54212

2 minutes ago, Substatic said:

 

Yeah.

 

 

They have The Jacobin listed as high in factual reporting. 

1 minute ago, Mr. Impossible said:

What are they? 

Neocon grifters.

Just now, Substatic said:

 

Run away by spamming studies and data that you can't refute? 

You're samming studies you found on Reddit that you haven't read and don't have the education to analyze. You argue politics like a 12-year-old.

3 minutes ago, Substatic said:

 

You have to prove the people actually RIOTING where there due to politics and not random people just trying to loot or blow shit up.  Time to get a new "degree".

 

You're giving opinions and theories. Give peer reviewed studies like I did.

 

You think that out of 450 violent protests with thousands upon thousands of acts individual violence, there were only about 23 that were politically motivated? You think that database is pretty accurate? Does that at all seem like a reasonable conclusion? No really. Is it?

2 minutes ago, Substatic said:

So I'm just gonna' ignore him

Run away, coward. 

13 minutes ago, Substatic said:

Post every encyclopedia entry and PHD study on The Southern Strategy?

You posted every encyclopedia entry and PhD study on The Southern Strategy? See and now you're just resorting to dumb exaggeration. 

1 minute ago, Substatic said:

Prove they were all political violence. (With citation). You know some random black guy throwing a brick doesn't HAVE to be political......right?

The CSIS own dataset says there were around 450 violent protests in 2020 alone. Not 450 violent individual acts, but 450 violent protests. That means the number of violent individual acts was almost certainly exponentially more. Yet they were only able to categorize 23 individual violent acts. We also know the protests were mainly leftwing BLM and Antifa protests, so the number of leftwing acts of violence is being vastly undercounted.

Yet you act like the database is definitive. That's how dumb you are.

Your fact check site has The Lincoln project listed as centrist. 

I've never met someone who thinks arguments from authorit

1 minute ago, Substatic said:

 

And your job is to show this is false with citation. You think it's false because "muh feels" and that trash degree.

 

I've now posted 2 highly valid sources and you can't respond with anything. It's great winning so easily here.  

Degrees. Plural. 

I think the study lacks internal validity because it's not able to categorize the vast majority of political violence as left or right as I've shown. It's a shit study. And all you have left to retreat to is mindless arguments from authority.

Sub is a great name for you because I've never seen an adult this mindlessly submissive to arguments from authority. Christ maybe the Sihks suck afterall. That would be disappointing.

1 minute ago, Substatic said:

 

I don't see the issue with this....

And that shows your own bias and why you're so terrible at analysis.

Just now, Substatic said:

 

Your low IQ has failed you in this thread.

 

You have to offer citation refuting both of my highly reputable sources. Not giving me your opinions.  I don't come in here and start posting shit bin blogs. Get on my level.

 

 

 

You don't even know the difference between objective analysis and opinion. Again, their own dataset claims there were 450 violent protests in 2020 alone but they were only able to categorize 23 of them as left or right. They methodology doesn't accurately measure left-right political violence at all but you're treating it as bulletproof because you're that much of a mindless sheep.

They have Fox News listed as Extreme but MSNBC listed as merely Left. You're doing great with the sources again, Sub. 

This is fun. They have  The Atlantic listed as more centrist than the NYTimes and WaPo. 

Just now, Substatic said:

 

Yes you corrected a false statement. You should stop making those all the time here.

There are so many of these fake lefty "fake check" sites they blur together.

Getting back to yours, they have The Atlantic as centrist to center-left. LOL

Just now, Substatic said:

 

What...

 

CNN - Media Bias/Fact Check (mediabiasfactcheck.com)

 

They are listed as "Mixed Fact" (which is bad) and Left Bias. CNN sucks dick.

 

Lmao this liar caught lying.

 

"Ayo I took a course in Social Studies when I was at Rutgers, I can now say the southern strategy is fake without citation!". Rofl.

I immediately correct it when I saw the error. Try again.

15 minutes ago, Substatic said:

So you have no source to refute my "Very High Fact" and "Least Biased" one? Get. The. Fuck. Out. Of. Here.  This is a direct and undebatable L.

Mediabiasfactcheck.com it has NPR listed as only slightly left.

15 minutes ago, Substatic said:

Tell me why you think a peer reviewed source is wrong because some county college politics course.

I already did, and UC Berkeley is universally considered one of the best universities in the world. You're acting like a spastic retard now because you got called out.

According to CSIS' own dataset there were over 450 violent protests in 2020 along but they were only able to categorize 23 of them as left or right, yet you're such a moronic sheep that you think their database is accurate.

How did you get this way? Did your parents cane you if you questioned their authority? 

5 minutes ago, Substatic said:

 

Reddit? You "think" it's horse shit? Sit the fuck down kid. A subjective analysis from you means fucking nothing. Cite a counter study from a reputable soucre.

 

 Center for Strategic and International Studies - Media Bias/Fact Check (mediabiasfactcheck.com)

 

 

 

 

Get fucking rekt with this shitty blog/opinion post you just wrote in response to a study by a "Very High Fact" and "Least Biased" org. Cite the counter source showing their specifics Numerics are wrong you god damn clown . I want to see what piece of shit blog you just quoted. 

I didn't use any blog. I'm a Cal alumnus and a political scientist trained in statistics and probability and research methodology. I pulled up their methodology and read it, you idiot.

You've haven't countered a single criticism I made of the CSIS database. As always you rely on arguments from authority, in this case yet another hack lefty "fact check" site. You're the biggest sheep on here.  You have no ability to think for yourself.

Go set yourself on fire and think about what a failure you are.

37 minutes ago, Mr. Impossible said:

 

The meaning of the thread was given many times before and in detail. You were just being a petty cunt and desperate to use the little "power" you have on the forum. 

Dude you were one of the most corrupt mods on here.

Remember when you got upset at me and deleted my post history thinking I'd be mad and instead I thought it was hilarious that you take this shit that seriously?

Go cry in your pillow. 

14 hours ago, Substatic said:

No, you  only regret it after you found out the right has exponentially more political violence.  Including DePepe, who we now know is far right and did it due to far right conspiracy theories.

Jerry wastes everyone's time with sperg arguments. You waste everyone's time with shit studies you haven't read.

I read through the CSIS database of domestic terrorism you cited and it's horseshit. Both its internal and external validity are poor. It doesn't come close to accurately measuring what it's attempting to measure. For example when Antifa and BLM were rioting en masse in 2020 (and attacking government buildings in Portland and Seattle nightly for months), it barely captures any of that political violence.

Quote

Finally, there was often limited information available on motivations for violent incidents, particularly regarding violence during riots—including objects such as Molotov cocktails thrown by unknown individuals—and vehicle attacks at demonstrations. TNT maintained a high standard of proof and excluded incidents for which a clear political motive could not be determined. Consequently, the data set may understate the number of attacks. For example, there were approximately 450 violent protests between May and August 2020, based on ACLED data. Yet TNT only verified 12 incidents of far-left terrorism during that period, since most of the violence did not meet the definition of terrorism. Similarly, though some sources recorded over 100 far-right vehicle attacks at protests in 2020, TNT
only verified 11 as meeting the definition of terrorist attacks.

Then the researchers employ glaring category errors by counting misogynistic violence, abortion violence, and attacks on journalists and the media as rightwing violence but not leftwing violence. Antifa is notorious for attacking journalists and political speakers, pro-life centers are repeatedly attacked, and the sexually predatory behavior of so-called male feminists is so common that it's become a well-established meme. 

Quote

 

Far-right terrorism refers to the use or threat of violence by subnational or non-state entities whose goals may include racial or ethnic supremacy; opposition to government authority; anger at women, including from the involuntary celibate (or “incel”) movement; belief in certain conspiracy theories, such as QAnon; and outrage against certain policies, such as abortion.

Far-left terrorism involves the use or threat of violence by subnational or non-state entities that oppose capitalism, imperialism, and colonialism; advocate black nationalism; pursue environmental or animal rights issues; espouse pro-communist or pro-socialist beliefs; or support a decentralized social and political system such as anarchism.

 

Then again it's still not as comically bad as the ADL's database but that's throwing the bar into the Marianas Trench.

Dude, stop copying shit you find on Reddit and do some actually research for once.

Why are the worst people on here all progressives? Could it be something about the ideology attracts dirtbags looking for a crumb of power and self-worth? 

Just now, jehurey said:

........and its clearly working.

 

 

Oh man, he's so mad right now, he's trying to derail so hard to talk about me.

Look at how deflated-sounding your post is. 

Just now, jehurey said:

He's the one who bought Twitter at $54.20 a share

It's trading at $53 right now. Oh noes. Meanwhile he's the world richest man you're an unemployed middle-age man living at his mum's house, and you think he's as dumb as you are? 

1 minute ago, jehurey said:

He really gets mad when he gets called an incel to his face.

And now you're already down to U Mad. 

Are you denying that you live at your mum's house? Yes or no? Wasn't your excuse last time something like, "Yes but they own a second home in Mexico and they live their. All the old cars parked at my house? My brother's visiting."

Do you have a girlfriend in Canada too? 

Just now, Goukosan said:

 

Again you're trying to create an argument for me...

You got caught flat out lying. 

3 minutes ago, jehurey said:

@Goukosan He's now trying to rely on a Twinblade post to save his ass

Jerry running to his little slimeball sidekick for moral support.