jehurey

Yeah.........by charging a cut. How could you not possibly see that its answered.............are you really that butthurt to try and achieve something? Its would be free money for Nintendo for allowing the app. The more the app grows, the more money Nintendo would make. Whatever potential losses they could have by having the app is offset by the money they make off the app. All of this can be ascertained by simply thinking about what I just typed. lol

Wait a minute, did the guy say "I bet you guys are wondering about Bayonetta 3, huh?" And then proceeded to say or show nothing?

I already told you, its in the my post, how Nintendo would allow them on there. You don't need to ask when it was already answered. Go back and read.

This open's up the possibility of them remaking the old top-down Zelda games with that game engine, which essentially looks like the 3D Mario/Captain Toad Treasure Tracker game engine. Link's Awakening is a good game to start.

New Hideko Kamiya IP. Astral Chain. Another Switch exclusive. Dude, I was watching that trailer and thinking that looks like Scalebound.

Nintendo is taking back the Final Fantasy series. About 20 years too late, tho. LOL

Oh crap, that 4chan rumor might be coming true.

Hellblade port coming to Switch????

Daemon X Machina demo coming later today. BOOM

So for the new Fire Emblem, the in-game character models now pretty much look like the anime designs?

So they ended up using the same type of engine as in the PS4 version? Man, it looks like they added some extra polish to that Yoshi game. it was already a nice looking game.

Who's the one that made the assertion that Nintendo wouldn't let them on in the first place? That was you. nice to see that you lead yourself to a conclusion, and pretended that it was me saying it. Nintendo would probably demand a cut of all purchases made, or maybe negotiate a flat-rate fee for having the app on their platforms. "Paying rent" so to speak. How many pieces of hardware is Microsoft going to find where, once they boot up the app, they have actual game controls to play the games? Microsoft NEEDS something like the Switch

Except the customer went out of their way to buy hardware for ANOTHER company's games. A streaming app is not a deal breaker. People aren't buying Android devices and thinking to themselves "GEE...........i should plop down $60 on a large scale game so I can try to stream it from my Phone/Tablet." Microsoft should be trying to get its software into Smart TVs like Roku is, and then maybe they can get customers that way because its a nice setting to have a gaming streaming app right in your television. Chances are, there's going to be a $99 small Xbox "box" th

And their competitors can end their business at the drop of a hat, but removing them from their console. How's that for victory? Building a house on land you don't own and be taken from you at any moment. And you're trying to say that other people aren't using their heads. Google will also be entering in that space. I don't even expect Microsoft to be the best game streaming service out there.

If everybody buys Android phones....but they all put the Apple appstore in it, isn't it KIND OF like an overall victory for Apple?

Dynocrap is trying really hard to move the goalposts. "Actually, guiz, Xbox being a streaming app everywhere is the most amazing victory in the history of video games, they essentially win ALL console gens!!"

You know thats pretty dumb. Red Steel 3? If he's right, that would make it the single most impressive rumor that turned out to be true in quite a long time. I think he was too specific for it to be believable.

What about the game. Its an open world game, I remember there being some train sequence. What is the moment to moment gameplay like?

Pay full price for games that will have lag and can pixelate. Oh yeah, that definitely looks like winning.

They can't even say that "more than 10 million" people have Gamepass. On a console that has (supposedly) sold 40 million. We know there isn't an actual userbase of 40 million Xbox One console owners. They are clearly a smaller userbase that has purchased multiple Xbox One consoles because they are replacing the launch version, with the S version, or some of them replaced their launch version with the X version. Or some of them have even go as far as buying all three versions. There's plenty of overlap, probably moreso than any other previous console and their hardware v

"i'm beggin' ya"

SOCOM Battle Royale. Its too logical.

This will result in the next Xbox not selling as much hardware, because no-disc drive versus the Playstation having more flexibility is going to be a deal-breaker for alot of people. It doesn't matter if the average person is buying more digital games these days. People want to have that ability. Redbox is still a thing, Gamefly is still a thing. Using Steam PC gamers as an EXAMPLE for justify this is reaching, at best. Gamers can access the files on their hard drive, They can make backups (easily). As the years went on, Steam became more trustworthy. its a

Aza is right, if the "mainstream" model is the discless one, then the $500-$600 ultra, renders everything at 4K model probably won't have a disc drive either. Because retailers are not going to devote shelf space for ONE version of an Xbox console, that isn't even the main console. Retailers will be pissed that the console went digital

What unique code or verification method would be "registered" online to Microsoft? Unless you are saying that they have to do the registration with another piece of Xbox hardware that has the disc drive and can verify it as an authentic disc copy. Let's say you're a lapsed former X360 owner, never touched an Xbox One (which is very common), and now want to buy a discless console. How would they go about transferring their game discs digitally?