time. Sure go ahead and study the affects on women.. But why does it include trans women? That doesn't make biological sense. Edited January 7, 2023 by Cooke Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Impossible 407 Posted January 7, 2023 Share Posted January 7, 2023 1 hour ago, Cooke said: Did you fucking read it dummy? Yes, retard. Did any of you? I posted the fucking headline of the article as well as their stated purpose. HOW ARE YOU THIS FUCKING STUPID? Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. House 3,371 Posted January 7, 2023 Share Posted January 7, 2023 Link to post Share on other sites
Substatic 420 Posted January 7, 2023 Share Posted January 7, 2023 51 minutes ago, Cooke said: So why not include men? Since trans women have male anymore and are engaging in gay sex since they do not have vaginas? Because they are specifically looking at women and trans-women. Are you suggesting ANY study that looks at trans-women in their own category is woke? That's some of the most bat shit things I've heard here. It's not wokeness, it's just you 4 having a low IQ. Quote Sure go ahead and study the affects on women.. But why does it include trans women? That doesn't make biological sense. It's looking at two categories. Women and transwomen charts are separated. Not combined. You guys are so infatuated with trans cocks, it's worse than Aza really. Link to post Share on other sites
Cooke 2,026 Posted January 7, 2023 Share Posted January 7, 2023 30 minutes ago, Substatic said: Because they are specifically looking at women and trans-women. Are you suggesting ANY study that looks at trans-women in their own category is woke? That's some of the most bat shit things I've heard here. It's not wokeness, it's just you 4 having a low IQ. It's looking at two categories. Women and transwomen charts are separated. Not combined. You guys are so infatuated with trans cocks, it's worse than Aza really. Why? Why women and trans women together? What purpose would this serve other than to appease some stupid woke agenda that says trans women are women? Which science says they aren't. Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Impossible 407 Posted January 7, 2023 Share Posted January 7, 2023 3 hours ago, Substatic said: Although it's funny seeing you guys obsess over trans bullshit, so much so that you can't even understand a simple study. It's all the fake culture wars far right loons think about, trans bussy. Lol proclaims to be gay but gets upset anytime queer people are appreciated, visible, or humored. His right wing self hatred programming is strong. Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Impossible 407 Posted January 7, 2023 Share Posted January 7, 2023 1 hour ago, Cooke said: Why? Why women and trans women together? What purpose would this serve other than to appease some stupid woke agenda that says trans women are women? Which science says they aren't. Yes, these scientists created this study to appease the "woke mob". I'm sure BLM and ANTIFA were getting ready to burn down some cities if these scientists didn't study monkeypox in trans' bussies. You some how manage to keep making yourself look dumber and dumber. Link to post Share on other sites
Cooke 2,026 Posted January 7, 2023 Share Posted January 7, 2023 1 minute ago, Mr. Impossible said: Yes, these scientists created this study to appease the "woke mob". I'm sure BLM and ANTIFA were getting ready to burn down some cities if these scientists didn't study monkeypox in trans' bussies. You some how manage to keep making yourself look dumber and dumber. Universities have been captured by your society destroying ideology.. So I'm not surprised. Link to post Share on other sites
Substatic 420 Posted January 7, 2023 Share Posted January 7, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, Cooke said: Which science says they aren't. This study never claimed otherwise. You're obsession over trans cock has got your brain all twisted up. Latching on to this woke bullshit, when it's not even really there, is one of the reasons the US Right got smashed a few months ago. Regular Americans did not give a fuck about your obessions. Edited January 7, 2023 by Substatic Link to post Share on other sites
Substatic 420 Posted January 7, 2023 Share Posted January 7, 2023 (edited) 21 minutes ago, Cooke said: society destroying ideology. The more left leaning a State or county, the higher HDI and QOL it has. Same goes for countries. Furthermore, nearly all domestic terror is from the right. Pretty sure backwards HDI, QOL, and Domestic Terror are superior indicators of "society destroying" than.......studies on trannies...... Man you far right people really have to get out more. Edited January 7, 2023 by Substatic Link to post Share on other sites
Cooke 2,026 Posted January 7, 2023 Share Posted January 7, 2023 34 minutes ago, Substatic said: This study never claimed otherwise. You're obsession over trans cock has got your brain all twisted up. Latching on to this woke bullshit, when it's not even really there, is one of the reasons the US Right got smashed a few months ago. Regular Americans did not give a fuck about your obessions. You're deflecting. Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,249 Posted January 7, 2023 Share Posted January 7, 2023 16 minutes ago, Cooke said: You're deflecting. You're retarded as usual you don't read shit you're posting about. Link to post Share on other sites
Cooke 2,026 Posted January 7, 2023 Share Posted January 7, 2023 1 hour ago, Goukosan said: You're retarded as usual you don't read shit you're posting about. Yeah I did read it. Did you? It's fucking ridiculous. Link to post Share on other sites
Goukosan 2,249 Posted January 7, 2023 Share Posted January 7, 2023 4 minutes ago, Cooke said: Yeah I did read it. Did you? It's fucking ridiculous. Nah you're just retarded by responding to claims the study never made. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts