Remij

Just now, Carlos Vela said:

Bought it off Facebook market place from some one that said he won it at a company raffle.   Dude even delivered to my house :)

Nice :) 

Just now, -GD- said:

LMFAO! that's actually a pretty awesome dig  

It is... but it's also wrong.  You don't just have free access to those games... you have to buy them or subscribe to GamePass.

4 minutes ago, Carlos Vela said:

I payed $370, no tax :)

Proof they have to pretty much give them away  

DF confirmed that Wolf 2 isn't running with Variable Rate Shading in any of the benches either.. so it's likely going to perform even faster in the near future.   (not that it needs it lmao)

Quote

What's all the more remarkable here is that I'm told that this build of Wolfenstein 2 does not include the Turing-specific variable rate shading optimisations we saw during Nvidia's press day during Gamescom, so there may be further improvements to come. All of which bodes well for RTX 2080 Ti. It's already phenomenal here, posting a 50 per cent improvement in frame-rates over GTX 1080 Ti.

How Vulkan is performing in general in games like Doom and Wolf 2 is just crazy impressive.  It wouldn't be a bad thing for more developers to start supporting it.

2 minutes ago, lynux3 said:

Nah dude, it's more powerful than a 1080.

I swearz  

TLHBFR  

Watch the game will come out for PS4... use checkerboard rendering.. or target 1440p.. or even 1080p.. and will run solid and not have dialed back graphics..  

2 minutes ago, Carlos Vela said:

$370

 

bangin deal

$500... and obsolete in a year or so  

3 minutes ago, bhytre said:

Fatality 

Lems are ALWAYS the ones to get the most butthurt  

4 minutes ago, Carlos Vela said:

Still 2nd place HDR and Atmos Support 

HDR AND Atmos support  

Xbox One X 30fps with drops and horrible input lag  

Just now, bhytre said:

$1250 card to play Xbox games, Xbox controller and other components not included  

$1000 on two Xboxes that don't have any exclusives and where it's games are best played elsewhere  

Actually... considering everything.. I would agree with you Lynux.  If you have a 1080 or 1080ti class gpu.. there's not much sense in buying these cards.. at least not yet.  We'll have to see how they perform with newer games that are better designed to take advantage of the improvements to the architecture.. but as it stands.. yea, you can safely pass on this and wait for 7nm next year.

That said... the 2080ti is a fucking monster.  The 2080 is a pretty bad proposition atm, but the 2080ti coming off a 980ti or something is a fucking huge jump.

The Vulkan performance with these gpus is just insane.  Wolfenstein 2 at 1440p maxed out hits 270+ fps average with like 250fps being the lowest  

4K we're damn near 200fps and 150fps being the lowest.  

Interesting to note that Wolf 2 is a game that utilizes FP16.  Could be an indication of things to come with games that properly support what GPUs with double rate fp16 can do.  Also it's not clear... (unlikely) that Wolf 2 in this instance is utilizing the Variable Rate Shading yet.. which I imagine would require a patch.

This bodes well for Doom Eternal  

29 minutes ago, lynux3 said:

Looks like the general consensus here is that it's not worth it. Like I said previously, this is definitely a generation to skip.

Here?  lol.. this isn't exactly the place where I'd conduct a consensus of the worth of these cards.  Not to mention that... but it completely depends on who you're talking to and what their definition of "worth it" is... It's not just gamers who will use these cards...  and performance is strong all around.

These results also are on games which aren't exactly built to take advantage of these cards.  Some of the results are astounding really... even despite that... still  35-50% faster than the previous gen card... I mean.. what are people honestly expecting?

Give it some time.  There's a lot of new shit here not currently being exploited... and I'm not just talking about DLSS.

Made a new post below.

2 minutes ago, DynamiteCop! said:

Really? I always went into the start menu, I just thought that's how you did it.

 

haha I did that at first too until I found out about it.  Much quicker this way :) 

Just now, DynamiteCop! said:

How did you even figure that out, that's cool how quick it is but odd how they changed it yet said nothing.

It was the same in FH3.

4 minutes ago, DynamiteCop! said:

How do you get into the photomode in this demo? I saw the drone mode but no photomode. 

Press and hold up on the d-pad.

1 minute ago, DynamiteCop! said:

It's definitely a more unstable image, go to the city scape at the end of the video and look at the buildings, a lot of flicker and fuzz.

Yea I noticed that as well towards the end, also there's a scene in the middle where he's climbing up the latter which you can see shimmering on compared to the Native+TAA side.

I wouldn't say there's a lot though.. and I wouldn't call it fuzz.  I'd say there's some shimmering in highly contrasted elements.  Overall though.. quite impressive.  These are early implementations as well.  Nvidia did say that these neural networks could improve over time.

Overall though, quite impressive... and this is sitting right in front of the screen. 

Another comparison... just a faint bit softer on the DLSS side imo.. but the performance jump speaks for itself.

DLSS will be a huge advantage in games that utilize it.

Here's the video:

Initial DLSS vs TAA comparison with FF15

TAA

DLSS

Impressive OC'ing results

Just a preview  

WTF happened with the 2080 there?  Must be a VRAM bottleneck or something.

Will start posting the reviews soon. 

https://gematsu.com/2018/09/castlevania-requiem-symphony-of-the-night-rondo-of-blood-rated-for-ps4-in-korea

Will obviously likely be announced at TGS.

I'm just gonna come out and say it... I'm absolutely port begging for this game!  PLEASE bring this motherfucker to Steam/Switch/XO as well.  I've been wanting SotN on PC for forever now.