jehurey

Why are you trying to make a semantics argument, when you know exactly what I am talking about. You don't see Mark Cerny speak, at-length, about the features of PS Now do you? Because that has no bearing on the Playstation hardware team's long term projects. PS Now is like Sony selling PS Vue, it has just as much bearing on the Playstation hardware team. Which is to say, next-to-nothing.

I think its $479, or $500 that comes with a pack-in of TLOU2. And I think PS+ service will get tier in such a way in which you might need to pay annually for something else. Maybe PS Online is $40 a year but PS+ Free games are $40-$60 a year sold separately.

No, its not bullshit. It probably only furthers PS Now, but PS Now is not going to be replacing Playstation hardware unless A.) Playstation hardware sales start dropping at an alarming rate, or B.) PS Now subscriptions take off at a shocking rate. I don't need to do anything more than look at your VR predictions to know that you aren't batting well in the prediction of gaming trends.

No, its probably a lateral move that has absolutely nothing to do with their gaming division. By your logic..............the deal also called for Sony providing Microsoft with imaging technology and AI, I guess that means Microsoft is desperate for assistance in game development. This deal has no bearing on the future of Playstation. They probably are renting out Azure server space for as cheap or cheaper than what they were paying at AWS. I love making you try to make you labor to make your bullshit fit, because its so easy to break it apart. LOL

Sure, the 100+ million console winner is definitely trying to stay alive.............by signing a deal that the Playstation team wasn't even aware about. Yeah, definitely shows how desperate they are about the future of their gaming division. That's definitely makes the setup to your comeback make sense. LOL You coulda fooled me with them making their push for gaming.........its not like they've shown any actual exclusives for those pieces of hardware you just talked about. Yeah, I expect it to sell quite badly. The people who want high graphi

he's now trying to play stupid for a second time: I love it when he tries to act like he doesn't know what I'm talking about. LOL, this guy is also trying to pretend that he doesn't understand the point of my post. Microsoft was trying to sell 4K just 18 months ago...........and now they are DESPERATELY PLANNING on staying alive in the hardware market by selling a 1080p box, because nobody trusts in the Microsoft platform to plunk down another $500 on them ever again. Here comes more shoulder shrugging.

I like how in order for his joke to work, you have to gloss over the fact that his setup line absolutely makes no sense. Poor guy is almost as desperate as Microsoft. He even had to lower the intelligibility of his joke by one-quarter, as well. LOL

I remember when the Xbox One X was coming out, there were some lemmings in this forum who were trying to say that if you don't have a 4K tv already, then you're completely outdated. Microsoft is trying to stay alive with a 1080p "next-gen" console. This will also help one of my previous arguments because next-gen graphics is not really about resolution, even though these same lemmings tried peddling just that.

Wut? Sony probably saw the above-decent sales numbers and realized they didn't need to put that on fire-sale just yet. That's fine, I know it will be a $15 item by Christmas. I'd like to see retail copies of Tetris Effect go back down to $20.

"stop pretending to care, you're just virtue-signaling" [those same exact people then make a thread pretending to be outraged at some tranny winning girls 400m dash races]

Y'know, he may be auditioning.....

Its become its own PUBLISHING division. LOL Its literally going to be running on hardware manufactured and supervised under the Azure team. That's merging the Xbox hardware division. Phil Spencer will never oversee a new Xbox design for CONSUMER HARDWARE as long as he's employed at Microsoft. It ended with Scarlett and Anaconda. Maybe he might get to work on a new controller refresh. lol

So Microsoft did to lemmings what Nintendo did to sheep with Zelda Twilight Princess and BOTW. All these years just so that they can finally reveal the game...........on another platform you have to buy.

I think Google will keep it at $20/month, or possibly combine it with like their Youtube Premium or Google Music subscription for like $30/month And it will be "all games" available to play, except I think they would institute a cap on how many people can play a certain game at any one time. I think Google will go to the game developers and say that they are not treat it as one game license = one subscription but rather "we're buying (or leasing) 500,000 licenses of your game for X amount of months, we get to have our users share the game licenses, but we limit the amou

We already caught him once trying to use the PC to support his theory that "most people buy digital anyways" He did have graphs for the consoles, people CLEARLY bought physical copies of Witcher 3 more than digital. We caught him peddling that bullshit just last week..............and here he is trying to do it again.

There's more than just grains of salt, Michael Ironside did voiceover for a DLC pack for Ghost Recon early last year. He got really mad the moment you caught him trying to change his argument. Really mad, and then spewed for 3 pages straight. LOL

Now its "Nadellas's vision" Yeah. Here's a clip of how that conversation for his "vision" went down with Phil Spencer

voice over is "generated"? Chances are they had like 8 different people do the entire voiceover.

The people who are pushing streaming subscription have one thing in common. They aren't currently developing a single game that is exciting people. Mario Maker 2 on a streaming service or integrated in some web browser would be a hit.................because its a premier video game company making a highly addictive and appealing game to the masses. And if Google and Microsoft don't have that, then the "tech" doesn't matter, now matter how nifty it is. You have no idea what Sony is doing, but one thing is certain, the people in charge of Sony's co

Its better than 12 month droughts.

No. The name of the game........is games. Always has been, always will be. The phone industry, with its 800 million phones currently active around the world......should've killed the 3DS. And you made a NEW excuse for that even though highly success mobile phone games exist. New technology doesn't not kill "old" technology........unless new technology has games as good as old technology. Its that simple. And the plain fact of the matter is that xCloud is going to be running on Xbox One S, the xCloud first-party lineup is probably goin

They'll have more games this year, clearly.

Ok............I'm looking at streaming technology that is primarily a one-way delivery method that can actually pre-load upcoming information. Why do you keep comparing game streaming when Music/Movies/TV have advantages that gaming can never have because it has to succeed with low-lag two-way high-speed communication or else it COMPLETELY fails. Its like building the best console and it completely sucks because the controller cannot communicate effectively with the console. You're using Music/Movies/TV to help prop up gaming. Streaming is not go

And more powerful than the Xbox One X version as well. Those GTX 670's are delivering 2.7 TFLOPS each, for 5.4 TFLOPS, and since those are nVidia performance metrics, thats probably about 7TFLOPS in AMD GCN performance. Yeah those old nVidia gpus in SLI would do the trick. Wonder what the cost was.

LOL there are definitely people here who want to portray xCloud as Microsoft actually getting in front of the next upcoming gaming trend. So much so, they actually WANT to wish traditional console gaming hardware to fail. They want to act all Nostradamus on the subject. So when they can't really prove that streaming will bring in new gamers, they switch the argument to "well, uh......it will steal traditional gamers who are tired of having to buy hardware!!!" No, it will attract traditional gamers who don't see the value of their hardware platform because th