-
Content Count
7,721 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
37
Content Type
Calendar
Profiles
Forums
Posts posted by Voidler
-
-
Damn that was a shit conference. I expected them to blow us away but MS is just so low quality across the board. Redfall and Starfield looked like hot shit. So many games missing and in dev hell. Expansions for Minecraft, Sea of Thieves, and Grounded as your major new announcements
- 1
-
They are releasing a trailer at the end of June, I know somebody in PS marketing team. I expect that trailer will have the release date
-
Best on PS5
-
5 minutes ago, JonbX said:
They will also be on PSPC+Pass
Sony should make that to be fair
-
2 hours ago, Remij said:
Uncharted 4
Uncharted: Lost Legacy
Spider-Man Remastered
Spider-Man Miles Morales
God of War
Ratchet and Clank: Rift Apart
Ratchet and Clank 2016
Horizon: Zero Dawn
Horizon: Forbidden West
Days Gone
Returnal
Sackboy
Death Stranding
Ghost of Tsushima
GT7
Demon's Souls
Bloodborne
TLOU: Factions
TLOU: Remastered
TLOU2
We know for a fact every single one of those games either has come, or is coming...
Jesus fucking christ... everything cows hold dear.... raped and pillaged
Just buy a PS5 if you love them so much. Most of those are already free with PS Plus
- 1
-
15 minutes ago, Goukosan said:
TLOU and Portal were new IPs when they launched. That's not even comparable to a Souls game called Bloodborne.
Doesn't share any branding, world, or even the same gameplay loop as Dark or Demons Souls. Don't mistake the director having signature elements to his games making them a single IP
And from a purely business perspective, new trademarks and copyrights were created for Bloodborne which are owned by Sony - unlike Dark Souls owned by Bandai Namco. It is 100% a new IP
In fact something like Portal would be even less of a new IP seeing as it lifts the first person mechanics of Half Life 2 directly, and is in the same world.
- 1
-
Technically something like Spiderman isn't a new IP, it is a licensed IP. And it definitely doesn't carry the same risk factor as creating a new IP does
Bloodborne is 100% a new IP though. Having some design elements in common with their other games doesn't prevent that. It'd be like saying TLOU wasn't a new IP cause it had design elements in common with Uncharted, or Portal isn't a new IP cause it has elements of Half Life
-
I dont know if it's Phil so much as whoever is in charge of first party studios, Matt Booty
He has overseen a particularly poor bunch of years
-
-
1 hour ago, ghostz said:
I think everyone expected Starfield getting delayed, but what’s redfall?
Double self own
- 2
-
36 minutes ago, TLHBO said:
But people will still circle jerk Platinum because they want to be seen as cool.
They were always shit
- 1
-
-
-
1 hour ago, lostfool said:
I agree. When Square and Enix worked closely with Nintendo they made amazing high quality games. Now it's very hit and miss
Has nothing to do with Nintendo, but the fact they fired Sakaguchi and replaced him with a banker
They lost their eye for quality
-
33 minutes ago, Saucer said:
This big wave of consolidation sucks. It's the short road to killing off a lot of creativity.
Agreed
MS has killed gaming
- 2
-
21 minutes ago, Ramza said:
FFXIV? Who gives a fuck?
I platinum'd DQXI, easily their best game of last gen but that's one game from a series that gets a new entry once per gen.
FFXV was trash. FF7 Remake was trash. FFXVI looks like trash. And everyone forgot FF Stranger of Paradise even exist in the first place.
JRPGs
FFXIV and it's expansions are basically the best FF campaign since PS2 era and the scores reflect that
XVI is from the director of XIV. Man is a massive Matsuno fanboy so you know he's got the right inspiration and you can expect the quality direction so far to continue.
VII Remake was far from trash. Well at least 99% of it till the ending went retarded
Square still has a bunch of old hacks like Nomura shitting things up a bit but emerging talents like Yoshida and the Octopath team are coming to the forefront now
-
7 hours ago, Ramza said:
Both those games are infinitely better than 99% of games made by Square these days.
I mean, are you excited for Kingdom Hearts 4... you forgot it even existed, didn't you? Don't worry, so did everyone else. Or Forspoken, another forgotten, irrelevant piece of trash.
Most of the best games coming out of Square are remakes, remasters and ports of their classics and even they manage to fuck that up sometimes. A good example being the latest Chrono Cross remaster. Embarrassing trash.
The only good games are the occasional weird niche titles that come out of nowhere like Octopath Traveler, Triangle Strategy, NieR Automata. Once every few years basically.
DQXI was great. FFXIV has become the leading MMO. I think they just lack that recent game which has hit true top tier. FFXVI looks promising though
On the whole they have a pretty consistent output of solid games
They've dropped some duds too but maybe getting bought out will reduce their output of filler titles, get them on a path to higher quality of execution
- 1
-
14 minutes ago, jehurey said:
It'd actually be a pretty good acquisition to boost their PS+ extended catalogue.
At this point, I don't see why Konami wouldn't be a cheaper acquisition than Square Enix.
If Sony gets Square-Enix and Konami, you pretty much have an extensive PS1/PS2 library to offer digitally.
I wonder if their new games would turn exclusive, or if they still release multiplatform. Square makes alot of money on the Nintendo Switch.
Also, Sony doesn't really need to step on Nintendo's toes, and vice versa. This is another scenario where I could imagine Sony asking Nintendo "hey you wanna come in and buy 33%-50% of this?" and Square-Enix just continues making the games they were planning for the PS5 and Switch 1 and 2.
Konami is more expensive snd don't have much in the way of developers
They just have a couple big IP none of which is massively popular
-
Now he can play a version of Elden Ring that isn't a stuttering broken mess like PosC
- 1
- 3
-
3 hours ago, Remij said:
Switch servers TWO markets. The console market and the handheld market.
PS4 serves ONE market. The console market.
It's that simple.
PS4 > Switch
PC serves two markets, work and games.
PS4 serves one market
PS4 > PC
-
Avengers was a shit show. Not sure how you fuck up such a sure thing to make money
-
Lmao GD is a souls nerd
We should beat him up
- 2
-
1 minute ago, Remij said:
MS and Sony want studios regardless, I'd imagine.
The value of those studios would be relatively nothing without the IP to go along with them.. but presumably whoever buys the studios would probably be able to negotiate a better licensing deal, since it looks like that's the way they want to do it.
They aren't a multi billion dollar valuation without the IP IMO
-
I imagine you'd own the Arkham series, Injustice etc. But still need to license the characters to make use of it
WB should just sell the videogame rights indefinitely if they are serious about a sale. What they are selling is pretty worthless without the IP
PC Gamer: Starfield is just ugly No Man’s Sky (TLHBFR!!)
in System Wars
Posted
Xbox is where creativity goes to die