Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Team 2019

The Official Whining thread - Keep your bitching about the injustices of the world in this thread

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Remij_ said:

Kill yourself then :hest: 

you should ask holyaxe man :snoop:

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

That dude should not have lost his seat. These wimin are seriously running rampant. Men are giving these hos too much power and they are going to regret this gender inequality!!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

They didnt even change them when they joined the EU.


1. The constitution forbids the building of Mosques.

2. You cannot serve in the army outside of conscription if you are Muslim. If you aren't Christian Orthodox you can't get an officer rank or position.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Cookester15 said:

it's their country, they can do what they want. No one tells Muslim countries what to do. 

woke :aitch: 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Aza Team 2019 said:

That's different. It's a Trump is going to get impeached any day now (for about a year) thread.

There’s a whining about social injustice thread.... thread moved. 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites




Why the Left Is Consumed With Hate

Lacking worthy menaces to fight, it is driven to find a replacement for racism. Failing this, what is left?
Shelby Steele


Protesters outside Trump Tower in New York the day after Election Day 2016. PHOTO: LIGHTROCKET VIA GETTY IMAGES

Even before President Trump’s election, hatred had begun to emerge on the American left—counterintuitively, as an assertion of guilelessness and moral superiority. At the Women’s March in Washington the weekend after Mr. Trump’s inauguration, the pop star Madonna said, “I have thought an awful lot of blowing up the White House.” Here hatred was a vanity, a braggadocio meant to signal her innocence of the sort of evil that, in her mind, the White House represented. (She later said the comment was “taken wildly out of context.”)

For many on the left a hateful anti-Americanism has become a self-congratulatory lifestyle. “America was never that great,” New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo recently said. For radical groups like Black Lives Matter, hatred of America is a theme of identity, a display of racial pride. 

For other leftists, hate is a license. Conservative speakers can be shouted down, even assaulted, on university campuses. Republican officials can be harassed in restaurants, in the street, in front of their homes. Certain leaders of the left—Rep. Maxine Waters comes to mind—are self-appointed practitioners of hate, urging their followers to think of hatred as power itself.

How did the American left—conceived to bring more compassion and justice to the world—become so given to hate? It began in the 1960s, when America finally accepted that slavery and segregation were profound moral failings. That acceptance changed America forever. It imposed a new moral imperative: America would have to show itself redeemed of these immoralities in order to stand as a legitimate democracy. 

The genius of the left in the ’60s was simply to perceive the new moral imperative, and then to identify itself with it. Thus the labor of redeeming the nation from its immoral past would fall on the left. This is how the left put itself in charge of America’s moral legitimacy. The left, not the right—not conservatism—would set the terms of this legitimacy and deliver America from shame to decency. 

This bestowed enormous political and cultural power on the American left, and led to the greatest array of government-sponsored social programs in history—at an expense, by some estimates, of more than $22 trillion. But for the left to wield this power, there had to be a great menace to fight against—a tenacious menace that kept America uncertain of its legitimacy, afraid for its good name.

This amounted to a formula for power: The greater the menace to the nation’s moral legitimacy, the more power redounded to the left. And the ’60s handed the left a laundry list of menaces to be defeated. If racism was necessarily at the top of the list, it was quickly followed by a litany of bigotries ending in “ism” and “phobia.” 

The left had important achievements. It did rescue America from an unsustainable moral illegitimacy. It also established the great menace of racism as America’s most intolerable disgrace. But the left’s success has plunged it into its greatest crisis since the ’60s. The Achilles’ heel of the left has been its dependence on menace for power. Think of all the things it can ask for in the name of fighting menaces like “systemic racism” and “structural inequality.” But what happens when the evils that menace us begin to fade, and then keep fading? 

It is undeniable that America has achieved since the ’60s one of the greatest moral evolutions ever. That is a profound problem for the left, whose existence is threatened by the diminishment of racial oppression. The left’s unspoken terror is that racism is no longer menacing enough to support its own power. The great crisis for the left today—the source of its angst and hatefulness—is its own encroaching obsolescence. Today the left looks to be slowly dying from lack of racial menace.

A single white-on-black shooting in Ferguson, Mo., four years ago resulted in a prolonged media blitz and the involvement of the president of the United States. In that same four-year period, thousands of black-on-black shootings took place in Chicago, hometown of the then-president, yet they inspired very little media coverage and no serious presidential commentary.

White-on-black shootings evoke America’s history of racism and so carry an iconic payload of menace. Black-on-black shootings carry no such payload, although they are truly menacing to the black community. They evoke only despair. And the left gets power from fighting white evil, not black despair. 

Today’s left lacks worthy menaces to fight. It is driven to find a replacement for racism, some sweeping historical wrongdoing that morally empowers those who oppose it. (Climate change?) Failing this, only hatred is left.

Hatred is a transformative power. It can make the innocuous into the menacing. So it has become a weapon of choice. The left has used hate to transform President Trump into a symbol of the new racism, not a flawed president but a systemic evil. And he must be opposed as one opposes racism, with a scorched-earth absolutism. 

For Martin Luther King Jr., hatred was not necessary as a means to power. The actual details of oppression were enough. Power came to him because he rejected hate as a method of resisting menace. He called on blacks not to be defined by what menaced them. Today, because menace provides moral empowerment, blacks and their ostensible allies indulge in it. The menace of black victimization becomes the unarguable truth of the black identity. And here we are again, forever victims. 

Yet the left is still stalked by obsolescence. There is simply not enough menace to service its demands for power. The voices that speak for the left have never been less convincing. It is hard for people to see the menace that drives millionaire football players to kneel before the flag. And then there is the failure of virtually every program the left has ever espoused—welfare, public housing, school busing, affirmative action, diversity programs, and so on.





Damn kudos WSJ! :melo:

Edited by Vini

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By dakur
      The documentary actually gives some interesting bits of info I wasn't aware of. Like I didn't think the rate of males victims of domestic violence was so high It actually raises a couple of good points about how males can be in disadvantage in today's society and the lack of support networks for males. It had much less feminist bashing than I was expecting It didn't perpetuate the talking points of pathetic groups like MGTOW Cassie Jaye is a babe  
      Cassie Jaye claims she started the documentary as a feminist but seems to be unaware that some of the issues raised by MRA are also raised by some feminist groups which makes me doubt that she was actually a feminist. Most of the "evidence" provided to support points comes from anecdotes and there's no effort to corroborate them with statistical data. (specially the ones regarding parental legal issues) The nasty side of MRA was mostly left out while the good side of feminist movements was also mostly left out. There is no effort to actually reconcile both movements which I think was a missed opportunity. It was more one-sided than it claimed. The perspective of other groups other than white people is completely missing  
      Has anyone seen this documentary? I just finished it and I thought it was interesting but flawed in its intention although not completely. It raises some interesting points about the lack of support males have with their issues and the legal disadvantages they can encounter in the US just for being males. But I think it mostly misses the point and focuses on going against the loud and crazy version of feminism that has taken over in the US and ignores that there's actually a part of feminism that has very similar concerns to the ones raised by the MRA.
      In the end I was surprised at how much the problems identified by the MRA can also be tackled from a feminist perspective. If only both groups talked to each other but they mostly just shout at each other.
  • Chatbox

    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More