Remij

4 minutes ago, JonB1 said:

Some people have kids and family to get home to . And stores have policies .

 

It was wrong for the people to get fired . The employees did nothing wrong . Anyone who thinks otherwise is wrong , or racist .

 

The end 

Jon... did you see the part about the store paying reparations back to minorities.... It's OBVIOUS AS FUCK that this store has an image to maintain... and this poor black woman was ready to tarnish the FUCK out of it if they didn't fire these employees for "unintentionally seeming racist".  I mean, by their own words they did nothing wrong.. but it could appear so... so FUCK EM.

Jesus  

25 minutes ago, jehurey said:

You don't know that they were "following policy" because if they have ever ALLOWED anybody into the store at closing time before...……..then that policy is now at the mployee's discretion.

 

You...…………….don't...………...KNOW...…...any of this, or how any of this went down.

 

You know exactly what I have been saying these past few posts...…….you're just trying to play dumb. lol

You don't know either..... and it's likely policy to allow the people in the store to finish their orders and close the shop down for others.  So this black woman sees some white people in the store and then assumes she was neglected because she was black..

WHERE Jerry, does it say that they've seen these employees treat black people differently before??  Where.

And you still haven't asked the question or establish how they treated black people during NORMAL WORKING HOURS?

It's funny how you chastise me for going by the information provided when YOU are the one that's assuming the employers have seen this bad behavior from them before...  

This is rich:

Quote

The bakery has also volunteered to participate in Portland's second "Reparations Happy Hour", a black-only event in which whites donate money, and the hosting business hands out $10 bills to all "black, brown, and minority ethnicities" who walk into the business.

Jesus fucking christ  

10 minutes ago, jehurey said:

No...….once again you are assuming things you don't know.

 

I love how you are AWARE that you are purposely making a naïve argument, based on technicalities that may be irrelevant based on what may have happened...……...and you're doing it specifically to fight me about it.

 

I love seeing you jump these hoops.

 

If the Employer has SEEN how these employees have treated OTHER PEOPLE at closing time...……...and know that they treated this black woman differently, that's all there to it, sweetheart.  And you know this.

 

But I'm not gonna stop you from your butthurt motivations. Never have. lol

So they've seen them treat other BLACK people or just OTHER PEOPLE differently???    This is a case of "They saw them treat white people better at closing time" and not "They saw them treat black people the same as white people before".... riiiiiight?

I like how you're talking about naiveté when it seems obvious that the ONLY fucking reason why they were fired was because the woman was black and the store just didn't want to even risk seeming insensitive EVEN THOUGH the employees were following POLICY and ANNNND the employer "doesn't consider them to be racist"... LOL

1 minute ago, jehurey said:

Except employees still interacted with this customer past 9pm.

 

They still represent the company, in this scenario.

 

I mean...………..why are trying to play naïve, you know exactly how these employees could still fuck up in this scenario.

 

The thing is that the customer would have to successfully demonstrate that you treated them in a way that was out-of-the-ordinary compared to how they treat other people. As we can see, the Employer certainly seems to think that's the case.

 

Dude...……...the mere fact that you are assuming so many things based on a GHOST post, with NO SOURCE, lol jesus.

Telling someone you're closed IS representing the company... and FOLLOWING policy.  People realize that when stores CLOSE it doesn't mean that employees are finished working  

"Impact outweighs intent"... I know you didn't INTEND to seem racist... but that's what it looked like when you were following our policy... so sorry... you're FIRED....

"Back to Eden Bakery"... lmfao you'd swear it was "Back to Africa Bakery" ....  What a bunch of TomFoolhurey  

10 minutes ago, jehurey said:

No, it does matter how you interacted with them.

 

If the Employer KNOWS how the employees have treat OTHER people at closing time, and notices that they treated this black lady differently...……..then they could determine that they did it because they judged her based on her color.

 

I love how you are trying to include me wherever possible...………..the butthurt is so real with you. LOL

Facts don't care about your feelings.  The store closed at 9... sometimes people forget to turn off their "open" signs.  You gotta stop a some point.  And the employer KNOWS and ADMITS they aren't racist... just that the poor soul who didn't get her last cupcake of the night felt bad  

But regardless of all that... Jon asked you what you would do if someone was suing you for how you treated them at your little store.  Well, if they were suing you... it's because you made them feel bad... so REGARDLESS of how you THINK you treated them... you made them feel bad.  You'd be asking yourself what you did wrong, and why you were being sued.

1 minute ago, JonB1 said:

If anyone thinks this is fair , they flat out hate white people and are racist .

 

It's the same thing as me watching people try to justify Roseanne y'all racist 

 

 

I like that even if you're following company procedure and guidelines and having problems with a potential customer, if they happen to be of a different race (let's be real here, white and black) then there are "racial implications"... such as... the white person is racist and the black person is innocent... and the white person should have thought about that before hand...  

4 minutes ago, jehurey said:

that's actually a clever line........................for me to have used for my side of the argument.

 

But its still something. LOL

Well, when the customer is always right, it really doesn't matter how you interacted with them.

And besides, this is all a joke anyway... lmao you building a Cyber Cafe and actually having customers ... lmao talk about hypotheticals.

Bu but Jerry, the customers always white!  

5 minutes ago, Cookester15 said:

A burden to get fired over following your employers protocols? Yeah I'd say that's a hardship. Getting fired is incredibly stressful. We don't know if these people were supporting children and what not. Please tell me you don't think they should have lost their jobs over this. 

Jehurey doesn't care.. he hates white people.  He's mad jealous as fuck in all actuality.  

So fucking stupid  

44 minutes ago, MalaXmaS said:

Playing Zelda BotW. I fucking love it. Tons of exploration and lots of oh shit I am too weak for this moments. 

 

Enjoy and savor that shit breh  

5 minutes ago, bhytre said:

https://www.twitch.tv/bryandechart

Connor's actor streaming his playthrough right now, still at the beginning chapters

He's married to the chick that plays Traci.

Detroitre loves this game so much he's watching streams of it  

2 minutes ago, Ike said:

So it is worth $60?

You're reading the impressions here and still need it spelled out for you? lol.. cmon man.  Yes, buy it and enjoy it.

1 minute ago, Twinblade said:

Reviewers tried so hard to hate on this game. Look at one of GS' cons:

 

'Some secondary characters exhibit an obvious lack of detail'.

 

Thats a ridiculous complaint, even a lot of the characters that only show up for a single chapter look better than 90% of the models from other games.

Yea, that's fucking stupid.   At one point, with all the main characters and secondary characters on screen at one time, I was like how the fuck is this all being rendered without any performance issues.

Reviewers were definitely hating and making whatever excuse they could to score it lower.

3 minutes ago, -GD- said:

God damn, Detroit owns  

All 3 stories are great so far.  I can't decide which one I like best  

The fucking graphics... 

Ok, Bloodstained: Curse of the Moon is cool.   I'm loving the music and it's just like NES Castlevania 3.   I fucking love it.  In all honesty, it's actually making me more hyped for Bloodstained: Ritual of the Night.  Which is obviously what it's meant to do.  Hopefully RotN turns out better than I think it will.  I'm still playing a wait and see with it.  I would have preferred a pixel art game like this, but we'll see how it goes.

Oh and I grabbed Dark Souls Remastered as well.  It looks and runs beautifully.  The temporal AA does an awesome job and thank fucking GOD for that motion blur setting.  

1 minute ago, Twinblade said:

 fixed. i've been working way too much lately and my mind is all over the place.

Don't wear yourself out too much tho breh, that ain't good for nobody.  Everything in moderation... even work. 

37 minutes ago, Ike said:

Is it more linear like the earlier Castlevania titles? 

 

Sort of. Theres  2-3 branching paths in each level but they all lead to the same location.

This tripped me out.  

3 minutes ago, Twinblade said:

Played through the first 2 stages of Bloodstained Curse of the Moon. Its alright, but very old school. Im more of a fan of modern metroidvania.

It's on my wishlist so I don't forget about it.  I definitely want to give it a try though.

22 minutes ago, Angel Jim said:

Jets take game one.

Ye boys  

1 hour ago, Rebel Rebel said:

How will GOW run on a ps4 vanilla?

Just fine....

until it kills it like it did mine  

Winnipeg Jets  

LET'S GO BOYS  

Let's go Jets  

Just beat God of War.

Final review - 9.75/10

Can I just say, that Atreus is BY FAR the best AI companion character in any game ever?  They fucking NAILED it.  Like holy shit.  And his arc throughout the game is just awesome.

Final Battle spoiler

Oh and then of couse (huge final spoiler)

So god damn godly.  This is the best game of the gen so far.  God damn Atreus.. I remember being a bit worried that he would be annoying.. lmao