Remij

How are you getting the frame data?

My CPU is still holding me back at 1080p resolution

LOL ok. Go

Yes... probably sitting unused in warehouses because people are buying Intel CPUs and Nvidia GPUs

Vega's are going for $350-450. You can get a 2080ti for $1100. So your cards worth a 3rd that mine is... and you get a 3rd of the performance.... and neither are using any hardware to accelerate RT.

Not to PC gamers they aren't. People who GAME on PC... overwhelmingly choose Nvidia.

The hilarious thing about that graph is that AMD's APUs are included. Nvidia is destroying them in the dGPU market.

Very VERY limited in scope.

This is a very limited in scope demo Relax bud.

^exactly Devs will be smart about it. It's not going to completely change the image at first... it's going to be the subtle things. Shadows might look "similar" but what they will be is consistent.. and not show all the scaling artifacts and alignment issues that traditional shadow maps will have. You know.. the jagged stair-stepping edges that crawl.. and with RT shadows, you can show shadows for finer detail geometries... which traditional methods would likely miss because shadow map scaling. What it's going to do is help everything sit and feel more grounded in th

I dunno. The benchmark just gives you a score and doesn't give you framerate details. Maybe I'll run it in a bit and see more or less how much it drops.

Does a pretty good job of explaining the basics of what a BVH is and how it works at a really high level. You can download their benchmark test and try it out. https://wotencore.net/en/

Asgard's Wrath - 92 Disco Elysium - 91

I also laughed when he said they need to focus on getting "competent ports" of good games on Switch

It doesn't matter where the pictures come from. My opinion isn't changing. I posted pictures from the game. It's ugly on Switch. DF images or not. DF opinion or not. Your opinion or not. Maybe you should make a thread about DF's opinion on this game... because... it's not applicable here in this one.

I know, right. The money they'll make from this will make that a fart in the wind though.

No. They are irrelevant to the factual aspects of the article. Headlines and articles can vary WILDLY from the facts. Opinions aren't facts. Those are Digital Foundry's pictures... so I stated them. Here's another picture NOT from Digital Foundry. Yea..... no. It's ugly.

They're just going to fuck up again. What's the point? Nintendo isn't actually fixing the problem.. as evidenced by their Joycon lite. If you spend $30 on some cheap shit.. you'll just waste your money. Just spend $60 on the Pro controller, and ditch the shitty joycons. You might have the odd d-pad fuck up with the pro controller.. but you wont have drifting analog issues.

Headlines are the final word... says Jerry. Nope... those pictures ARE what they ARE. They speak for themselves. There's no changing that the PS4 version looks like that... and the Switch version looks like that. Wrong in your assumption that I posted from the video... wrong about everything. You're just speculating and assuming... and trying to add irrelevant context to what I've posted... which DOESN'T CHANGE what I've posted... at all. DF said what I said they did... and they posted those screenshots.

^still only talking about me

The headline doesn't change the pictures. Their opinion doesn't change the FACT. The FACT is that the pictures I posted.. are what the game looks like.. and what the game looks like... is the only relevant thing to what I was posting. Perhaps you'd be wise to stop assuming things in the future... since you've fully admitted your entire premise for your argument in this thread was based off of a wrong assumption. I'm glad I corrected THAT attempt to mislead.

More speculation. You're definitely off topic and have derailed this thread. I just gave you the chance to get back on topic and you're still talking about me and speculating about me. Dance for me Jehurey I know you'll continue to do this. It's not within your power to stop.

I never said they did. I said the headline was irrelevant. Those pics though... are VERY relevant. Digital Foundry's opinion on them doesn't make them sharper, include more detail, and bigger. NO headline does. It's irrelevant.

Their conclusion.. and their headline doesn't change the pics. Their approval doesn't matter... it never did, and never will. The best thing... is that your assumption was WRONG. That's what happens when you make assumptions.