Remij

4 minutes ago, jehurey said:

Very smart of them to give PC users an open beta, and basically try the game for free.

 

My understanding is that Call of Duty has never really blown up on PC, but if this starts getting a big PC crowd, they will buy the game at full price.

With the Battle Royale shit they realize how important it is for them to get the PC audience if they want to compete with games like Fortnite and PUBG.

6 minutes ago, Jon2B said:

A 500 dollar PC is a budget PC.

A 500 dollar xbox is comparable to a 1000 plus dollar PC

 

I'm still waiting for you to debate this. You wont, because you cant.

 

And lmfao at the other nonsense you just spit up. I should compare it to Xbox, since YOU are the one that says a 1060 is comparable. It isn't. I know that. You are the one that pretends to not see it.

A 1060 is comparable to the X1X...in most games.  A X1X is comparable to a 1070 in a couple... and it's not even close to a 1080... as you guys said it was.. lmao.  You're retarded.  

You're still waiting for me to debate something... that I'm not debating  

You really ARE slow as fuck man.. jesus

And that PC does more than an Xbox... much more.  It's a better value over all  

Just now, Carlos Vela said:

Lmao right,  PC Last gen sound

 

guess ill just get the superior X1X version 

 

remipeeHBR

Just now, Jon2B said:

Maybe if I ask the question 3 times you can answer it ? No . No you can't LOL

The Xbox One X IS a budget $500 PC... that sadly can't play half the games that release for the PC platform. LOLL  

You bought an $800 PC... to apparently NOT play games... or you did... you just don't want to admit it.  Who knows? Who cares?  

Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if you bought it just to compare it to your Xbox One X and claim that you're having so much problems with it and hate it... lmao Idiots like you wasting your money.  That's why I'm answering the way I am... nobody into PC gaming would buy a $500 PC... they would save their money and buy a good PC when they can afford one.  Xbox is the compromise...

LOL.. the price/performance poverty club  

2 minutes ago, DynamiteCop! said:

This 

 

 

 

is graphically identical to this

 

 

 

the way they are presented is different

 

 

No... one is graphically superior to the other.  I definitely see more clarity in one vs the other... and when the other displays at 2x the fps... it's quite easy to see which one looks superior in motion.

1 minute ago, Jon2B said:

What do you get with a 500 dollar PC 

You don't... you save that money until you can buy a real system... you DEFINITELY don't go spending it on an Xbox One console  

Just now, Jon2B said:

What do you get with a 500 dollar PC ?

 

 

The ability to upgrade when you have the money to buy a real system.  You're not stuck with garbage  

Just now, Jon2B said:

I needed a new PC . 

Oh, so they DO have other uses... cool.

1 minute ago, Truno2018 said:

Making diss tracks in 2018. 

You playing DQ11 breh?

7 minutes ago, Jon2B said:

All I see is the private beta 

Sorry, I guess X owners are left out to dry again  

Just now, DynamiteCop! said:

This is not correct, you're adjusting its scale for output. 

It is correct.  Is the rendering of the image handled by the engine Dynamite?  

And I find it hilarious you're arguing the angle that you are... you spend an extra $500 on an Xbox for exactly that... rofl.

And the fact that you're arguing this when you know that PC versions of games have better quality settings for various aspects to the graphics... alongside higher resolutions and the ability to display many many more fps.

On X1X.. you're getting a $500 experience...  sub native half the time... less quality settings than the PC versions... and 2-3x less performance.  It's a wash.

Just now, Jon2B said:

I ahvent even bought a game for PC . I might buy planet coaster . It's on sale 

Good for you... you spent $800+ on something you're not going to use... and you claim my purchase is a waste of money 

2 minutes ago, DynamiteCop! said:

Resolution is not a graphical setting, it's simply the scale and measurement of clarity in which graphics are presented. You're not bettering or worsening a setting within the engine or the render handling of the game, you're manipulating the way in which it is displayed.

 

Which is pertinent to GRAPHICS....  

And you ARE bettering a setting within the engine to render the game you fuckhead...   

Jesus  

1 minute ago, Jon2B said:

Here's a reason . To get a 4k gaming machine , you can get an X , or a 1500 dollar PC 

And to get games you get the PC.. like you did  

Just now, Jon2B said:

I don't see the open beta on Xbox 

 

It should be there.

Not only this... but when I say something about PC being better than Xbox One X, Dynamite throws a tissy and claims that PC is dead... but in other threads against cows and sheep talking about PC he say "NO PC is doing better than ever... yadda yadda"

This guy says whatever the fuck suits his narrative.

FACT.  PC is more powerful than Xbox

PC is better than Xbox

PC gets WAY MORE games than Xbox

Xbox LOST this gen

NO reason to own one

6 minutes ago, Jon2B said:

No .

Then play it on your X dumbass  

Oh wait, you'd rather play on your PC  

It's cool  

8 minutes ago, Aza Team 2019 said:

Yeah Zone of Enders PS2 and 4K on Pro look the same. Resolution isnt everything but its a factor, now that we hit such high resolutions though its NOT that much of factor. 480p->720p for consoles was life changing. 1080p-> 4K not so much.

They don't look the same.  One looks visually better than the other.  One is graphically sharper, more stable, and detailed.

The hilarious thing is that Dynamite when calling out the difference between the base version of a game and the X1X version of a game said something to the effect of it's "almost next gen"...  He's done this many times before  

Just now, DynamiteCop! said:

I went down that "fucking hole" with you and this is your rebuttal? Whoosh.

 

No you didn't..  You stated something completely wrong...

Resolution isn't an aspect of graphics he says...  

Fidelity isn't a part of graphics he says...

You're a fucking CLOWN Dynamite.

Just now, DynamiteCop! said:

Resolution has never been "graphics". 

Do me a favor.. stop talking to me.  You're retarded as fuck.

Just now, The Mother Fucker said:

You could probably mine some good amount of ethereum hash with those GPUs.    Although you have to steal $2,200 dollars to get those GPUs to make any gains. 

 

 

 

  

Remij which are you going to get, the 2080 or 2080Ti , Founders or third party brand?

I got the 2080Ti Founders Edition.  So sexy  Can't wait till it gets here  

Just now, DynamiteCop! said:

Resolution is a metric of fidelity and performance, not graphical setting. A game at 4K can be graphically identical to a game at 1080p. 

 

 you're getting dumb

You said debating graphics.... resolution isn't graphics now?  You wanna go down this fucking hole with me Dynamite?  

Just now, Twinblade said:

I was always on the side of Tomb Raider > Uncharted until the rebooted series. They started losing focus on what the series is about and each new game is more over-designed than the last. The puzzles in Shadow are good, but if you actually think this game or the last 2 can hold a candle to UC4......:D

UC4 sucks man.. I dunno what to tell you.  Rise was better than UC4 and this is too so far... by far.  

6 minutes ago, Jon2B said:

There is a public beta ? How does it run on your PC?

Better than Xbox... by far.  

1 minute ago, DynamiteCop! said:

Notice all of your discussion about consoles is debating graphics until it's flipped on its head, then you backpedal to performance.

 

PC is a joke.

Shut the fuck up clown   Notice how your graphics drop to 1080p when 60fps is involved?  

Xbox sucks and your console is going to be replaced by streaming before you ever get something more powerful than PC  

It's game over.. deal with it and stop whining.