Jump to content

Display Name

System Warrior
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    6,665

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Display Name

    Will Wii EVER get a AAA game?!

    in Hall of Shame / Fame

    Posted

    lol, so the Sheep actually think Warioware is better than Zelda.

    The Warioware review is on par with THPS3.

    So you admit Gamespot is a joke and that Zelda is the highest rated game of next gen? Stop flip flopping, Kerry, and make your choice. :D

    I've always said the Zelda review was ownage because it made you and all you butt buddies cry for weeks. :D

    But didn't I already state that TP was my GOTY?

    Will Wii EVER get a AAA game?!

    in Hall of Shame / Fame

    Posted

    Mini-game compilations don't count.

    And lol SSJ has to bump old threads to make him feel better about himself.

    Zelda is rated higher overall than Gears, yet because of its GS score is doesnt live up to par. Yet Warioware gets a AAA score from GS and it doesnt count because you dont like it? :D

    Care to embarrass yourself with contradictions some more? :D

    Isn't that a contradiction too?

    If you want to say Zelda > Gears, you have to consider this POS game to be a sub AA title.

    Good thing mini-game compilations are shallow distractions, no harm in ignoring them.

    How is it a contradiction? Gamerankings is a reality, not a preference. But if you choose to stick your fingers in your ears and close your eyes, Warioware is AAA and above every PS3 game.

    But then you'd have to take into account standards.

    Wii isn't even comparable in that department anyways, everyone expects so much less from that POS.

    And when are you going to actually play either of these games SSJ?

    I played and beat Zelda and its my GOTY.

    Will Wii EVER get a AAA game?!

    in Hall of Shame / Fame

    Posted

    Mini-game compilations don't count.

    And lol SSJ has to bump old threads to make him feel better about himself.

    Zelda is rated higher overall than Gears, yet because of its GS score is doesnt live up to par. Yet Warioware gets a AAA score from GS and it doesnt count because you dont like it? :D

    Care to embarrass yourself with contradictions some more? :D

    Isn't that a contradiction too?

    If you want to say Zelda > Gears, you have to consider this POS game to be a sub AA title.

    Good thing mini-game compilations are shallow distractions, no harm in ignoring them.

    Why do people consider DOA to be a shallow fighter?

    in Hall of Shame / Fame

    Posted

    That was boring as hell.

    Alright slappy, if you wan't to play the retarded fankid fine by me.

    I'm serious. I like Tekken. I just happen to like the newer DOAs (DOAU, DOA4) more. But that was one of the most boring matches of Tekken I have ever seen. It was the same punch with a few rising kicks here and there.

    lol I'm not asking you to critique the entertainment value of the fight, that's DOA's redeeming value the fights look cinematic.

    Too bad they aren't nearly as cerebral as that video.

    I can tell when people don't play DOA with comments like that, or at least playing with anyone decent.

    Each character in DOA4 has 60-100 moves. You could play DOA for months like I did and still see some amazing new moves that will make you say wow. Add on top of that the much better countering system in which you have to predict at what level they're going to hit you (high, mid, low, punch or kick) and how little time they actually give you to do them. Then if you factor in tag battles, that throws a whole other mess of strategies you have to learn, especially when there's a big difference of when you're tagging alone or with another person.

    lol being suprised by moves, why are you suprised by them?

    You wouldn't happen to be button mashing hmm?

    I know you think DOA is strategic and all that, but still the game's learning curve is practically zilch.

    DOA3 was the first 3D fighter I really got into last gen, I never once found its combat particularly challenging, its so fast and chaotic and simple you can just flail your fingers around and defeat veterans that had been playing it since it launched. There's nothing wrong with that, because games like SC have the same problem and yet they are still enjoyable. But in terms of quality and pure depth, it doesn't do much for me./

    Why do people consider DOA to be a shallow fighter?

    in Hall of Shame / Fame

    Posted

    That was boring as hell.

    Alright slappy, if you wan't to play the retarded fankid fine by me.

    I'm serious. I like Tekken. I just happen to like the newer DOAs (DOAU, DOA4) more. But that was one of the most boring matches of Tekken I have ever seen. It was the same punch with a few rising kicks here and there.

    lol I'm not asking you to critique the entertainment value of the fight, that's DOA's redeeming value the fights look cinematic.

    Too bad they aren't nearly as cerebral as that video.

    Why do people consider DOA to be a shallow fighter?

    in Hall of Shame / Fame

    Posted

    lol are you DOA fankids just defending it because its the Xbox fighter?

    I figured most fighter enthusiasts would agree on Tekken.

    No, I'm just saying these idiots think Tekken isn't a button masher... :shakes:

    Oh and DOA isn't? :|

    I already stated they and every other fighter out there is a button masher. :|

    There are definitely varying degrees.

    You may think Tekken is mashy, but no way is it worse than DOA.

×
×
  • Create New...