jehurey

No problem..........I didn't know that the guy was smart......until you typed that he was "smart as fuck" Thanks alot for that, it also helped out alot of people.

Its the lines he does after transitioning to another topic that are the most amazing. He would have to have enough knowledge to elaborate on those subjects.

Perfect way to end it.

That running back has been da MVP thus far, if he's got enough in him to try and secure one more first-down, that should do it.

I didn't know that the Bills had a 16-0 lead and then proceed to blow the game. I remember both doing that previously, but with the lead double in size. 1993. The Houston Oilers blew a 35-3 lead to the Bills, and lost 41-35 in the playoffs. Guess they returned the favor.

That Houston QB surviving what was supposed to be a double-sack, getting out of that was amazing, its even more amazing that he was able to run out and actually be able to successfully find a guy a make a pass, and even more amazing that the guy was able to pick up 7-8 yard after the catch to get the first down, and THEN run an additional 25-30 yards to seal the deal. That's almost on the level of that Eli Manning play from 12 years ago.

Too bad RE4 is getting delayed into next year. Instead of being GoTY for 2004, it'll be GoT..............oh, wait, the year won't matter because it'll be the best game of all time

This isn't even a new criticism, I've been hearing it since 15 years ago. FF7 wasn't even the best JRPG from Square during the PS1 era. All the nostalgia...............ALL OF IT............stems from its production values. That is the only thing FF7 is noteworthy for. That and a memorable story moment in the game.

Giantbomb is 100% personality driven. Its all about their podcast and their live streaming segments, and it boils down to whether you like the banter between Gerstmann, Brad Shoemaker, Vini Caravela, and Alex Navarro, who are the 2005-era Gamespot guys.

I liked Dan Ryckert because it caused Alex Navarro to talk less during the Beastcast. And he's got more practical views on video games, like as if he's still more of a genuine 15 year old boy. So the snooty video games doesn't impress him. But he was also annoying on occasion. And I think I preferred him better on the west coast podcast. So, this departure isn't exactly the biggest deal. But its starting to feel like both podcasts are in a state of stagnation, the main guys that I like, they are starting to sound like they're tired . I keep on thinking of Ch

That video is fake. Nothing else in his youtube channel. He could've added a video of himself presenting the video. The video quality is actually a little too good for some kid with a camcorder. And the video stuttering effects are too much, if its stuttering it would be constant.

That they expect to work with them for a long time, and he clearly means that it will be more than just the Switch. You have NOTHING that proves your theory. And your belief are worth nothing. nVIdia's CEO making a public statement like that, as the head of a publicly traded company.........will always carry more weight than yours. If only you had somebody else's opinion that backs up your PREDICTION of Nintendo's-nVidia's business relation that would help give your theory any weight. But, alas, you don't. It was easy for

His beliefs carry more weight than yours. Right? There's no way you have a chance in that context. lol

In that case, the nVIdia CEO is saying that the relationship will last two decades. So.........even better, and even MUCH more logical to come to the conclusion that they will be using nVIdia's future GPU technology. There's really not much for you to counter with here. Nobody is making the extremely narrow depiction of Nintendo's and nVidia's business relationship..............except you. Everything else indicates otherwise. Nintendo is going to use future nVidia GPU tech. That's not an outlandish statement, that's practical and logical.

Yes he is: Straight from the horses mouth. And that timetable falls under the existing 10 year span. Dude.............Nintendo has moved over to nVidia's development tools. They will be using nVidia hardware, their FUTURE hardware, for many years. There is nothing, no proof, no evidence, no quote, no NOTHING that you have that indicates this is a one-and-done business arrangement. Nintendo picked the right horse for future GPUs.

He's clearly talking about Switch 2. I'm not taking your INTERPRETATION of what he said. he is clearly talking about a Switch 2...........and that automatically debunks your claim, outright. You're not winning this argument.........even you know that you don't have anything to work with.

Yes he does. he clearly mentions a Switch 2..........which would be a different hard generation. You clearly said that nVIdia is contracted to make the SAME GPU for 10 years. You just said. he is clearly talking NOT JUST new hardware generations, but even if Nintendo changes what type of hardware platform they want to deliver games on.

That's a post of me mocking you. You thought that was a LYNCH PIN to winning your argument?

Yeah, that's EASILY proven wrong. https://www.pcmag.com/news/349540/nvidia-expects-20-year-relationship-with-nintendo-thanks-to nVIdia CEO is clearly talking about different hardware generations, and not the 2017 Switch hardware being the ONLY GPU hardware they will ever manufacture for them. You've been Checkmate'd. This is direct proof that nVIdia expects to work with Nintendo on multiple forms of GPU generations for a long time. Like I said...............that 10 year contract is looking better and better as time passes by.

No, its semantics. Talking about whether something may be occurring or having occurred has no bearing on what we are arguing about. Sorry, that's definitely semantics............and that ain't gonna work.

No, the two reason I have given do not conflict with one another. Platinum CEO guy can say things relating to his OWN company, as long as the news involves something that ONLY DEALS with their own company. Therefore, him hinting that they may be ushering a new phase of how they develop games is an announcement that contains no legal ramifications for nobody else other than Platinum. Which means my theory makes LEGAL sense. And me pointing out the legal ramifications regarding Microsoft makes sense, and would be a good enough reason to discredit y

Wait a minute.............are you saying that Nintendo's contract with nVIdia was going to be manufacturing GPU ONLY for the existing Switch hardware as we know it? And that they would just make the same hardware with the same GPU from 2017 to 2027. Is that what you are claiming? That's a Yes or No question.

Ampere is going to be the upcoming default nVidia architecture, along with the change in manufacturing process. Nintendo has a 10 year contract that ties them to nVIdia GPUs. That is established. Hey...........if nVIdia is creating ALTERNATE GPU architectures and alternate manufacturing processes.........you let me know. Maybe Nintendo could use the alternate.

I think MS may be acquiring Platinum Games By Remij_, 3 hours ago in System Wars (he's not going to attempt a semantics argument at this point, is he?)

So you are admitting that you are trying to connect what Platinum CEO guy is saying to what Phil is saying. ............with no logical proof whatsoever. You're creating that entirely on your own. And that is what makes it baseless speculation. In fact, I've given you a BUSINESS and LEGAL reason why it would be illogical for the Platinum CEO guy to be hinting at something that has business and legal ramifications for a public traded company like Microsoft. I've already point this out to you twice.........and you've pretended that you didn't see i