Tears of the Cows

@Cookester15 anyone on SW believe in more than two genders? Didn’t see anyone agree with it ITT. I’d love to have a discussion with them, tho

Just now, jehurey said:

You responded to make a specific argument about climate change.

 

 

 

Last chance..........are you going to answer it?

Or run away?

What arguement? You didn’t make one claim in your entire post.  Anyway, as I said, I’ll no longer be responding to spam posts ITT. Scroll up and see if you want to be part of the debate, otherwise, It’ll be pretty quiet ITT for you. 

Guess we don’t need to respond to Jerry’s spam posts. 

Anyone wanna debate there being more than two genders? Because there’s not.

1 minute ago, jehurey said:

And you just tried changing the subject from the argument you started with me.

 

Too bad, you're not getting out of it. If you want to change subjects...........go plead to @Cookester15

So you can’t discuss the subject in the thread?

Just now, jehurey said:

well, it would explain you trying to mimic me every 5th post.

Kinda like how you change the subject every 5 posts. 

Still waiting for your your stance on genders, in a thread about stances on genders. 

5 hours ago, jehurey said:

LOL the butthurt is spilling in other threads.

Notice how you can’t deny it lmaoooo

4 hours ago, jehurey said:

you're right. I should've known better than to assume he was a man based on his posts.

I identify as a jerry

41 minutes ago, jehurey said:

you're right we should stick to what we were talking about

 

so what were we talking about again, oh yes ghosts responded to my post and started it off:

 

 

 

 

Proceed ahead

Whole bunch of nothing ITP.  Just like people who think there are more than two genders.

27 minutes ago, jehurey said:

So you are saying that a person is banned if they don't answer a question?

 

Because if so.........

@Cookester15 here we have jerry again attempting to derail. We heard his take on climate control, but as you can see, he isn’t willing to discuss the thread subject in here. Time for a vacation where he can go roast in that global warming 

8 minutes ago, jehurey said:

[Looks at your response to my post and what that topic was about.]

 

You lost. And you tried to run away from your own claim.

 

That’s nice. Now what’s your opinion on genders since we know you’re pro cc?

@Cookester15 let’s see if he answers

12 minutes ago, jehurey said:

You lose.

 

Thanks for playing.

 

And tries to run off to another subject...............if that isn't 100% Ghosts, then i don't know what is?

 

C-o-m-p-l-e-t-e

*looks at thread title*

@Cookester15 maybe we should get jerry outta here since he can’t stick to topics? 

Actually, no, I’d rather hear your take on genders @jehurey

22 minutes ago, jehurey said:

To start off...............you just tried running away from your own post. But I'll get to that later.

 

Yeah, increased population will increase warming and cause erratic changes in climate, which will affect our ability to grow food if we don't have predictable geographical climate data in order to plan on. Food supply is affected, leading to famine and a fight for resources.

 

That qualifies as a NEGATIVE outcome.

 

There you go.

 

You know that this is the outcome, your main complaint is that we can't nail down the specific of when, and by how much.......therefore you try to call it a wash in order to debunk it.

 

So now let's go back to the question I asked you FIRST.......answer it.  Avoid answering it, and you automatically lose.

Means I lose? I’m not playing a game you fool.  you’re all speculation, if not, post your scientific PROOF bc I’ll easily be able to debunk it

20 minutes ago, kokujin said:

Ghosts is gonna petal somewhere.

 

 

 

Petal. 

Imma flower ur ass into 200 degree farienheint winters

16 minutes ago, jehurey said:

But you just completely undermined your own viewpoint.

 

If we know that the Earth's population is only going in one direction, and we know what the Earth can and cannot sustain.........please provide me the scenario where NOTHING BAD happens?

 

You're trying to play stupid. All you are saying is that the AMOUNT of harm to the environment cannot be exactly know, and is "therefore only speculation"

 

You didn't disprove the scenario of harm to the environment, did you?

 

There's no point in trying to sound smart when you are still attempting to say nothing.

That last sentence of yours describes your post. 

And Jerry, since you know, what is going to happen? I’d LOVE to know. 

10 minutes ago, Jon2B said:

Alt left sides with the alt left regardless of the matter . They are the biggest hypocrites and are just generally dumb and weak . And hateful and angry .

Same with the right alt. The right alt and the left alt are basically the same people with opposite ideas. Not much else, they’d probably all be friends if they didn’t know their political stance. 

42 minutes ago, jehurey said:

LOL, there is no "centralist" position on science-based issues.

 

You're basically saying "I understand the conclusions........but I'm purposely hedging my bets."

 

You either believe the science or you don't.  It seems like the only people who ASSIGNED liberals as being "left" on the climate change issue or people who just don't want to acknowledge the scientific consensus.

 

I need to find the article. People who go around calling themselves "centrists"............are weak people who exhibit no real leadership qualities.

 

They order the SAFE food on the restaurant menu.........and pretend that they know food better than everybody else. If you come across an issue and  primarily mentality is "I'm purposely going to find the center point", you are doing it wrong.

Scientifically we are entering a known phase of the earth. Scientifically we have never been in this type of phase of the earth with the population we currently have. 

^both facts, anything else is speculation 

I’m a centralist on climate change as wel. Go figure. There are idiots on both sides. 

The world is going through a scheduled warming phase however there have never been as many humans on the planet while this occurred. So I think it’s great (but perhaps not even needed) to take caution on it, but even if it wasn’t just a phase, we aren’t going to see our lifetimes affected.  Me personally? I say bring it out. I’d prefer Pittsburgh to have 40-60 degree winters. 

Selfish attitudes FTW as I petal to the metal

On 2019-01-14 at 3:22 PM, Cookester15 said:

Science isn't meant to be used for sides, it's supposed to be indisputable facts. How can you on one side believe climatologists that the earth is heating up and then go and deny biologists that there are differences between sexes and genders? And vice versa.  

 

I'm starting to think the real "woke" is being a centrist. 

The real woke was always a centralist. It’s the only side to be on. Imagine being Democrat and Satan runs for office as a Democrat? Most of them would blindly vote for him even if his campaign speech was centered around killing all first borns. 

Not just democrats, but republicans as well. 

And, well, he sold more than any artist in the world in 2018. How does this dude sell so much...STILL?

https://www.vibe.com/2019/01/eminem-sold-more-albums-2018

1 hour ago, kokujin said:

is it on netflix?could buy smokes and watch it.

Nah but You can make a new email / new Hulu account and sign up for their trial live tv service to watch it. 

37 minutes ago, SheepKilla said:

I'm not watching a 6-hour anything on R Kelly

Def worth a watch 

VR will never catch on, give up. 

18 minutes ago, roflpwnedz said:

Fuck, I watched the first one. Now I gotta see the rest

Yeah man it’s wild. Keep watching 

1 minute ago, Remij_ said:

Is that all it takes?  

 

 

VR isn't going anywhere.  It's the future of entertainment.  So you ARE wrong... WERE wrong... and WILL CONTINUE to be wrong  

 Not as big goofy wearable goggles