jehurey

Nope, those are your twisted words. And I am saying "correct" to your first sentence The fact that he was able to act is part of the heroic part. Gee, that was able to dismantle.

No........you changed it to hero. And there is nothing I have said that remotely trashes them or insinuates that they aren't hero, especially since I clearly insinuated that they were all brave, and I literally said that ex-FBI guy is "good guy with a gun" and that he has "the fastest and cleanest shot" possible. Dude.........you are in a complete Tit-Pinch Rage right now, and you don't know what to do with yourself, do you? You don't even know WHAT you can argue, you're just scrambling to argue anything. Why are you making this so easy for me? I

No, I answered it, and I even told you that I was providing the answer. You clearly got nothing at this point. This is pretty much become a measure of just how bitch-tit angry I've got you. I'm curious to see for myself.

Sorry.........you pretending that they weren't answered, when I've already answered and then REPEATED the answer......isn't going to work. It doesn't impress me how much times you smash your skull against the brickwall, you still lost against the brickwall.

Look at where I got you at. Especially considering the fact that I already said "they were all brave"........and in my first post I said "that's AS CLEAN and AS FAST a shot you'll see" Gee, does that sound like me trashing the guy? Boy, you are absolutely grinded down, at this point. I haven't beaten you down this thoroughly in quite a while. lol

Yup, he just admitted that he's intentionally derailing the thread. @Cookester15@Alphonse@madmaltese

Except I already did answer your question. I specifically said that the guy in the corner who has no gun is "MORE brave", meaning that they are all brave and he was the bravest. You lost...........and you know it. Go run away, you've fulfilled all the steps. Thanks for giving me that list, it'll make it easy to see where you are currently at.

Really, here's my post. Point out where i make it about me? Now look at your post. Who is derailing this thread and making it about one particular poster?

If you got nothing to say on this subject. Leave the thread. You can contact the mods directly. Otherwise, you're actually making posts to derail this thread................so, if you do it again, it will be an admission that you know you are intentionally derailing the thread.

Yikes, @kaz really goes to show that these guys are not in this thread to talk about the incident. This is all just pent=up butthurt over me. And they can't control it.

Sorry, you attempting to obfuscate and twist sentiments isn't working. You've clearly lost the argument. I even called the guy in the corner "MORE brave" because he was able to stall the guy long enough to provide for the whole 6 seconds. They are all doing a brave thing, but nobody is expected to be a John Wayne.........because Twinblade was saying that Victim #1 somehow UNDERPERFORM or FAILED to do something that was expected of him. I'm actually saying that Victim #1 had no chance to pull of a proper shot, and I used ex-FBI to show that he wouldn'

Ah............so you just got caught LYING, and claiming I did something I didn't do. And you are still raging like a little bitch. Like i said..............those aren't my responsibilities to fix your problems, nor is it the forum's responsibility. Go cry somewhere else.

That was a response to Twinblade saying that Victim #1 somehow "failed" by "being nervous" Do you understand that I was actually telling Twinblade that Victim #1 did NOT FAIL on any real level?, Dude.........like, are you seriously missing that? I go to show that Victim #1 has no chance.......and I explain that by saying ex-FBI were to be placed in Victim #1 spot, and he draws his weapon exactly the same.............ex-FBI guy DIES JUST LIKE VICTIM #1. You're the one that is "running" with shit.......and no surprise, you clearly seem to be gettin

Really? Point out the insult in my post: I'll wait. You need to control yourself. You clearly have a problem with your temperament...........but that's my responsibility, now is it?

No, that is easily debunked here in my first post: Point out the sarcasm there. Wow, your hatred has completely consumed you. Unfortunately, that's not my problem to solve. That's yours. Unless you point a gun at somebody, but hopefully they won't blame your incel-rage at me.

Wow, you sound butthurt. I said that he doesn't get to be a hero unless there aren't two bodies in front of him to GIVE HIM the 6 seconds he needs. Are you not understanding that? Go be mad somewhere else.........in fact, you're faking your outrage, its so obvious.

Saucer ended up headshotting himself. lol Let's chalk it up to.......ahem..........performance anxiety. It is common, after all, if you read the FBI profile on incels.

Except I clearly call him that here: Holy shit...........are you actually on Step 6 of your own list right now? Absolutely perfect

Except I was referring to the 20/20 example. Gee, i wonder why you deleted the rest of the post. Wow, you got busted trying to bullshit. Didn't worrk. Another headshot.

Saucer right now:

What are you talking about.......I called him John Wayne from the very beginning. I'm the one who labelled him that in this thread. Wow, I got you swinging at air right now. And you're trying to run away, as well.

This is the internet, so you have infinite bullets. So you just take your time to aim steady. Use the church video of me steadily John Wayne'ing you for reference on how to do it properly.

Don't worry, take your time.

Little too late on the draw there. ............again (headshot)

The more I think about it, the more its obvious that Saucer does have quite a bit in common with the shooter. They're both incels. They're both wearing black trenchcoats like its still 1997 And they both need to purchase their facial hair. And they both make the mistake of thinking they can take on Texans when it comes to guns, and losing that matchup the hard way.