Remij

Because the same was true with Rise.. and input lag isn't only tied directly to fps... running higher fps is but one thing that affects input lag. Monitors also have much faster response times and refresh-rates... not to mention disabling vsync and using gsync vastly improves responsiveness.

Which NEVER hits a steady 60fps.. .has juddering and screen tearing galore... and terrible input lag No... we're good.

LMFAO... did you see that AA setting you fucking retard? He changes it part way through... it was at SMAA4X... ROFL... he changed it after to OFF and the fps jumped to 90... then turned the settings to Ultra and the fps was at 50... X1X = somewhere between a 1060 and 1070... With horrible tearing, input lag, and fps drops

You're being just as stupid... anyway I'm not arguing that one resolution is vastly better or worse than the other... what I AM saying is that this EXPLAINS the performance.. especially when you compare to the PC... which they did.

You're right... I wont... because it's LESS likely... What you idiots don't grasp is that NXG's findings fall in line with what I myself suggested before I even KNEW his video existed... If you understand the bottlenecks of the given platforms and gpus.. it explains why we're seeing what we're seeing. All you come to the table with is "bu bu DF said so.. X1X is a super console"

You even have Dynamite right at the top of this page say that "they shouldn't be analyzing pre-release code" lmao... I'm fine with DF... but they make mistakes sometimes. I can admit when they do because I don't have a fucking dog in this fight lmao... The lemmings are the ONLY motherfuckers who get butthurt about stuff like this. Just deal with it idiots.

Indeed.

Fixed your title for you..

No.. Uh...because it can? Judging from the theoretical performance of the part PC ALWAYS has overhead that isn't there on consoles... this is a constant... Given the INFORMATION WE HAVE... It's very indicative... and explains exactly why I think the way I do.. And what the developers do in their patches and what Nvidia does in their drivers are two different things....

A few people seem to think this is a cross gen title. PS4/PS5.. It wouldn't surprise me. Looks awesome though.. hopefully it comes to PC. Someone on resetera said it was announced for PC as well but I can't find any confirmation on that.. I think he was dreaming.

This world is so fucked

I think those fps drops are accurate... taking into account the scaling to 3200x1800 and judging by the PC benchmarks.... that's why I said it explains things

It's right there on the store page... lol

Oh for fuck sakes... Just a bit ago you were fine with comparing it to those PC benchmarks... I even specifically said that they were using an old driver in those benchmarks too... I didn't see you holding off judgement until the final game is released with patch and driver... And I never said there was only 3 set dynamic resolutions... I said it doesn't shift line by line every second... You're speaking out of your ass right now Dynamite... you can get away with this with other posters but not me. I see right through you. It's not 100% fixed... that much is obviou

This seems pretty much confirmed

The fact that he came out with that number isn't odd at all... the dynamic scaler doesn't shift line by line... it has set values that it will drop to or raise to given a certain performance metric... It's not odd.. it's understandable... and lends credibility to him that he's right about it being dynamic. I already explained to you that I understand the ways the statement can be interpreted... but I'm slapping you in the face with very rational reasons why it's likely NOT the way you want it to be... If the normal res is 100% 3584x2016... as both DF and NXG agree... then the fac

Emulatendo Switch... best on PC

I know that NXGamer counted a dynamic resolution... I know that it's MORE likely that it means what I think it means than what you think it means. If it didn't... then it wouldn't need to be there to begin with.... Again, I already told you that at the end of the day, it doesn't matter if it does or doesn't... but if it DOES... then it EXPLAINS things... just as it did with FC5... But noooo you simply can't let that go... lmao. And congrats... I read the same comment that you did... LMAO This was the same excuse that was used for Far Cry 5... "bu but maybe it changed since whe

I just think it's hilarious the angle that he's playing in this thread... like I'm hell starved on degrading the X or something... like as if I don't speak highly of it 99% of the time... ROFL. He just got insta-bitchmade when I posted the NXGamer numbers. This motherfucker telling me I'm scouring the net looking for ways to hate on X1X... rofl... this is the same guy that emailed Gamespot asking the reviewer why Xbox One wasn't listed on the review page

https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/p/forza-horizon-4-demo/9p8cp1l72jxs?activetab=pivot%3aoverviewtab Please let this be so

lmao

Yea, well when your consoles misses out on tons of games and has no exclusives... you basically have nothing left other than that tiny bit of resolution

I know. It's the strongest.

lmao... as someone in the comments posted... the X Enhanced trailer says "Native 4K - highest gameplay resolution" It's fucking dynamic... lmao.. DynaRaped

I use it as an explanation to account for performance differences.. which make sense. Dynamite's acting like saying it drops res is the end of the fucking world.. and that I'm saying X1X is weak or some shit because of it.. lmao. NO REMIJ IT DOESN'T!!! DIGITAL FOUNDRY SAID NO!!