Remij

On par ROFL AMD needs to be 20% better or more, and even then people wont give a shit Kind of like Xbox. It can be 70% better visually and have better performance and will still only sell a 3rd of what Playstation does Dumbtre

3.6 billion is a tiny scratch on Nvidia's market cap

No new architecture... no new technologies... same price as the RTX 2080... Severely limited quantities.. France and Spain are only getting dozens of cards between them Gotta do better than that AMD

They were severely overvalued to begin with. This isn't a surprise to anyone paying attention. This is basically the market correcting itself. Great thing about this is that it's going to push Nvidia to smarten their ass up. Too bad AMD couldn't do that to Nvidia themselves through actual competition ...I'll make a thread on that though.

Which game are you talking about? C3 or C1? Because there was no game out at the time that was even close to C1, and with regards to C3... we're still comparing games to it 6 years later... The CryEngine was fine. It's an old engine that you're comparing against new engines. There's no game that looks better and runs at triple or quadruple the performance.

I never understood the viewpoint of criticizing a game for raising the bar looking towards the future by offering the option to push fidelity and effects farther than the current hardware can support. It's an argument by idiots who think that if a PC game isn't "maxed" that it's somehow a negative against the platform... despite the fact that would be still far and away the best looking/playing version. All PC games should be developed with visual effects and options that far exceed what the current hardware is capable of. Push LODs as far as possible, have incredibly detailed textures for

Imagine if they had 100-150m budget and updated their engine

That's why Crytek flourished on PC... then started console development and failed and destroyed their business Idiotre

It drops in a few areas, but it's mostly 60-70. If I turn down the AA, then yea it's possible. I told motherfuckers that C3 was still better looking than most current gen games, I think it was an argument referring to competing with Sony exclusives... but yes, I stand by it. Crytek is/was one of the most capable studios graphically. Sucks they decided to start focusing on consoles.. they could have raised the bar even further if they had stayed focused on only PC

Holy shit

What? Where did you hear that? There were apparently 800 people working on the game throughout development.. I'm not sure I believe that at all. Though they did reuse a lot of assets from RE7.

What dumb shit is this Damn though, best on PC 60fps AND 4K. LMAO HDR... it will probably be a garbage implementation like most recent games have been.

Could be. I'd be glad if it was at 5 million already. I think the split is higher though. Resident Evil is more recognizable as a Playstation brand game. Capcom has been heavily marketing the PS version. Whatever though.. it's selling great. Especially on PC. The game deserves it

I edited my post after. Give me what you think it is now.

Capcom said 3 mil sales.. that's counting digital... Give me numbers... what do you think it's at on each platform now?

Most games seem to be selling 3:1 or 70/30... plus Xbox sucks worldwide.. They're probably pretty accurate. Plus the Xbox OG version is garbage, and the PRO version looking sharper had resetera turds saying they were gonna buy it on PRO.. What do you peg them at?

The game was just announced at 3 million total sales last week... PC is 1/3 of that. PS4 is probably @ 2.5 mil, PC @ 1.2 mil and Lastbox @ 700K as of right now

Damn, KH3 selling crazy good. Good stuff. Also RE2 on Steam is doing incredible.. I'm sure the console versions are selling like crazy too still. The game could very well be close to 4-5 million at this point.

Off topic shit is fine as long as it's a thread made in good faith. Meaning you actually want to talk and discuss something... also, I wont merge threads that start off as clutter, but have evolved into an actual discussion or something interesting before I have read it. If you guys have an issue with that. Let me know.

I'm merging all clutter into this thread.

It just looks basic. Really dated. And while it's clean, the world aesthetic isn't very appealing, and it looks sterile. Was hoping cool destruction and nice effects would make up for it, but nah. That's just what it is. It's time to get it out and put it behind them.

By that tweet, it really sounds like Platinum fucked up again and they just figured out a nice way to say that PG is no longer a part of the project. Probably to save face for Platinum since this is yet another time where they've either not met standards or were behind in development or overbudget. They removed PG's name from the game completely.... you don't do that when your work you were contracted for was finished and it's "a job well done"....

I remember that

Metro Exodus is going to support it Anthem will support it shortly after launch Shadow of the Tomb Raider (apparently if it ever gets updated...) BF5 is supposed to be getting it as well, not that you care anymore lol Control from Remedy will support it Darksiders 3 Hitman 2 Hellblade Atomic Heart Overall about 30 games announced so far.

Yea, it's not counted at all. There's no scoring. The benchmark runs a section of the benchmark without DLSS first, and then with DLSS after.. then you get a screen comparing the FPS. It's actually its own separate "Feature Test" in the same category as the API Overhead test as well, so no worries.