lynux3

Yes, dominant. Doesn't matter what it is, Sony has Microsoft so bent over right now they're practically begging to put your beloved Xbox Game Pass on PlayStation. Sony has all the bases covered and Microsoft hasn't even got off the ground yet. Sony has exclusives, the user base, game streaming, game download service ala Game Pass, biggest and best network/services, first party studios/collabs, and the best 3rd party deals.

Microsoft dropping the ball and really fucking up this generation has really demoralized all lemmings. I'm not surprised you feel this way, and the reality is if Microsoft was in Sony's dominant position you'd be singing a different tune.

You already tucked tail and ran to PosC so none of this really concerns you anyways.

TLHBR

There's no difference, I swearz!!1

Only thing that smells like bullshit to me is the 1TB NVMe. Everything else seems achievable.

Yawn.

Shut the fuck up. It's quite obvious there's a difference. No one is arguing whether or not the difference is more or less noticeable in motion or on a big ass UHD TV. DLSS looks blurrier and obscures some of the details in the native 4K image. The only way to properly do comparisons is by zooming in or comparing the image at native resolution on a monitor that can support it. This is exactly what Digital Foundry does, it's no different. If Digital Foundry came out with a video tomorrow detailing the differences between DLSS and whatever that native 4K image is using or not using and confirmed

Exactly. The performance gains do not justify the pricing. This card should be $799.99 at the most (reference) and then maybe $899.99 for AIB shit.

I've said from the very beginning that the RTX 20XX series GPUs were going to be one of NVIDIA's worst GPUs in a long time, and so far I've been right.

So what? It's not about being able to afford a video card, it's about whether or not it's worthy of it's ROI. It's not. RTX flopped. I could buy 10 of these cards and it wouldn't hurt me at all, but I'm most certainly not stupid enough to actually do it. lol

It doesn't matter. PussC gamers are always all about the best graphical fidelity, framerates and technology. Hermslobs are the first ones to point out minuscule differences in zoomed in screenshots before anyone else and this goes against everything Remij has been about for the last year. Despite DLSS looking worse, and it does look worse, it's okay because NVIDIA developed it.

Perturbed.

End of an era.

Nvidiot tricked again. RTX flopped.

Destroyed.

Why is NSMBU exclusive?

$2K for a phone.

Media Molecule's track record looks pretty good to me. Dreams is basically a highly advanced, consumer facing software development kit... I'd be interested to see if actual developers utilize it for their own games and if some creations get monetized in some form or fashion. A lot of people are extremely impressed with this effort.

We've heard from a handful of indie developers that there games perform at, inline or above expectations.

This pretty much confirms (at least in France) what we all suspected, that no one buys a Switch to play 3rd party games. Not a good look for future 3rd party support.

Is anyone really surprised Switch graphic intensive games look like shit? Just wait until next generation systems come along. I don't think developers are going to be trying to port shit to Switch at that point... which is why I believe Switch (as it is now) will never even get close to PlayStation 4 sales.

That's because it doesn't have "Xbox" written on it, literally.

Amazing handheld. The funny thing is that all of the trash that was going to Vita is literally filling up the eShop. Nintendo fucked themselves on that one.

Interesting. Time to put him back on posting/thread creation limits.