jehurey

No, I'm talking about both things. You're the one that tried to dismiss the Johnny Chung Lee example........you were making "this immersion is better than that immersion" type of argument. So I simply went alot and followed you on that tangent. The main accomplishment of VR isn't the stereoscopic effect...........its the tracking of your eyes/head.

So are two flat screens that are two inches from your face. At the end, its your eyes that perform the "magic trick". Same would apply with 3D software-based graphics.

A couple of months ago, when I was channel surfing, I watched the first few minutes of Open Range, a 2003 movie starring Robert Duvall and Kevin Costner. And the imagery felt so beautiful and just, like, it felt like something I needed to see that was different from all the other dark and gritty movies. So I have it on DVR and finally watched it. What a beautiful movie. Like a great palette cleanser. Just beautiful imagery that is meant to represent Montana in 1882 (I think it was filmed in Alberta) And both Duvall and Costner go to great lengths to convey r

They're trying to boast about incredibly silly things. People do not like having to wear things in order to enjoy a visual effect. They'll prefer their eyes and faces to be completely free of any burdens.

No, its immersive, that youtube video was quite a big hit when it came out. If the window genuinely behaves like a window, then the gimmick is a success. In a VR helmet makes your eyes tired or causes people to feel claustrophobic.........then the immersion isn't holding up. Your brain is used to having plenty of space in front of your eyeballs and not having something covering up your eyes. Your brain DOES NOTICE that it has LED screens 2 inches from your eyeballs...........there is nothing you can say that will convince anybody otherwise. Even

Dynocrap explicitly is saying that with his "2D gamers" comments. Like the Johnny Chung Lee video points out, the graphics on a screen that is static to the position of your eyes makes the imagery appear "flat" When it adjusts the in-game camera with your eye's position, the gimmick is rather immersive. Sensors that track your eyes and your movement is the "magic trick" that makes VR work. Except you just decided to omit the final part of my last post: The "looking into a window into another world" genuinely DOES FEEL like "looking in

Except we've had other 3D image devices before. The accomplishment isn't with the screens............in fact the screens achieving stereoscopic 3D are the OLDEST gimmick being implemented. That's a term that's existed since the 50's. Modern VR is derived by the accomplishment of accelerometers and sensors. Yes the video I posted ABSOLUTELY has to do with immersion, the person specifically says that. The screen is irrelevant because the screen could be different, it could be an ultra-wide monitor that gives you a wider view of the world, if the sensors are p

The images don't give you perceived depth. THe proximity of the images to your eyes provide that immersion. At the end of the day.......the trick doesn't work unless people have two working eyeballs. If anything the accelerometers and sensors are the real accomplishment in achieving the immersion. We've known this for quite some time:

check the poster's IP address and compare it with sheepkilla's he magically found a person who hasn't even posted yet?

i'm apparently fueled by the bitch pheromones being released remotely. like so.

No, it does. I think you don't want to answer because it debunks your attempt to sound clever. If you could embarrass me by answering it, you would've done it by now.

so, are you going to answer the question I just asked? or run away from it?

Wait...........so your VR device isn't displaying images on a screen that is flat? Its using some sort of actual 3D physical image display?

Bill Gates officially stepped down from Microsoft's board just this past March. He has no official position within the corporation. There's nothing there for lemmings to take credit for. If anything, Bill Gates dumped the dead weight so that he can focus on something more productive. He can save us from a once-in-a-century pandemic..............because those odds are better than him trying to save the utter failure that was Xbox gaming.

No, you don't have facts on your side. I mean............you're clearly ignorant, and you don't have any evidence to back up your worldview.

Watched HBO's new movie, Bad Education, starring Hugh Jackman and Alison Janney. Pretty good. Its like a flashy crime movie about people getting away with stuff, and then it all crumbling down on them. But they're not mobsters or anything like that.

a 30 something "having issues" is not extremely rare. In fact its when they begin to have issues. every year that passes, you are more compromised than the previous. you are saying things to yourself that are quite short-sighted.

you're basically saying as long as a "medical complication" doesn't occur to you, you don't have to worry about your compromised lung capacity from being a problem in the event of an emergency.

LOL no, smoking doesn't have any OUTWARDLY visible effect that appears to be life-threatening when you are in your 30's. You have weak lungs. If your body has to undergo something, or suffers an emergency attack, your lungs won't survive long enough in a situation in which they need to give you oxygen within a matter of minutes.

Japanese media is reporting that Kim Jung Un is in a "vegetative state". On Monday, the Daily NK (an online newspaper in South Korea run by North Korean defectors who have contacts in the country) reported that Kim Jong-un had had surgery on April 12th and was recovering. Reuters subsequently picked it up and ran the story internationally. CNN picked it up and went to its sources in U.S. intelligence, who weren't willing to be named but said they were monitoring reports that Kim wasn't doing well. On Tuesday, U.S. National Security Adviser Robert O'Brien acknowle

.............while losing GTA5 on Gamepass. Game with more replay value, and longer-lasting multiplayer. RDR2 does look very pretty though. But anybody who already plunked down $500 for an XBX would know that already, so they almost certainly paid the full $60 for the game when it came out 18 months ago.

I kept on replying with actual responses, actually trying to make an egaging discussion. You DROPPED YOUR ACT........and went straight to calling me stupid. Nobody would lose their shit with 3 posts of me engaging in such discussion. You're not fooling anybody. Look at your post, right now.............I don't need to do anything except tell other people to observe you're first few sentences. What did I "argue my way out of"?????????? My question was already answered, and I had no other business in this post. YOU created an argument. N

Sorry the "put in this much effort" tactic isn't going to work, either. ...........look at your own posts. You melting down like an absolutely complete bitch. And the people seeing this are going to know that you are doing this because you got angry over a QUESTION being asked??????? Who's going to believe your side of the story. LOL You've been in "check" this entire time, on the chessboard. lol

No........nobody has ever lost their shit, this badly, over ANY type of question. You're not going to cover up what you did here........you melted down badly. That's not my problem. You know you messed up, you're trying right now to think I'm the one who's lost their shit over this. That ain't workin', 'neither. Its not my fault you're acting like a bitch. You control that. Not me.

No........you don't get to dictate how I post. People post questions all the time. Nobody turns into a bitch over them. ..........except you ........over mines. That's not my problem That's not anybody elses problem in this forum. That is, exclusively..........your problem. And nobody can solve it for you. Except you. Put at least half the effort in solving that as you do being a complete and utter bitch, and maybe you might make progress.