jehurey

No I can't tell. …………...because you aren't. You made that statement to reassure YOURSELF. No point in trying to portray it in any other way. lol

Probably so...……..if I have nothing but Xboxes. But then again, I'd have no customers there to sue me if I had an Xbox gaming café.

Except you only ask these questions...…...not because you're genuinely interesting in finding out, but rather because you use them to only support ONE narrative that you favor over any other possibility. That's why I called it Glenn Beck/Fox News style of question.

I love how you start talking like Glenn Beck or some Fox News pundit with these open-ended questions with obvious insinuations. Right AFTER I accuse you of having certain biases...…..jesus.

No dude...………...you're just butthurt beyond redemption and are looking to try and say that I'm dumb. lol You don't know the interaction with these people, and you are trying really hard to make this an open and shut case. Which exposes your pathetic biases. That's your shortcoming. Not mines.

Well then maybe the boss may have told the employees that they need to mitigate situations in which customers are having a shit fit for ANY reason. Dude...……..my brother runs a major corporate chain restaurant, he tells me stories of people who DO NOT DESERVE good customer service. Let me explicit with that phrase, for any normal person hearing his stories, you would not side with the customer, but you STILL mitigate these people because YOU HAVE MORE TO LOSE as a business owner. This is not a situation of a Regular Person vs Regular Person. You have more to lose as a

Well I don't see where the conflicting story is, unless I'm missing another quote from the owner. But it would be odd that the owner is making things much more complicated for himself than he needs to be in order to fire these employees.

Then that means that SOMETHING ELSE happened in that interaction that they determined it to be negative. And we don't know what it is.

Does their policy teach them to treat a black women differently? I love how you keep on clinging onto the closing time as "Policy" Its like I'm speaking to a child at his first debate. lol

It is interesting because the guy doesn't need any reason to fire the white employees in an "at will" state. Which is what Oregon is. He could walk in on any day, and say "I don't need you" and fire them on the spot, and hire two different people on that same day. Hmmmmmmmmmmm……….seems like you and Ghost constructed a narrative that doesn't hold up to the slightest bit of logical scrutiny.

If you fucked up one day...………….then you fucked up, period. You must not know what work is like. Because that's all it takes. Its a service job....………….you're quite replaceable. Look at how this is making you melt down, I feel like I'm in a 9th grade ethics debate class. LOL

And did they treat her the same as the white women...…...or did they speak to her differently. Same concept applies. I even talked about HOW they tell her that the stores is closed could potentially be grounds to different treatment.

And you don't know if the store has admitted people after closing time before. Therefore...…...you are in no position to determine if the employees were fired unfairly or not. Once again...…………..THIS...………..SIMPLE...……...POINT has been explained to you multiple times.

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand you're done. Thank you for admitting that you PURPOSELY want to avoid that point I've made several times.

I have. And I've gone to stores and been allowed in. The question is whether these employees treated this black woman differently. I love how I've explained that SPECIFIC PHRASE about 6 times to you...…………...and you pretend to IGNORE it every...……..single...……..time. You've all but assured that you know you can't win this argument.

He's now completely RUNNING AWAY from his argument. …………...and revealing his true feelings. aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand Sinkuh! poor guy thinks that making of fun of black people is somehow going to affect me. LOL He doesn't know what to do.

His argument is now relying on the sign. So...…….if they left the sign on, by accident, then they are still open? LOL he's making it so easy for me now.

Do you have proof that the Employer specifically made up new rules out of nowhere to fire these employees? I love how you are absolutely melting down at this point...………….you can't win your argument, so now you're just trying to make fun of me because I talked about a gaming café a couple of weeks ago. LOL I love it when you make it obvious.

No...………...you are conveniently leaving out an important part of the argument that I already told you MULTIPLE times, several posts ago: I love how I just BUS-TED you trying to mis-represent what I said.

Except if they are still in the store...……...they are still being paid by the boss. If they locked up the store and are going home, then you would have a more valid argument. CLOSING TIME may not mean that is when the employee's working hours are over. WHY are you still acting like you don't know what happens at these service jobs?

It does. If the boss has told you to allow customers at or after closing time before...…….and specifically sees you treat somebody else different, then chances are you're gonna get fired. Why are you acting like somebody who has never worked before? Do you think constructing an argument out of NAIVETE is going to help you here??? LOL

No...…….they don't. Especially when its small, independent businesses. Your FLAW...…….....and it is a FLAW...……...is that you think this is a McDonalds or some other corporate chain.

And the business owner can replace them with workers who will go the extra mile. I love how you guys are trying to play so innocent here.

No...……….not for an independent small business. You actually think they TURN AWAY paying customers...……………...at small, independent business...…….like they do at your corporate McDonalds or Starbucks? This is your CONTINUING FLAW in your argument.

You don't know that they were "following policy" because if they have ever ALLOWED anybody into the store at closing time before...……..then that policy is now at the mployee's discretion. You...…………….don't...………...KNOW...…...any of this, or how any of this went down. You know exactly what I have been saying these past few posts...…….you're just trying to play dumb. lol