-
Content Count
39,395 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
147
Content Type
Calendar
Profiles
Forums
Everything posted by Remij
-
AMD 5800X (Zen 3) vs 10900K in Ashes of the Singularity
Remij replied to Remij's topic in System Wars
Yea, hopefully. Damn though.. the CPUs apparently have 20% IPC increase, and can boost up to 5GHz.. That's what the rumor is at the moment. 400mhz+ over the previous Zen 2 CPUs. -
AMD 5800X (Zen 3) vs 10900K in Ashes of the Singularity
Remij replied to Remij's topic in System Wars
CPU actually -
Just compare the green bars from the top (5800X) to the botton (10900K). 133fps average on the Zen 3.. and 114fps on the Intel. This is an 8 core AMD vs 10 core Intel.. This bench is HEAVILY multi threaded to take advantage of cores.. Holy shit.. utter domination.
-
He just spent 7.5B... yea, this is all he can afford
-
You idiots don't seem to learn.. do you? I said it's POSSIBLE... because they CAN charge whatever they want. And I've already PROVED that point. I never said it was going to happen... There doesn't need to be precedence for it to be a possibility. This could be the very first time Nintendo does it... or not. Stay mad because I said there was a possibility though
-
CONSOLES.... handhelds are different. Although... MAYBE you could call the WiiU a mid gen Wii refresh
-
No. When game prices increase.. it sets the new standard of acceptability. The consumer decides what is ultimately acceptable. There's no set time when these things "take effect"... it happens during a next gen transition because it gives them an excuse... and thus makes it "more acceptable"... If pubs decide $70 works... they can charge $70 where they want. We'll see if they do on Switch or not.
-
Before Sony and MS released their "pro" consoles... was it easy to find examples of mid-gen refreshes before Now look... Nintendo's doing it too
-
I just gave you an example of it happening right before your eyes... Games are games... if $70 becomes accepted on some platforms, publishers will charge that everywhere they release their games. It's a new standard. 3rd parties can do it if they want.. which was my entire point. I said it was possible.. and uncertain what they would do with regards to Switch. The only thing I said definitively is that they have the choice. So... I guess we're done here.
-
Nintendo MAY NOT raise their price... because their games don't really drop in price the same way the others do. But that doesn't change the fact that it's still a possibility that 3rd parties could do it if they wanted to
-
We're LITERALLY seeing it right now. Publishers are deciding on their own, to raise their next gen game prices to $70.. whether MS or Sony follows suit or not... lmao
-
MSRP is irrelevant. I already told you.. publishers can do what they want. $60 is a suggested price. If 3rd parties want to make bigger games on Switch, they could do so and charge more. MSRP is a suggested acceptable price... but pubs can charge whatever they feel people will pay. Up until now... that was $60 for standard games... but with this coming gen, that's changing. If making bigger and better Switch games requires more costly carts.. or for whatever reason... publishers can charge that.. if they feel people will pay for it.
-
See.. you already went back on your argument. Glad to see you know that I'm right... and since you've probably looked it up, now have a better understanding of what MSRP means.. and who decides game prices. Glad I could inform you. And yes... I'm sure you'll be waiting for the next time you can start a losing argument with me... just to argue... all night long... like it hasn't happened a million times before.
-
They can charge what they want. PERIOD.
-
No... if a publisher says a game is $10 more... then they are charging over the MSRP... If Sony's MSRP for games is $60.. and some 3rd party ships a $70 game... it's not MSRP...
-
Well it's funny... you were bitching before that they release one every year.. and said they just copy and paste them... but when they actually go out and develop new tech, new models, and change up the game.... you're claiming they're 'taking time off'... lmao They can't win with you. Why put the onus on Forza? That has been the studio that's propped up a lot of MS' failings in the past.. they deserve the extra time for once. 343i is who failed MS this time around.. and it's MS' fault that none of their other studios had anything ready either.