Jump to content

Goukosan

Sheep
  • Content Count

    35,419
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    45

Posts posted by Goukosan

  1. 1 hour ago, Remij said:

     

    To be fair, I expected Microsoft to actually release some big games in the 3 years the console has been on the market growing GamePass...

     

    They've failed horribly and I've admitted that.. and GamePass has stagnated as a result.  I blame it on Microsoft's ineptitude.. not necessarily the model itself.

     

    It's the model too.    We have never had a point in gaming where two console manufactures are selling 100 of millions of hardware + over a billion in software EACH.. Within the same gen.   Both Switch and PS4 pulled that off while being on the market at the same time. 

     

    Point im making is traditional game sales (including digital because it's an actual purchase) are bigger than they have ever been in the history of gaming. 

     

    Gaming as a whole is no where close to be ready for a gamepass model. 

     

    Look at the hundreds upon hundreds of millions MS is spending to barely keep GP afloat. 

     

    That's not a sustainable model for decades to come. 

    • Like 1
  2. This is the cost (or what MS expects the publisher would ask for) of getting games day one on Game Pass:


    Star Wars Jedi Survivor - $300M
    Suicide Squad - $250M
    Assassin's Creed Rift - $100M
    Gotham Knights - $30M
    Dying Light 2 - $50M
    LEGO Star Wars - $35M
    Baldur's Gate 3 - $5M (after Larian's huge success, I don't think it will be only $5M anymore)

    GTA V - $12-$15M per month 
    Red Dead 2 - $5M per month. 

     


    Mortal Kombat 1 - $250M

    Dragon Ball: The Breakers - $20M
    Return to Moneky Island - $5M
    Wreckfest 2 - $10-$14M
    Just Dance - $5M
    Blood Runner - $5M
    Glitch Busters - $5M

     

     

     

    MS literally spending hundreds of millions of dollars to beg publishers for games :kaz:

     

     

     

    LemiJ - "Nintendo and Sony copying gamepass anyday now" :grimaceleft:

    • Geese 1
  3. Just now, Mr. House said:

    I'm ok with it being banned under the assumption that it peddles inappropriate or political content.

     

    Who cares about Christianbooks.com do or don't do? 

     

    Such as? You need to elaborate. 

     

     

    What inappropriate political content would a dr. Suess book, a layman medical encyclopedia that's been around for decades and dictionaries have in them? :umad:

     

     

    "Months after Florida canceled a class on African American history, the state has now endorsed the use of a controversial collection of videos by an unaccredited, right-wing group — some of which show animated versions of Christopher Columbus and Frederick Douglass defending slavery to students."

     

     

    So they Banned the actual history class and history books, to implement unaccredited right wing content to the children. 


     

     

    Oh and don't take my word for it... Take the founders word. 

     

    PragerU founder admits conservative material is ‘indoctrination’ — it’s now allowed in FL schools

     

    Founder, Dennis Prager: “We bring doctrines to children. That is a very fair statement. But what is the bad of our indoctrination?’”

     

     

     

    PragerU features content it says it has developed for “6th Grade & Up,” which includes “Left Vs. Right: Host CJ Pearson shines a light on the differences between conservative and left-wing thinking from the role of government to doing good versus feeling good.”

     

     

    What were you saying about pushing political content onto kids?  :umad:

     

  4. 25 minutes ago, Mr. House said:

    No, but I wouldn't be surprised if some book on medicines and Navy SEALS did have graphics content. 

     

    Yes, because that's a a direct attempt to alter the original artist vision to appease modern snowflakes.

     

    Being banned from school libraries is not the end of the book. It's soft attempt at censorship is however a direct attempt at changing the original content and ideas. 

     

    You have yet to answer my question, what does the conservatives gain at banning books? 

     

    I mean, we know why liberals wants to edit books for modern audiences and leave books for children in elementary schools to read with inappropriate content. It's best to sexualize and indoctrinate them as soon as possible while they don't know better.

     

    They're literally coming for children with political/inappropriate content and any attempt at trying to regulate such content being exposed to is supposed to be bad? Ok. 

     

    Ahhh so there are no unsavory graphic stuff in Dr. SEUSS.. Yet you're ok with it being banned.. Not only at schools but at Libraries. 

     

    The other books are available on Cristian books.com for families and kids..... Yet the far right thinks it's not suitable for kids.... Despite those same books being suitable for over a decade plus. 

     

    You answered your own question... Indoctrination.  They're removing history books and replacing it with Prager U content which is a literal wing propaganda outlet who publishes non accredited "educational videos" which

    change historical events to match their crazy theories. 

     

    You're ok with all of this..... But lost your shit because a synonym was used as to not encourage kids violence. 

  5. 1 minute ago, Mr. House said:

    You must missed where I said 'probably'. 

     

    There must be a good reason as to what transpired in those books to be banned. The main reason as we know is to protect children from content that they shouldn't be exposed to. Maybe those books had very graphics stuff in them. 

     

    Tell me otherwise what's the conservatives gameplan? Banning books for the sake of it which make for easy attack from democrats?  What is there to even gain? 

     

    Dr. SEUSS books have very Graphic stuff in them? Lol

     

    So let me get this straight you lost your shit because two words were changed in favor of two synonyms that meant the same thing but in a less violent way.. This happened in one Dr. SEUSS book.... Bbbbut teh Far left censorship :lupe:

     

     

    But old ass Dr. SEUSS books being outright banned is A OK and must have been done for a good reason or something.

     

    Lmfao. 

  6. 21 minutes ago, Mr. House said:

    Never heard of new editions of the same book? I know for a fact they rewrote Dr Seuss for modern audiences, I made a thread about it a while back. 

     

    It's perfectly acceptable to ban books from schools that does not follow the guidelines and regulations. Most of which are about sexual woke indoctrination aimed at young children. You really want to defend that? Go ahead, knock yourself out. 


     

    You must have missed where I said published over a decade ago including old Dr. Suess books :umad:

     

    They changed two words in one Dr Suess book and you lost your shit.. I remember your fake outrage. 

     

    Yes somehow you're ok with actually banning the orginal books.. Strange. 

     

    The list also includes “The Gale Encyclopedia Of Medicine,” a five-volume set containing medical information for the layperson, and “Eyes on Target: Inside Stories From the Brotherhood of the U.S. Navy SEALs,” which is available on ChristianBook.com.

     

    Ramza you Fucking tool :kaz:

     

  7. 11 minutes ago, Mr. House said:

    Most likely in the new versions edited by wokists, yes. Dr Seuss probably identify as non binary and like to take the D up his butthole. A great read for you and your family. 

     

    Nah these were books published over a decade ago. 

     

    Remember how fake outraged you were when one word changed in a recent Dr Seuss book. 

     

    Look at you now bending over backwards saying it's acceptable to ban his earlier books, dictionaries and text books 📚

     

    You're a fucking Hypocrite through and through.  Not surprised. 

  8. 55 minutes ago, Remij said:

    No I get it.  I just thought the argument wasn't ever about being designed from the ground up, but rather how well ports could be optimized for Steam Deck vs Switch 1/2 as handheld devices.  This game obviously wasn't designed around the specs of the Switch and then ported up.. but it was still custom built and ported for the Switch on development kits.. which means there's optimization that is indeed happening here to get it to work at all.  They made specific decisions when porting this game to get it to work on Switch and these are the results we're seeing.

     

     

     

    That would be a silly argument to have because of the huge power gap between Switch and deck. 

     

    From the start I've been talking about  games made specifically for it aka from the ground up. 

     

    That is what has kept the Switch alive for 7 years.  1st and 3rd party developers making games specifically for Switch.  So even now that the hardware is even more ancient, the system STILL has new games still being made for it.. From the ground up. 

     

    The deck is already starting to struggle running current gen games that have no cross gen version.... It will only get worse for it.... But it doesn't have the luxury of falling back on games that were made specifically for it from the ground up. 

     

    So unlike the Switch you will not be getting 7 years of new games, unless it's indies. 

     

    What you will get though is portable access to you old steam library. 

     

     

     

     

  9. 1 hour ago, Playstation Tablet said:

    I remember so many kids owning MK on Gameboy back in the day. This port is fine compared to this.

     

     

     

     

    Yea this is waaaay worse BUT the Switch version of this new MK1 is terrible and frankly shouldn't have been ported. 

     

    We're at the point now where games are being designed for PS5/Series X with no cross gen version on PS4.... Switch 1 can't keep up to put out a decent version of PS5 games. 

     

  10. Just now, Remij said:

    The point was about being able to targeting specific hardware and better utilize it.. that happened here with this port and it still turned out horribly.

     

    Not even compared to PS5... it's just ugly in general.

     

    It's very ugly in general on Switch because the game was designed around PS5 level hardware that was then ported down, waaaay down to Switch 1.

     

    Targeting specific Switch hardware would mean the game was designed with switch in mind and then ported up to PS5.   

     

    Like how MH Rise was designed around Switch... Specifically Switch hardware. (even though PC was planned from the jump as well)

     

    So from textures, gameplay, geometry, memory usage etc.. All designed specially around Switch hardware. 

  11. 56 minutes ago, TLHBO said:

    No shit sherlock.

     

    The port was made specifically for Switch, but that doesn't make it a good buy.

     

    Its still a port of a game designed for PS5/Series X. 

     

    A game made specifically for Switch means designed from the ground up for Switch genius. 

     

    When people say deck won't have games made specifically for it that's what they mean. 

     

    Yea its not a good buy, this is a PS5 level game. Switch can't keep up with that. 

×
×
  • Create New...