dakur

No because you would have a physical advantage. But if that man controls their testosterone levels and muscle mass then I don't see why not compete with other people on that same level including women. The same with women, there are some women who have bodies more similar to men and they have no restrictions against competing with other women. Maybe they should.

They could but if the rules are related to physical characteristics not related to their self-identification then someone could identify as a horse and that wouldn't allow them to compete in a horse race if they don't have a horse stamina. So you wouldn't have to tell them you're not a horse but you are a pretty shitty horse. Seems to me a solomonic solution. Because frankly right now allowing trans people to compete sort of makes the whole gender division in sports pointless. I mean a man could just control their testosterone levels and compete in a women division using the same reasoning. An

Love me some Samurai Shodown.

Sekiro and Ghosts of Tsushima are going to be godly games. Both look very different but both seem amazing.

so? I've seen cases of trans people winning in sport competitions of the gender they identify with. At the beginning I was against this but ultimately I think it is ok because in the end if the physical advantage is the issue then why not segregate other genetically advantaged people like blacks competing in running sports only against each other because they are usually faster? Maybe it'll be better to do divisions like in boxing related to physical characteristics other than race and gender and even allow male-female mixed competitions because I'm sure some women could compete in

Nature + nurture. Science has figured out that most human behaviors are a product of both to different degrees and not one or the other exclusively. Also it helps that the brain is an organ with a lot of plasticity, meaning it gets affected considerably by the environment.

Yeah but then the problem is to look into why women are choosing less paid positions or less work. Does it has something to do with their condition as women, maybe decisions of motherhood or whatever? There's an approach to the problem that could be useful to find solutions but not trying to pass as if women are getting less paid for the same amount of work because that has been debunked continually I think.

Yeah but I think it is a problem of discourse framing because they are dumb. There's no really a gender pay gap per se as in women getting paid less for the same amount of work but females could have it more difficult in the market because of other factors and so they work less hours or they take less well-paid positions, etc. So their discourse is badly framed and it is destroying their credibility.

I usually get an immediate idea/feeling of what I want to say but take a little while to write it. I find these answer fast things hard otherwise. I can't answer with just one word for example specially these questions which are made I think to elaborate a bit.

damn she's fucking good

The Oscars already happened? lol didn't even realized. WTF is Green Book?

1. just an overly complicated simple guy, I love people who want to live and let others live 2. I come from a traumatic confusing process called childbirth and pretty much bumping into walls since then trying to draw up a map of this place. I still like it here quite a bit 3. By making a decision to do it, the end comes without deciding though 4. Worryless, a spectator with a beer on hand 5. Mostly average, depends on the day 6. Everyone, including herself 7. It had pretty nice places to visit and contemplate 8. You get a reference to how noisy silence actual

Good riddance But who tf would want a Xbox service on a PS4? Who tf woud like to play Crackdown 3 instead of GOW or Horizon? This service is going to be an utter failure unless MS keeps it at $1 for hobo lemmings

The liberals should pay attention to someone like George Lakoff, they need to learn how to frame a discourse because they're doing themselves a disservice with half-assed arguments like this.

Wow I thought she was like 25 lol

I think that girl needs a dictionary

If it is 10 years it might be twice as good as Crackdown 3

So MS is probably paying Nintendo to put their service on the Switch, in other words Xbox just became Nintendo's sheep. How do you call the sheep of sheep? Bitches?

Xbox is a Nintendo App now I bet sheep wont even use it

For real... lemmings are the the ones who should least be talking about quality since they've been supporting mediocre crap this whole gen. But on topic, this is another game that performs better on the Pro than on the Xshit LOL

People who lie about shit like this should get the same punishment as the actual perpetrators of a hate crime.

But recently Tetris Effect released exclusively for PSVR? I think it has to do more to the fact that the developer of Tetris 99, Arika, was in financial trouble. They sort of managed to barely stay afloat by releasing Fighting EX Layer last year. So Nintendo sort of picked up on a struggling dev and offered to help publishing the game in exchange of exclusivity. I don't think they will be in trouble anymore, Tetris 99 is a smash hit.

The only destruction worth mentioning related to this game is the one it inflicted on the scarce lemmings faction.

Is this guy still relevant? I thought the hype was dead two months ago.

Laughed too hard at this