Jump to content

Goukosan

Sheep
  • Content Count

    35,189
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    45

Everything posted by Goukosan

  1. and what was the general consensus from all the experts in that same article? "But generally we heard from experts that although Clinton wants to make it easier for many undocumented immigrants to obtain legal status, that’s not the same as getting rid of enforcement entirely and allowing open borders." Our ruling Trump said that Clinton "wants to have open borders."  "We rate this statement Mostly False."
  2. In a speech about trade, energy and Business.. she talks about trading with other countries and open boarders. Dense Mother Fuckers "OMG, she is obviously talking about Immigration... those illegal immigrants are used to trade energy and goods between businesses"
  3. Our ruling Trump said that Clinton "wants to have open borders." We rate this statement Mostly False. https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/oct/19/donald-trump/donald-trump-says-hillary-clinton-wants-have-open-/
  4. That speech was about trade, energy and Business...it was a speech to a bank..had nothing to do with immigration. In a brief speech excerpt from 2013, she called for "a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders, some time in the future with energy that is as green and sustainable." See how dumb you are
  5. Did Fox News or Donald Trump tell you that? Its hilarious how gullible the general populace is
  6. He is talking about diversifying their business and leveraging their IPs to expand as an entertain company. Which was the long term strategy that Iwata had put in place. Theme Parks, Movies etc. In the long-term, perhaps our focus as a business could shift away from home consoles - flexibility is just as important as ingenuity." Asked about how Nintendo intends to adapt to "fluctuations" in the industry, Furukawa added he was "thinking about little ways we can reduce that kind of instability" and said he'd "like to increase" Nintendo's smartphone game de
  7. Last time going over this with you. CPU "The two CPU chips run at the same GHz speed, but the PS3's seven individual cores beat out the Xbox's three dual-threaded cores. And in terms of performance measured in gigaflops, the PS3 tops out at nearly three times that of the Xbox." RAM "the Xbox's total amount of RAM is slightly misleading, as the system RAM and video RAM are shared. The PS3's XDR RAM is also far more fast and efficient than the Xbox's GDDR3 RAM, running at a speed of 3.2 GHz compared to 700 MHz."
  8. last gen games were CPU intensive and games were designed and developed to be very CPU centric. So yes a more powerful CPU did matter last gen... anyways... like I said earlier. The topic was about this gen. Not going back and forth with your delusional ass about PS3 not being more powerful than 360 MS got out engineered out of the gate this gen. Point blank...point of this thread.
  9. It had some strengths against the PS3.... 360 was also easier to develop for. But... games built from the ground up on PS3 were ahead of anything on 360. PS3 was more powerful but a pain to develop for. MS gets a win for 360 too.... they out engineered Sony by delivering a more efficient system..... but the PS3 was more powerful. You do know that both can be true at the same time right?
  10. Autistic Cop... my discussion was about Xbox1, 1S and PS4..... you know... the topic of the thread.... We already discussed the topic and you agreed they got out engineered in that instance.... We already know OG Xbox was more powerful than PS2. We already know 360 was weaker but better and easier to develop for than PS3.
  11. Point is... Sony out engineered them out of the gate. If we include engineering dates... Sony's will still be ahead because PS4 obviously started its hardware development years before 2012. You yourself said earlier that MS went with the same design philosophy for OG Xbox1 as they did with 360. That right there was a mistake and they got out engineered by Sony. Point blank.
  12. It took MS 4 years (2017) into the Gen to actually engineer a console better than what Sony put out at the beginning of the gen (2013)..... That's a MS engineering victory guiz.. right guiz
  13. Hey clown ass. Development environments evolve and improve overtime. MS was dumb enough to use a similar environment for the Xbox1 that they used in the 7 yr old 360. So while that environment was considered developer friendly last gen.... it became outdated once PS4s came along and was much better. To make matters worse the Xbox1 was also weaker than PS4. now you're basically saying the ENTIRE INDUSTRY ARE LAZY DEVELOPERS because they spoke the truth about Xbox1 developer environment... lmfao
  14. Man why does context always escape your dense ass? Developers praised the 360 because it was a better development environment when compared to the PS3. But for this Gen.... PS4 provides a better development environment than the OG1 and the S. Sony learned from their arrogance with the PS3 and developed a developer friendly console. Now... had they stuck to their guns and made the PS4 as difficult to develop for as the PS3..... then the OG Xbox1 and the S would have been considered more developer friendly. Ideologies didn't flip flop, they'r
  15. lol... the Switch comes with everything you need to take it on the go.
  16. What you mean you don't have a charger? the charger that came with the Dock can be plugged directly into the Switch in handheld mode.
  17. it's a revision not a next gen system launch. They'll have a next gen system for 2020/21 You think they have multi decade contract with NVidia solely for an X1 and nothing else in the pipeline? lol
×
×
  • Create New...