lynux3

I feel like double branding would be the most cost efficient method, and as you reminded me weeks ago that Microsoft was selling Xbox 360 / Xbox One branded cases when Xbox One launched. It'll be the same game anyways just the Scarlett version will be patched with the extra bits. Microsoft seems to have established the fact that backwards compatibility is a thing with their consoles quite well so I don't think there will be any confusion.

The 120fps is a pipedream and a waste, but I think we can expect One X to be 4K@60fps and Scarlett to be 4K@60fps with extra goodies like ray tracing. Microsoft will probably double brand the game as Xbox One / Scarlett since they already confirmed it's going to launch with the console.

https://www.amazon.com/Doom-Nintendo-Switch/dp/B075MZMFXH/ref=sr_1_2?keywords=Doom%2BSwitch&qid=1560311077&s=gateway&sr=8-2&th=1

FLP

$ 1260

$60 for the same game or $1260 with ray tracing and the same game.

Doom is still $60... this is definitely going to be $60.

Let me throw away $1200 to enjoy this game with ray tracing at 1080p/60fps and get the same experience I would on console.

It was stupid to not even consider this.

Lockhart might be alive after all.

Oh shit, I didn't even notice.

There it is. It would be in their best interest to meet that target now that its been said.

You have dipshits like @lostfool ready and willing to pay $59.99 for trash.

Link?

A game that came out over three years ago now.

Yeah, I meant to put Wii U in there as well.

Meant to put Wii U in there as well.

What about the Switch missing out on 90% of 3rd party multiplatform games this entire gen (6 years)?

https://www.amazon.com/Placeholder-35-Nintendo-Switch-Standard/dp/B07SH3D6HT/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=the+witcher+3+switch&qid=1560290000&s=gateway&sr=8-1

Xbox One all over again.

It looks like a current gen game.