Jump to content

Long Ball Larry

Sheep
  • Content Count

    62,208
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    68

Everything posted by Long Ball Larry

  1. Yes he was from Illinois he was just charged with fleeing state lines when he went back home. and again, the intent was bringing an illegal fire arm to a protest if he was 18 and there was clear evidence it was self defense (why was that guy chasing him) I’d say it’s open and closed self defense but that isn’t the case here
  2. See this is where I’m hung up. I don’t know if one would cancel the other out or not. It really all depends on how this started I guess.
  3. Big Pharma is the real reason it won’t happen tho, not the cartel
  4. You don’t have to convince me bro I’m totally for it lol. It’s the only way that makes sense
  5. He had a gun illegally he Was from out of state, presumably trespassing on the property to begin with those are the only two things I can think of
  6. it’s bizarre and most people will raise and eye brow and legalizing heroin but really what other option is there.
  7. Well I think he does. If I murder someone and you see it, you are not allowed to murder me.. I could defend (and end up killing you) and be fine. But I’d still be charged with murder for the first killing.
  8. It isn’t. It’s totally fine. But not with a gun if it’s illegal for you to possess.
  9. I don’t know either way, I’m saying I’ll leave it up to the jury. He had intent as he came, but he (may) have self defended. Does one cancel the other out? im saying I don’t know, just trying to say how i see it.
  10. He intentionally brought a gun with the motive to “protect” while not legally being able to carry a gun. This is different than little tommy shooting Bobby the burglar with his dads shot gun while there may have been set defense there was also intent there by even being there with a gun “to protect”
  11. I have a few things w self defense. He could possibly get it and just have a simple illegal firearm charge. But at the same time, he should have never been there with a gun. From the pre shooting interview we knew his intent was to protect businesses (fine) with a gun (fine) but he can’t have a gun to begin with
  12. It’s true, though. Self defense or not it was illegal for him to have a fire arm really
  13. This has been my stance since I can remember. Tax it, validate its authenticity, and regulate it. it was always easier to get pot vs beer in high school, and the same goes for really any illegal drug, so I mean that alone speaks volumes any crime committed on said drug is a full violation still and there is no “bu bu I was” excuse
  14. Yeah for once I agree with Jerry, this dude should have NEVER been there and if so, definitely not with a gun. Where tf are the parents with this one, Jesus.
  15. That little white girl turned man (assuming here) is the one saying “shoot me, n*gga” over and over. She then got shot in the face
  16. USA Today lol too? https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/08/25/jacob-blake-kenosha-police-shot-black-man-minutes-after-arriving/3438802001/
  17. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jacob-blake-kenosha-shooting-wisconsin-police-black-man-protesters-gather/ “CBS lol.” Too?
  18. I mean he’s reporting the 911 call. He’s not the only one to report it... just someone who made it readable in under 160 characters
  19. New info trickling in: so uh, yeah this is probably the reason they didn’t just “let him drive away” as some have said they should have ITT
  20. Notice how the SW antifa won’t answer your questions but simply answer them with other questions about something else? Funny isn’t it? Lol
×
×
  • Create New...