hoshino

Just now, McWicked said:

When Mexico pays for it.

it's already under construction. No more MS-13 gangmembers for you to blow in an alley 

1 minute ago, McWicked said:

We can afford one, we just don't want one.

And babies don't want to take their medicine either.

Bad news though: you're getting one anyway  

4 minutes ago, zwarior said:

im mad its called Stadia, its a stupid name that doesnt fit in video game lexicon at all

buh buh it's a stadium for everbuddy to play in 

Should've bought the Dreamcast trademark.  Would've been perfect.

58 minutes ago, Team 2019 said:

We need to support the PS5 as it represents traditional console gaming and Switch is a big fuck you to phones and other shit solutions for portable devices

 

+1

If PS5 is a traditional console with the same kind of quality/value demonstrated by PS4, it's a day 1 buy for me

1 hour ago, jehurey said:

People are acting like as if something got taken away from them, and they don't have something today that they had yesterday.

 

I notice alot of people in the "gaming community" start acting like children who had poison ivy in crevice of their ass when the Wii came out in 2006.

 

Nothing was taken from them, but the fact that something else existed, that was not meant for them, people genuinely started losing their shit and demanded that it be removed from this Earth.

 

I literally can't think of a less obtrusive way to offer people games. I could play one Stadia game, in a browser, and never buy another Stadia game again........and it literally cost me nothing in hardware, just the cost of the game (that I would've spent on any other platform).

They're pushing a model which is completely and 100% publisher/distributor centric.  The gamer owns nothing, and worse yet, the gamer has no ability to own anything even if they wanted to.  Games can/will come and go like shows do on Netflix.  You can lose your whole library if banned from the service, and you lose your whole library if your internet goes down.  How does the subscription model work here too? Do I lose my library if I unsub?  Am I paying for both the games and the service?

The only win for the gamer here is that there is no barrier to entry.  Like you said, this is not a big deal.  It doesn't hurt anyone to be able to try/access a game with minimal effort, but this is Google we're talking about.  They aren't interested in being a companion service or an alternative.  They want to run the gaming industry.  Their motto is "The future of gaming isn't a box."

I don't want the future of gaming to be a shitty latency-dependent system where I own nothing and can have all my games taken away from me for reasons outside of my control.  I don't want developers to worry about making their games playable on 6" phone screens and tailoring the experience to that.  I also really don't want developers tailoring their games around the latency issues.  Quick twitch games are unplayable on this service.  Reaction time dependent genres are going to evaporate for this reason alone.  I don't want to have to live in a city with fiber internet to make any of this more enjoyable.

Idk if you're a car guy, but would you want the future of automobiles to be self-driving ubers and for you to lose your ability to drive and own your own car?

21 minutes ago, lostfool said:

You are literally stupid

You’re such a grumpy miserable liberal cunt  

get your T checked 

If you support this shit you’re an anti gamer cuck. 

26 minutes ago, Cookester15 said:

Fuck the cloud. Fuck it all to hell. Fuck streaming, fuck latency, fuck google, fuck Microsoft. Stop trying to ruin gaming. 

If buying a physical copy of a game on Xbox allowed me to then stream it to any device as an added benefit, then I’m completely on board. 

I will NEVER buy a console that doesn’t let me own my games and play them locally. Streaming will always always always be a cherry on top. It’s never going to attract me when it’s the whole sundae. 

57 minutes ago, McWicked said:

Arguing against a national fiber network to own the libs.  

We can’t afford a wall to keep Olympic swimming pools full of fentanyl out of our country but we can afford national fiber so I can download my little pony faster :soysmile:

3 minutes ago, McWicked said:

It's definitely the future, but the US has an infrastructure problem that will delay that future indefinitely until the people sucking telecom dick (GOP) get voted out of congress, the senate, and the white house.



hahahahah youre so buttblasted you fucking cuck  

I'm not touching Stevia with a 10 foot pole. If Xbox can offer me dedicated hardware + streaming for when I'm away, I'll take that.

1 hour ago, Team 2019 said:

 

This dude owns  

Jesus that's like a full 1000ms

37 minutes ago, lynux3 said:

Super impressive!

Imagine if Mike Morhaime had waddled across the stage instead of Jade Raymond  

23 minutes ago, JONBpc said:

Why are you always so mad 

liberal

Was hoping against all odds for real hardware.  Was looking for google to shake up the console wars.  Instead we got a shitty controller and first party games from jade Raymond.

28 minutes ago, bhytre said:

Stevia yuppies will beg even harder than hermits for Japanese games

Streaming commie box

This shit has flop written all over it

Just now, lynux3 said:

I missed the first thirty minutes. So no exclusives or demonstrations? 

demo yes

exclusives no

Well, that was a flop

Hard pass from me

JADE RAYMOND IS HEADING THEIR FIRST PARTY DEV

9 minutes ago, Pureis said:

looks like shit

streaming console

support from big publishers

99 dollars

built in "Ok Google" microphone to monitor for hatespeech

SJW values built right in (no toxic males allowed)

automatic censorship of political views anywhere to the right of lenin

automatic gender reassignment surgery on first bootup

console exclusive featuring world first genderqueer protagonist

console avatars to feature neon green and pink as only hair color choices