Substatic 421 Posted January 19, 2023 Share Posted January 19, 2023 (edited) Is there a link to the journal this was published in? Edited January 19, 2023 by Substatic Link to post Share on other sites
Cooke 2,026 Posted January 19, 2023 Author Share Posted January 19, 2023 21 minutes ago, Substatic said: Is there a link to the journal this was published in? You're reading it first on twitter. Whether he publishes in a journal is up to him. All the sources are provided in the timeline. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Cooke 2,026 Posted January 21, 2023 Author Share Posted January 21, 2023 Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,230 Posted January 21, 2023 Share Posted January 21, 2023 On 2023-01-19 at 2:12 PM, Cooke said: You're reading it first on twitter. Whether he publishes in a journal is up to him oh, so he has no actual credibility and he clearly doesn't want his work to be peer reviewed by experts. thanks for letting us know. another nothingburger. Link to post Share on other sites
Cooke 2,026 Posted January 21, 2023 Author Share Posted January 21, 2023 (edited) 22 minutes ago, jehurey said: oh, so he has no actual credibility and he clearly doesn't want his work to be peer reviewed by experts. thanks for letting us know. another nothingburger. Why would this even be in a journal anyway? It's a timeline of factual events. It's not a study on the efficacy of vaccines.. By the way you do realize peer reviewed studies are incredibly flawed right? The group submitting the study only submits the data they want to be reviewed. They can omit as much negative data as they wish. The reviewers do not get access to all the information. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1420798/ You guys treat it like it's the bible or something. When Pfizer sends it's data in for review they do not send the entire picture. They send the data most likely to pass the review process. Edited January 21, 2023 by Cooke Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. House 3,371 Posted January 21, 2023 Share Posted January 21, 2023 The place where Covid started just happened to have a research center that worked on Covid like viruses. It's all purely coincidental. Let's trust the CCP and US Government on this. Nothing to see here, move along folks. Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,230 Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 On 2023-01-20 at 11:08 PM, Cooke said: Why would this even be in a journal anyway? It's a timeline of factual events. So you're saying its completely worthless information that you posted? Thanks for clarifying. Link to post Share on other sites
Cooke 2,026 Posted January 23, 2023 Author Share Posted January 23, 2023 (edited) 7 hours ago, jehurey said: So you're saying its completely worthless information that you posted? Thanks for clarifying. Only if you're an idiot that has no capability of understanding a timeline of events and needs to be spoon fed information like a toddler.. Edited January 23, 2023 by Cooke Link to post Share on other sites
jehurey 3,230 Posted January 23, 2023 Share Posted January 23, 2023 4 hours ago, Cooke said: Only if you're an idiot that has no capability of understanding a timeline of events and needs to be spoon fed information like a toddler.. Except we all know the timeline of events, because we were posting them while they were happening. The only person who would look like an idiot, would be the one coming in almost 3 years later and pretending that their teaching us something. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts