Jump to content

Mr. House

Lemming
  • Content Count

    31,680
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    119

Posts posted by Mr. House

  1. 1 minute ago, Twinblade said:

    Government Security agencies around the world should use FO76 to torture people. I can't think of anything more painful than being forced to play that game.

    What's so bad about FO76? The worst thing is the deceptive 'free to play' business model that force high level players to get a sub or otherwise it's unplayable. 

    And I guess the story is weak but that goes with being a MMO. That and dungeons being instances, so if you lose your connection you're back to square one and lose all progress. That's the reason I stopped playing because I lost connection in the hardest dungeon, just before I finally had my nukes.

     

    Otherwise, the Appalachian region is awesome, probably one of the best and largest Bethesda map. The community interactions are awesome. The gameplay is pretty good. The character builds options are deep and limitless. There's a shit load of content to like for Fallout fans. It's constantly updated with new stuff.

     

    I fail to see why you hate it so much other than being the trendy thing because the game had no content back during it's launch in 2018. 

     

    You're all clown Bethesda haters on this forum anyway. FO4 sucked, Skyrim sucked, Oblivion is the worst game ever. Lmao, bunch of try hard. Stick to Cyberjank, a game with a less advanced open world than 2003 Morrowind. 

  2. 5 minutes ago, JonDnD said:

    I played it for a bit recently. Couldnt get into it. I really liked FO4 so i was disappointed. Bethesda games map and compass also suck fucking ass. Hope SF doesnt have the same shit but it prob will

    I like it more than FO4 in a few ways. Real time VATS was a nice change of pace. Also, building one house for yourself that you can rebuild anywhere is better than having to build fucking shitty ass settlements all over the fucking map for dumb ass NPCs.

  3. Just now, Hot Sauce said:

     

    From the leaks during the Microsoft FTC trial we saw that Forbidden West cost $212-million to develop and Last of Us 2 cost $220-million. Forbidden West peaked at 300 full-time devs and Last of Us 2 at 200 full-time devs. Both had shorter development times that Starfield, too.

    Bethesda pays minimum wage. B) 

     

    Kidding aside, that's fucking nuts. 

  4. 57 minutes ago, JonDnD said:

    The premium tier is ROBBERY. What you get over extra is worthless. I got it just to download some demos. Yes, you have to pay to download demos which is a dick slapper to begin with. But it was good because it made me realize Sony games are the same tired shit. Sold my PS5 in the nick of time. Fuck Playstation. 

    Paying for demos. :pavarotti:  

  5. 38 minutes ago, JonDnD said:

    AAA games and games with a busy UI are AWFUL on phone sized screens. Tablet size makes it work but at that point get a laptop. These shits aint portable. Used to be able to put these in your pocket now you need a bookbag to carry these shits around.

     

    I tried a few games on my phone using Xcloud and im like yep cant even see this shit. It didnt make sense. 

    To be fair, laptops need to be plugged in, otherwise they're weak as shit and the battery runs out in a hour. 

  6. 1 minute ago, lynux3 said:

    No doubt! Can't forget about having to train people to fly these machines.

     

    Russia's AA is good enough to keep AFU far from the front line when they're doing their sorties. I am not entirely convince a fleet of F-16s will make a major difference, but I'd like to be wrong.

    It wouldn't guarantee some victory but it'll check Russian air forces, which are pretty much unchallenged on the frontline right now. It's a bit frustrating to see. 

  7. 1 minute ago, lynux3 said:

    Fuck the tank; lets compare it to an F-16, and that's a nearly 50 year old air frame that's still being produced today. From what I can see they cost around $30-35 million vs. $7-9 million for an M1 Abrams.

     

    Building cheap drones that can carry a decent size payload is definitely the way to go. I don't know how much they cost, but I see $100K being thrown around every once in a while.

    Training pilots is probably more costly and longer than tank crews though. 

     

    I know I come across as a Russian supporter but I've been crying for Ukraine to get air support for the longest time. This would allow the AFU to get rid of the Alligators with ease completely removing Russian air superiority. I doubt it will allow them to strike deep in Russian territories, like I said, AA weapons these days are really efficient, not sure about Russia's though. 

     

    • Upvote 1
  8. 4 hours ago, lynux3 said:


    :mj:

    You laugh but drones are the most efficient weapon for both sides. Followed by artillery and mines. I wish I was kidding. 

     

    This war is flipping conventions on it's head. Tanks are just easy prey for drones now, and are used mostly as mobile artillery or very small armored convoys compromised of like 3 units. They're too easy to spot with recon drones. 

     

    Also, too much AA automated missiles defense prevent Russian from entering too deep into Ukrainian territories from the air regardless of their air superiority. 

     

    Remove drones from Russian and they would have lost this conflict. I swear half of the confirmed visual kills I have seen were from kamikaze drones. The rest are artillery and mines. With perhaps alligator choppers in fourth place. 

  9. 19 hours ago, Twinblade said:

    Ukraine just performed their biggest Drone attack on Russia since the beginning of the war. Videos showing explosions are flooding twitter. Apparently they even managed to strike an airfield nearly 700km behind the frontline taking out multiple strategic bombers.

     

×
×
  • Create New...