54212
-
Content Count
3,277 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
6
Content Type
Calendar
Profiles
Forums
Posts posted by 54212
-
-
Your link said he gave the speech at the 1st Bálványos Summer Free University and Student Camp, not CPAC.
Why are you lying?
-
3 minutes ago, Ike said:
So if he’s so worried about people turning to abortion, incel Saucer must be totally for a well-funded and comprehensive sex education program for public schools right? With classes on the proper use of birth control and free access for all those who wish to use it right?
I'm pro-choice, you fool.
-
19 hours ago, Substatic said:
They can be extremely political in their personal life, as long as they don't bring it to the NBEC.
Great, do they? How do you know? A fake lefty fact-checking site told you so?
Meanwhile:
And you keep ducking this question: By what authority is the NBER the "official" determinate?
-
11 hours ago, Goukosan said:
He provided it and predictably you had nothing of substance.
You're asking for a standard of proof that you yourself cannot come close to providing.
Hold that L Saucer.
He didn't even address my question. Reread it.
11 hours ago, Goukosan said:You're asking for a standard of proof that you yourself cannot come close to providing.
He boasted he could objectively prove the pro-life position is a poor position to hold. That's on him, not me.
Meanwhile 60m children killed by abortion since 1973. 60,000,000.
11 hours ago, Goukosan said:Hold that L Saucer.
No I'll leave it on your forehead, thanks.
-
18 hours ago, Substatic said:
Now you're just trying to get the last post in as if it changes this from not being countered yet
You lied when you said, "Abortion rates still remain high." As you said, you don't know.
Why did you lie?
18 hours ago, Substatic said:Disprove or counter the above facts and experts.
If we accept the numbers for increased mortality rates for women due to abortion bans, the increased number of deaths pales to the number of children killed by abortion. It's not even close. It's around 60m in the US alone since Roe.
-
Just now, Substatic said:
Not sure.
Right, you're full of shit.
Sit down, clown.
Said with love. I'm getting lunch.
-
1 minute ago, Substatic said:
Biden's NBEC director, Brian Deese, is not a as good of a source as the NBEC.
Do you know who's even on the eight-person NBEC board who makes the determination? Do you know what their politics are? Do you know how objective they are? I'll take a leap of faith here and say no.
2 minutes ago, Substatic said:You're not answering the question. Is your answer lefty journalists?
-
1 minute ago, Substatic said:
Abortion rates still remain high
How high compared to pre-Roe?
-
10 minutes ago, Substatic said:
This is not a real counter-citation.
I gave you one. Biden's NEC director from like last week.
And you're still ducking the question: By what authority is the NBER the "official" determinate?
Isn't cowardice one of the worst traits for a Sikh?
-
1 minute ago, Substatic said:
And here I was.
Expecting Saucer to provide peer reviewed or equally ground-breaking studies to counter all of mine. All of which directly agree with me.
I was expecting too much from a conservative I suppose. Oh well, I hope you like this L you were just given.
60m butchered in the US alone since Roe and you're too much of a coward to even try and defend it.
-
2 minutes ago, Substatic said:
What do you mean. The claim in the OP is proven by EPI.
You're backing it. I simply said the sources weren't credible.
-
32 minutes ago, Substatic said:
You're trying to debate with the wrong person, you're going to get absolutely fucked when going against me on an objective scientific debate. I remember ass blasting a couple of your cronies on climate and covid a while back here.
Dude you're about as intimidating as a toddler.
The pro-life side simply shoots back: Hey how many innocent children did you murder with abortion? Over 60m in the US alone since Roe?
Are you completely new to this subject?
-
1
-
-
28 minutes ago, Substatic said:
I didn't think you were going to provide counter citation to EPI (Ike's central source). This was an easy win. Next!
"Hey research my claim for me. If you don't, I win."
Dude you're getting a derpy as Jerry. You're a Sikh. Act like one. -
10 minutes ago, Substatic said:
Meanwhile there's the other side, (And these are real/recent)
Meanwhile your side treasonously seceded from the Union and declared Chazistan an sovereign nation, continuously attacks state and federal buildings, have rioted and caused millions and millions on damage, and parade around on social media with the hammer and sickle in your profiles -- and ideology that killed exponentially more people than the swastica crowd.
Great argument, Sub.
-
3 minutes ago, Substatic said:
The NBER is a superior source than Biden's NEC director. He flip flops too much, and clearly lacks objectivity.
Nah. Bunch of leftist economist on that board.
4 minutes ago, Substatic said:The NBER officially declares a recession...
You're avoiding the question: By what authority is the NBER the "official" determinate?
I mean you have to avoid the question because there is no federal statute but keep going.
-
25 minutes ago, Substatic said:
I never said there is a global recession, or that we are in one.
Yeah you did.
11 minutes ago, Substatic said:Global recession....blames Biden.
It's not surprising Trump had the lowest educated voter base in history.
Lying's really not a good strategy in this case and it's far below the honor of a noble Sikh.
-
18 minutes ago, Substatic said:
These opinions are great and all, but the NBER disagrees with you
Which is also an opinion.
19 minutes ago, Substatic said:Officially, we aren't in a recession yet.
By which authority is NBER the "official" determinate of whether we're in a recession? Is there a federal statue giving them this authority? Because a lefty Bloomberg writer said so? Inform us.
24 minutes ago, Substatic said:Unless you have a superior source of citation than NBER.
Sure, I'll go with Biden's NEC director from like a week back before he changed his mind on the definition to cover his boss' ass.
-
4 minutes ago, Mr. Impossible said:
Lol yes, Republicans being consistently pro life is pretty dishonest, even for you.
Is this the prog argument that Republicans aren't pro-life because they're evil and greedy and don't care about the poor? Or is something less silly?
-
1 hour ago, Substatic said:
I'm just fact checking the title of this thread and your post, it's objectively false at time of creation going by the NBER.
You're objectively misusing the word "objective." There is no objective definition of a recession. There are only subjective norms.
2 hours ago, Substatic said:Not just Democrats.
Well them too. At least until a few days ago. Biden's director of the NEC:
-
2 hours ago, Substatic said:
1. Provide Counter-Citation directly saying the opposite. You could be right, but considering your past statements and being often incorrect you are not a reliable self-citation.
2. They are left-center, not "leftist", and "HIGH" fact.
Economic Policy Institute - Media Bias/Fact Check (mediabiasfactcheck.com)
1. I didn't make the claim. Do your own research.
2. Citing a leftist fake fact-checking site is a chef's kiss.
-
I can't see Ratboy doing well with black Dems. My early money's on our greaseball Cal gov.
-
1 hour ago, Substatic said:
An objectively poor stance and a "want" given most studies on abortion, and countless medical experts.
Uh-huh. What's the objective scientific consensus on which qualities are necessary or sufficient for something to have a right to life. And please cite authoritative sources if you wanna to play this silly game.
-
21 minutes ago, Ike said:
Post any car or vehicle with a bunch of flags and stickers for her or any dem for that matter. I’ll wait.
Are you for real?
Progs love plastering their cars and yards with bumper stickers and signs. My next door neighbor right now has one of this cringe "In this house we believe..." signs in their yard, and their patio door has a bunch of PBS and NPR stickers on it.
Anywhere, here you go:
-
1 hour ago, Substatic said:
Certainly not PragerU,
The global recession drum beat is getting louder | Reuters
I.M.F. Warns That a Global Recession Could Soon Be at Hand - The New York Times (nytimes.com)
You should tell the IMF about "Eurostat", they might change their outlook with this new data.
Evidently JerryU because you just moved the goal posts from "there's a global recession" to "well one might come..."
Great job.
-
1
-
54% of all inflation is being driven by corporate profits
in Politics
Posted
Yes he did. He said, "The claim in the OP is proven by EPI." But he hasn't read the report. Neither has Ike. They don't know if it's true or not. They're making an argument from authority uses sources I don't remotely trust to be objective, and when I pointed that out, they then want me to read the report and critique it.
It's a bullshit tactic.