Jump to content

Tears of the Cows

Sheep
  • Content Count

    60,696
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    64

Everything posted by Tears of the Cows

  1. Im saying they COULD, and you said they can’t because of R&D. R&D costs don’t stop other companies from releasing hardware yearly, do they? and I chose ford because ford & Sony are worth similar.
  2. It’s not a stupid idea unless you like using outdated tech, lol.
  3. It still would be. I’d imagine they’d go back ~5 years of support.
  4. Very specific games in very specific conditions, factory sealed. imagine waiting 30 years to get a ROI of $100 btw, rule of rose on ps2 is $25 on eBay. https://www.ebay.com/itm/305152503201?mkcid=16&mkevt=1&mkrid=711-127632-2357-0&ssspo=gqgx2_cxrma&sssrc=4429486&ssuid=&var=&widget_ver=artemis&media=COPY
  5. it makes physical copies worth absolutely nothing more than the cost of the digital game. percieved value =/= real value. In 30 years these games will be worth a big fat $0.
  6. It would be the exact same thing as if they released a phone every three years. lol. Instead of the iPhone 13, 14 you’d go from the iPhone 12>15. That would suck. The 13 and 14 pushed things further than the 12, why would I want to use the 12 for 3 years? same reason I’d rather not use a ps5/series x/switch when they’re all weak at this point.
  7. Not really, it’s how innovation and progression happens. Just because they aren’t releasing a console yearly doesn’t mean they aren’t actively building the next one at almost all times. I don’t even think this would result in more units being made.
  8. Meaning they would be released yearly… and old hardware is phased out, or software can be exclusive for the “latest” hardware. Think about it, most of tech has already went this way. Smartphones and watches, Computers, tvs, cars, etc. Similar to phones, you will simply trade in your existing console for a decent return that you can then put toward the new one. i like this idea personally, but there are some downsides. While tech is always evolving, this would eliminate “gens” but devs would still be held back by the weakest supported hardware. I know some will se
  9. just kidding. its prelim approved, like I said it would be… all along. https://www.theverge.com/2023/9/22/23885176/microsofts-activision-blizzard-uk-cma-preliminary-approval
  10. how the hell did this happen? Did it make it to Pittsburgh? did fed ex update it as lost or did they just keep pushing out the delivery date? hopefully the second one gets delivered and you get two
  11. Just got tracking today and it’s on schedule to be here tomorrow.
  12. Halo infinite had 20 million. At least 50% were F2P, obviously. I don’t even know what you’re trying to argue… MS made even MORE money and that over 50% of people paid $70 for it???
  13. No, I said halo multiplayer was f2p. Which is why it hit 20 million
  14. Who said it wouldn’t????? You’re not even making a point
  15. So 10 million players, average of 200k on steam… and you think “most players are on steam”
×
×
  • Create New...