dakur

2 minutes ago, Teh_Diplomat said:

Not until I can declare it on my year end taxes

Might be worth giving it a shot

5 hours ago, Cookester15 said:

Good thing I've never read a Harry Potter book or have instagram, otherwise that's me 100%. Even the red laser eyes are spot on.

who?

At this point supporting MS can be considered a form of charity

5 hours ago, DynamiteCop! said:

What?

Xcluded

lol and lemmings got nothing back for the kinect/RROD scam

I was expecting tentacles. Was disappointed. Not Japanese enough!

Has anyone ever tried dancing on ketamine? Because this thread looks like that

GOG wins by default

Looks fun

Didn't it sell like complete shit on the Xbox? If so then maybe it's not worth the investment to enhance a game for so few people.

7 hours ago, jehurey said:

I love that his argument is that the Xbox COMES CLOSE to selling as much as the PS4. That's how pathetic his argument has become.

 

On just one region for just one part of the year lol. Dildo has to restrict the goalpost each time even more. Soon he will say that MS is beating Sony in selling consoles which name starts with X.

He had a good run. Thanks for all the stories 

4 hours ago, jehurey said:

Also, I love how this guy is still reading my posts while pretending that he has me on ignore.

Lol, he does that all the time. I love not how he does that but why. 

2 hours ago, DynamiteCop! said:

The difference being actual story in this game equates to about 10 hours of the 60+ hours of main game, the other 50+ is gameplay and side missions.

 

That's about 15% of the game being "story", the average Sony game is borderlining more in the 50% range if not more.  

 

It's like you don't play Sony games, it's as if you don't have a PlayStation 4 and talk out of your ass like a complete fucking idiot. 

So you rather have 50+ hours of shit gameplay than 20+ hours of quality one? Because GOW was praised for its gameplay and yet lemmings can't shut up about how it is a movie game. Yet they can't shut up with RDR2 as if it were an exclusive. Nevermind, I just remember you spent like 100+ hours on Shit of Thots lol, talk about bottom of the barrel standards.

Funny thing is that lemmings keep saying Sony games are movies because they focus on story rather than gameplay and yet they now regard RDR2 as the second coming just because it renders a couple more pixels on the Xshit.

The fuck is wrong with people? ffs humans suck.

BUILD. THE. WALL.

14 minutes ago, jehurey said:

So now that we know that they use a software emulator, its just a matter if they can access it and be able to dump different ROM files.

All these mini consoles are a rip off IMO. Well maybe for collectors but I would never buy one coming with such a limited amount of games, I rather just use an emulator on the PC.

I don't see a problem with this but Sony should have the decency to improve it further. If they are taking from the open source community they should give something back.

So America trains a sizable part of its population to murder brown people in foreign lands for muh fridom (AKA resources, ideological control, military strategic positions). These individuals go there and become traumatized then they come back to the country and you are surprised when some of them go batshit insane and start murdering people. I think the US has a huge mental health problem, they create these boogeymen to justify their military spending and keeping bases spread all over the world but they are actually their own worst enemy.

Looks Chad more than incel. Is there something like an incel Chad?

This specifically is not an issue so much with the universities but with the business of journal publishing and that is bogus af.

These guys were the same ones who published the conceptual penis paper on one pay-to-publish journal. The thing is everyone in academia knows that pay-to-publish journals are a joke. I have been sent proposals to publish in this type of journals and I always reject it because you basically can publish any nonsense as long as you pay. It is a business, the content of the paper is meaningless for them.

Now with this new batch of fake papers i don't know on which type of journals they were published, if they were serious academic journals or just pay-to-publish nonsense. But it was sort of dishonest of them to make the claims they did with the conceptual penis paper while publishing in a pay-to-publish journal. That doesnt really proof anything so i will take this with a grain of salt.

On the other hand the issues with academic journals are a problem in all sciences, not just gender studies. In the natural sciences some scientists managed to publish a paper created by an AI algorithm, filled with complete nonsense, in one leading natural sciences Journal. Other cases have found fraudulent data in published papers in medical sciences going on for decades. Etc etc. So the problem here is that publishing in academia has become a business and status symbol and not a way to share knowledge as was originally intended.