jehurey

But if whatever plan you introduce isn't 100% perfect and 100% effective........then why bother doing it at all?

I wanted to download the game to my X360, just in case they deactivated the purchase from my account. So I pulled out my X360 that I hadn't used since 2015, and wouldn't you know, the fucking thing was giving me the red ring of death. Fortunately, I read that it could be related to the hard drive, so to remove the hard drive and try turning it on again, and then if it boots properly, turn it back off and re-connect the HDD again. It worked, thank goodness.

no, it got derailed by jonbutthurt. if you notice........i'm still trying to talk about the subject. while he spends his time talking about me.

They are there because Democratic politicians are the only ones willing to put them there. Republicans block it, and therefore at the federal level, it cannot happen as long as Republicans block it. They block it, because they have permission from their voters to do so. I don't need to be obssessed with winning this argument. You don't have anything to provide a counter-argument. My points are perfectly sound. I'm not the one getting mad. I'm not the one obsessing over something, or somebody, either. Next time, try making a coherent argument that

You're not talking about politicians..........yet you claimed that states had passed mental health checks. Who passed those background checks for mental checks..............REGULAR PEOPLE? Or politicians voted by the people? No...........you are the one who has been trying to change the topic, in fact you did it from the very beginning You lost the argument. We know you did................because you're not arguing it anymore, and seem to want to talk about me. You're done. And the more you talk about me, the more done you are.

Besides the obvious NRA data graph regarding Republican politicians. I guess Republicans politicians just go out of their way to appease the NRA in DIRECT CONTRADICTION with the people that vote for them? No..............prove what you just claim. Show me those states. Stalling isn't going to help.............you're going to lose this argument.

Sorry, mimicking me doesn't work either. You don't have any evidence. If I'm not seeing something.................SHOW IT. Which states are fine with mental health background checks.............and we'll check to see if they are predominantly Republican or Democratic legislatures who run those states. Show it.

He is now saying that the media is "alt left"??????? So basically he's not even really trying to make a genuine argument, anymore. he's just trying to name-call his way out of this. Yeah, that won't work, either.

It would be 1.) An ADDITIONAL requirement for getting a gun 2.) A national register created by the federal government and 3.) Collects personal information from all people in all 50 states, mandatory, superseding States' rights. And you're telling me Republican voters would NOT have a problem with that????????? This isn't a debate..........you're not even close to remotely being correct here. And notice that you're not even making an argument anymore...........you're just back to talking about me. Argue the argument. If you

No...........they're not random. I don't accuse right-wingers of being pro-NRA and anti-government RANDOMLY. Why are you even attempting to play naive here............this is standard stuff that I am talking about. For traditional republican voters, it is VERY high on their list for voting for Republicans. Yes it is. This is not even up for debate. You don't have any proof of your "REAL people". You are making it up as you go along..............because you can't find evidence to win this argument that I am making. NA

No...........I just proved my point. Why would we be arguing about theoretical 2nd amendment people WHO DON'T VOTE. Dude, there's no point in you trying to play dumb here...............last week, you were trying to poke holes in my plan about gun regulation laws......its funny how you were trying to argue for realism last week...........but this week, you don't want to involve Real Policy, Real Politicians, who are determined by Real Voters. You just want to talk in vague generalities. Sorry, not gonna work.

I'm sorry, but it is quite obvious that VR on the PC has clearly slowed down. And it looks like Oculus is definitely cutting its future investment in high-end VR on the PC. So that means that PSVR justified itself as a decent add-on with the games that they delivered to their userbase for these past 2 years. And it looks like VR on the Playstation is going to have a future, if the patents are any indication. Developers on Oculus are going to move to the smaller, lighter version, and that will mean that those developers will easily be able to have those games on PSVR an

Sorry, you seem to be trying to obfuscate your argument (probably because you're losing). We are talking about REAL SOLUTIONS to the problem. Real solutions have to involve policy. Policy has to involve politicians. The only people that matter are the ones who influence policy through the politicians they choose. (aka actual voters) You're trying to make excuses to not argue in any specific detail...................not gonna work with me.

sorry, you are not depicting republicans accurately. Republican politicians take pledges to abide by all positions that the NRA promotes, and they get graded on how they align themselves to NRA positions. Gee, sure does seems like almost all republicans seem to align themselves with that organization that YOU just classified as "extremist"

No. the average right-winger is against "big government". a national registry that is tied to guns is basically the cornerstone of right-wing bogeyman nightmares. i am NOT talking about a niche right-wing minority. Not even close. This is a standard position of the NRA.........are you calling them an extremist outlier?

no, 2nd amendment people correlate highly.HIGHLY with being anti-big-government you can try arguing that............but you're definitely not going to come close to discrediting that. they are, after all, two huge tenets of today's right-wing ideology.

like i said regarding mental health.... its the most logical place to start.

https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/p/crackdown/c3vnjhhd7mm4?activetab=pivot%3Aoverviewtab Canada https://www.microsoft.com/en-ca/p/crackdown/c3vnjhhd7mm4?activetab=pivot:overviewtab

heh, google "national gun registry" and see what comes up. a report on your mental health is also a medical report, and there are medical privacy laws.

Because it would be a nationwide database, and a national wide database for mental health meant for gun background checks would ostensibly mean a nationalwide registered gun owner database. And 2nd amendment diehards are strictly against that. Remember, its not just the crazies who would be in the database, everyone would have needed to pass a mental health care check (probably within a certain period of time). So that means the database would have to have mental health care checks and reporting for everybody who is trying to obtain a gun. That means those d

If he had a record in the army about his mental health condition, then this would be the second time that this is happening. I believe the Sutherland Springs church shooter in Texas (he shot like 50 people), was also in the army, and they had disclosed their mental health files for that person for background checks. Which once again, points to the obvious that, we need to implement mental checks in schools, and get these types of guys checked and keep a file, and that needs to turn into a universal database. Which definitely freaks the fuck out of the second-amendment p

Hmmmmmmmmm, you sure would be opening up a slippery slope for every other thread from here on out. But hey...........if I'm hearing straight from you....

Because he's still trying to talk about me in this thread. Its not an exaggeration........its literally still happening. He's trying to derail the thread...........he already admitted it in a previous post that he doesn't want this thread to exist.

Some joke...........considering that I kept on talking about it in many of my posts afterwards. You have an anger problem.............and I can't solve that for you.

So it seems like you just admitted that you only defend white people. No.......I started talking about social-outcast people, which is a clear reference to mental health...............from my very first post. Sorry..........but you want to talk about me to DERAIL this thread............you just admitted. Its not going to work.