jehurey

Cows as they hear more and more about Switch sales:

Was there any meaningful DLC on Arkham Asylum and Arkham City? I mean, I played the Catwoman missions in Arkham City. I might revisit City because I don't think I did all the Riddler stuff. I think I played Asylum pretty comprehensively. Thats a hell of a free giveaway.

You are literally doing the opposite of "getting it straight" Go lie to yourself somewhere else.

Its if less............its because its missing assets and effects. If you're trying to get by on semantics.........you've already lost. The best version is PS4.

Hasn't he been saying that for like the past 5 years?

Holy shit, the two remaining lemmings are melting down really hard here. One is trying to say that everybody who has a memory is a loser for remembering how pathetic he was back in 2015. And the other is saying that we need to keep paying $60 in order to keep paying Microsoft developers who are re-packaging the same game. This is embarrassing.

I think the part that I enjoy the most is that Dynocrap is perfectly aware that he's wrong........but he's just plugging away like as if he's getting a paycheck to defend Microsoft. ....which leads to the other, more hilarious part, about that.

She's got to have a Type A personality in order to have the body that she has at age 50. She's probably one of those people who are into self-motivation techniques and act like douches all the time. I think Will Smith was in the same place 10 years ago. I heard that the asian girl, Constance Wu "demanded" that she be top billing in this movie, and even though JLo is a producer in this movie, she actually gives top billing to Constance Wu. But that stage dance she gives at the beginning of the movie is not Hollywood strip dancing, she shakes that ass like a r

Wasn't MGS5 noted for not getting really good until Mission 20 into the game? Like the Giant Bomb people said that all the time.

I went to go see Hustlers last night on $5 Tuesdays, and the movie was..........pretty good. Like, if it wasn't for some errant pacing and some underbaked side characters, this would be a really solid crime movie that almost feels like a women's version at attempting a Scorsese crime movie. The only that is somewhat disappointing is the TYPE of crime they are committing is fairly simplistic. But its actually a pretty good attempt at making a movie about strippers that glamorizes that life and then shows the downsides to that life. And JLo.............holy sh

Who was the moron that was trying to downplay PSN accounts because they said that people who bought Sony TVs had to register for a PSN account, and therefore its artificially inflating the numbers? Was that Dynocrap? And now, he's trying to boast about free Xbox accounts being registered for Windows 10 users. LOL

Another Vini failure? And another case of Dynocrap having tunnel vision in a desperate attempt to pretend he was right about something (which also failed).

Yeah............like the Nintendo trailer. you even see the captions of the Nintendo trailer in the GameXplain video. They're just running all accumulated footage in their latest previews, there's even a Q&A 20 minute video in which they're re-running all sorta of trailers and previous footage. The spanish demo has extended footage of the Swamp area, it stays at 30fps for a long time. GameXplain specifically says that the slowdown is "1 to 2 seconds" before going back to 60fps. Like..........why wouldn't you listen specifically to what GameXplain and Dig

Except GameXplain specifically says "its 1 to 2 seconds of slowdown when you move to another area" This is exactly what Digital Foundry says. The video that they're showing may be them cobbling together previous footage for those videos (E3 footage). I mean........they're words that describe this are specific.

GameXplain and DF both state the same exact issue. The spanish demo, for example when he's walking in the swamp water, STAYS at 30 frames the entire time, and actually only rises to 50fps. That's different. Remember, the GameXplain guy already played through the game and is replaying it a second time. His explaination is "1 to 2 seconds slowdown when you enter a new area" That is completely consistent with the Digital Foundry Gamescom demo......Digital Foundry said that demo was "night and day" difference between the oldest E3 demo which always stayed aroun

No..........Gamexplain specifically says its 1 to 2 seconds and only when entering a new area. This is the same exact explanation that Digital Foundry gave, is it not? And you just said that the Spanish demo is WORSE than the Digital Foundry Gamescom demo...........did you not? I need you to confirm those two specific questions.

Except..............GameXplain's video seems like it does. Their explaination of the framerate drop mimics what Digital Foundry said from 3 weeks ago. They said the frame rate drops are only 1 to 2 seconds when entering new areas. Which is different than the Spanish video, in which it stays at 30fps for quite some time. You didn't watch the GameXplain video, did you?

So.........you don't understand the concept of a release date patch?

That doesn't mean its running on the NEWEST VERSION of the game's executable. Are you being serious right now...........or intentionally trolling. The cartridge would have all of the game's content on there. The game's engine could be updated via a patch. You literally think that a version 0.80 and a version 1.00 means that version 1.00 has the latter levels to a video game and versions <1.00 do not??? There's no way you actually believe that.

Because the Gamescom demo is barely a month old, and those demo kiosks were running closed Switch boxes that Digital Foundry couldn't get video from.........which means it wasn't running on cartridge, but rather a different storage. And that Spanish website has the cartridge version, that would've been manufactured two months ago or longer. Its a worldwide Nintendo release, and a major game. They've had the cartridge in manufacturing for quite some time now, they wouldn't have manufactured this within the past 3 weeks.

Gamescom demo. Show me proof that the version build on that cartridge for that Spanish website if further along than the Gamescom build.

No, you don't know its a "more recent" build. Its the game running off of a cartridge that went into manufacturing several weeks ago. So it could be content complete, but still not be final version 1.00 Why are you trying to pretend that you don't understand such things happening when it comes to retail video games?

Why do I need to pretend, when proof of the game running better already exists? lol What do I have to do with this?

So you don't understand the concept of a release date patch? You are being inconsistent............have you heard of a situation in which the final code regressed from a demo build that showed improvement over an older demo build?