Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
SheepKilla

Trump lawyers poised to "demolish" Democrats' legal arguments

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, jehurey said:

Yes it is proven.

 

Trump has even said it on the front lawn of the White House.

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/trump-publicly-urges-china-ukraine-investigate-bidens-amid-impeachment-inquiry-n1061956

 

On Video........in his own words. Confirming that he wanted that from Ukraine, and he wants other couintries to investigate Biden as well.

 

Now who am I going to believe........................YOU?????

 

...........or my lying ears and eyes?:mjgrin:

Him withholding aid is not proven as being tied to anything Biden related, that's not proven in any capacity whatsoever. Try to stay on point baby brain. 

 

Him publicly saying that other countries after the fact should investigate him also has nothing to do with anything, is completely unrelated and is not an aspect of the impeachment.

 

You're trying to blur lines between two different things as if one implicates the other as proof of something. You're nauseatingly fucking dumb. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, DynamiteCop! said:

Him withholding aid is not proven as being tied to anything Biden related, that's not proven in any capacity whatsoever.

 

Yes it is proven.

 

Multiple witnesses in the phone call.

 

Multiple diplomats in the Ukraine being told by Trump.

 

Multiple diplomats in the Ukraine being told by Trump's lawyer, Rudy Guliani.

 

Rudy Guliani's associate, Lev Parnas, specifically saying that it was all about the Bidens.

 

And Parnas saying that Trump was well aware the entire time.

 

Sweetie...............you can TRY REPEATING that there's no evidence all you want. You're not going to change the fact that there is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, jehurey said:

Yes it is proven.

 

Multiple witnesses in the phone call.

 

Multiple diplomats in the Ukraine being told by Trump.

 

Multiple diplomats in the Ukraine being told by Trump's lawyer, Rudy Guliani.

 

Rudy Guliani's associate, Lev Parnas, specifically saying that it was all about the Bidens.

 

And Parnas saying that Trump was well aware the entire time.

 

Sweetie...............you can TRY REPEATING that there's no evidence all you want. You're not going to change the fact that there is.

Nothing is proven whatsoever.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh by the way, Lev Parnas and his Lawyer just uploaded a 1 Hour, 20 minute video of him having dinner with Trump within the White House in 2018

 

Where the "take her out" story regarding Ukrainian Ambassador Maria Yovanuvich occurred in this very meeting.

 

Remember..........Trump says he doesn't know Lev Parnas. That's his official story.

 

Here's a video of him eating dinner for over an hour.

 

The part were he says to get rid of Yovanuvich occured at around 41m 09s mark. He is having that back and forth discussion DIRECTLY with Lev Parnas..........the man that Trump claims "he doesn't really know."

 

Dropbox download:

https://t.co/8GcE1MBBIQ?amp=1

Edited by jehurey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, DynamiteCop! said:

Nothing is proven whatsoever.

No it is sweetheart.

 

THis is what happens when your DELUSION is hitting a brick wall of reality.

 

You can block the audio and video out of your head.

 

But you can't block out of everybody elses.

 

There are witnesses.............there's nothing you can say that will dismiss these witnesses.

 

If you logic is based "EIGHT PEOPLE ARE LYING............AND THIS ONE GUY'S VERSION OF THE STORY IS THE TRUTH"

 

If that's what you're clinging on.................you've lost, son.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jehurey said:

Oh by the way, Lev Parnas and his Lawyer just uploaded a 1 Hour, 20 minute video of him having dinner with Trump within the White House in 2018

 

Where the "take her out" story regarding Ukrainian Ambassador Maria Yovanuvich occurred in this very meeting.

 

Remember..........Trump says he doesn't know Lev Parnas. That's his official story.

 

Here's a video of him eating dinner for over an hour.

 

The part were he says to get rid of Yovanuvich occured at around 41m 09s mark.

 

Dropbox download:

https://t.co/8GcE1MBBIQ?amp=1

I work with and see people every single day that I don't know. You morons are beyond reproach. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, DynamiteCop! said:

I work with and see people every single day that I don't know. You morons are beyond reproach. 

Sweetie...........you stretching your logic to stupid levels simply isn't working.

 

DO

you

think

 

Its convincing anybody?

 

Donald Trump is asking Lev Parnas about what is going on in Ukraine at the 41 minute mark. Parnas is literally the one who says that Yovanuvich is the one saying that Trump will be impeached soon. And Parnas recommends to get rid of her.

 

And Trump immediately repeats what Parnas says "Get her out" "Get rid of her", and he's saying that directly to Parnas.

 

Tell me..........would you have such a conversation like that with some "you don't know" ????????????

 

Who are you fooling, dude? Do you know how desperate you genuinely sound right now?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

youtube version.

 

 

Same video, but timestamped for the story that has broken out this past couple of days.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jehurey said:

Sweetie...........you stretching your logic to stupid levels simply isn't working.

 

DO

you

think

 

Its convincing anybody?

 

Donald Trump is asking Lev Parnas about what is going on in Ukraine at the 41 minute mark. Parnas is literally the one who says that Yovanuvich is the one saying that Trump will be impeached soon. And Parnas recommends to get rid of her.

 

And Trump immediately repeats what Parnas says "Get her out" "Get rid of her", and he's saying that directly to Parnas.

 

Tell me..........would you have such a conversation like that with some "you don't know" ????????????

 

Who are you fooling, dude? Do you know how desperate you genuinely sound right now?

Talking and interacting with someone also doesn't mean you know them, I can't even recount how many dinner parties I've been to with +1's and other people in attendance that I've discussed things with but wouldn't be able to recollect their faces, names, the conversations, anything. Also ambassadors are part of the executive branch which the President controls and can fire anyone for any reason at any time. 

 

It's pretty clear that she was talking poorly and touting impeachment behind his back while working under him, being a detractor and a remnant of the Clinton administration. She's not someone who should be working under his administration and is a negative influence so he told them to get rid of her. 

 

Where's the controversy? You people are hairbrained fucking wack jobs. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, DynamiteCop! said:

Talking and interacting with someone also doesn't mean you know them

When you meet with them several times, and have directly spoken with them several times, and are working with the same personal lawyer

 

Not an adminsitration or organization lawyer

Not from a team of lawyers

but your actual SINGLE lawyer that personally represents you that you've tasked with a specific job

 

................then yes you do know them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, jehurey said:

When you meet with them several times, and have directly spoken with them several times, and are working with the same personal lawyer

 

Not an adminsitration or organization lawyer

Not from a team of lawyers

but your actual SINGLE lawyer that personally represents you that you've tasked with a specific job

 

................then yes you do know them.

He interacts with thousands and thousands of people on a regular basis, invites he doesn't know, people under his administration he doesn't know, interactions that couldn't even be recollected. 

 

You guys think everything is devious in nature and it's getting really tiring and old, and it's leading to nothing yet again. Take your 20th L and just shut the fuck up, no one wants to hear anything from you faggots anymore.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, DynamiteCop! said:

He interacts with thousands and thousands of people on a regular basis, invites he doesn't know, people under his administration he doesn't know, interactions that couldn't even be recollected. 

 

You guys think everything is devious in nature and it's getting really tiring and old, and it's leading to nothing yet again. Take your 20th L and just shut the fuck up, no one wants to hear anything from you faggots anymore.

 

 

...........yet when he spoke to Parnas...........Trump asked him about what is going on in Ukraine.

 

How did Trump know that Parnas is.

 

1.) His man representing him in the Ukraine

2.) Is tasked with keeping tabs about what is going on in the Ukraine

 

??????????

 

If

he

supposedly

doesn't

know

him

 

Care to answer that one?:jasonj:

 

We can keep on going........you already know I'm going to paint you in a corner that you can't get out of.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, jehurey said:

...........yet when he spoke to Parnas...........Trump asked him about what is going on in Ukraine.

 

How did Trump know that Parnas is.

 

1.) His man representing him in the Ukraine

2.) Is tasked with keeping tabs about what is going on in the Ukraine

 

??????????

 

If

he

supposedly

doesn't

know

him

 

Care to answer that one?:jasonj:

 

We can keep on going........you already know I'm going to paint you in a corner that you can't get out of.

Pretty simple, because the whole table is having a conversation about Ukraine, he interjected and drew the attention to himself and his knowledge of the ambassador and how she's a problem, then someone else says "She'll be gone tomorrow" to which Trump says shortly after some other words "Get rid of her, get her out tomorrow, I don't care. Take her out". As a note there's absolutely zero reference as to who that statement is being directed to, and given the vocal positioning of Trump when he was talking to Parnas it would appear he's saying it to someone else likely to his right whereas Parnas is across the table, likely that someone else who said "She'll be gone tomorrow."

 

You're grasping at so many straws here my guy. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, DynamiteCop! said:

Pretty simple, because the whole table is having a conversation about Ukraine,

No they weren't. They were talking about Germany and Russia and energy costs and gas lines.

 

And Parnas says a remark about how there is a gas like involving the Ukraine.

 

And then Trump immediately says "so hows it going in the Ukraine"

 

Why would he direct that question if Parnas did not specify that he was working FROM Ukraine at no point in that conversation?

 

Its because he already knows that Parnas is working in the Ukraine beforehand.

.........because he knows Parnas is Guliani's guy.

 

And also............if he doesn't know him...........

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

why would he make a decision of firing his own Ukrainian ambassador based on hearsay from a complete stranger????

 

Did you forget that little tidbit?

Edited by jehurey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, jehurey said:

No they weren't. They were talking about Germany and Russia and energy costs and gas lines.

 

And Parnas says a remark about how there is a gas like involving the Ukraine.

 

And then Trump immediately says "so hows it going in the Ukraine"

 

Why would he direct that question if Parnas did not specify that he was working FROM Ukraine at no point in that conversation?

 

Its because he already knows that Parnas is working in the Ukraine beforehand.

.........because he knows Parnas is Guliani's guy.

 

And also............if he doesn't know him...........

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

why would he make a decision of firing his own Ukrainian ambassador based on hearsay from a complete stranger????

 

Did you forget that little tidbit?

Because he doesn't give a fuck, and he doesn't have to give a fuck. It's a private dinner and dude was no doubt in the company of someone he trusts likely the Ukrainian guy next to him, and If someone in that persons company says this is going on, that she's bad mouthing him, is from the Clinton administration and is clamoring about his impeachment he can fire her at will. He doesn't have to evaluate it, he doesn't need to investigate it, he doesn't need to waste time or money messing with it, that's more than enough to can her ass, this isn't a fucking union, son. 

 

Case closed. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, DynamiteCop! said:

Because he doesn't give a fuck, and he doesn't have to give a fuck.

 

Sorry.......that simply isn't a good enough reason.


Come up with a better one. You've run out of excuses, apparently.

 

How did he know Parnas worked in the Ukraine? You didn't answer that one either.

 

Parnas and Igor Fruman aren't even Ukrainian.......their Russian-born.  How did he know that they were working in the Ukraine??????????

 

Explain.

Edited by jehurey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jehurey said:

Sorry.......that simply isn't a good enough reason.


Come up with a better one. You've run out of excuses, apparently.

 

How did he know Parnas worked in the Ukraine? You didn't answer that one either.

 

Explain.

Was he not sitting next to and likely in the company of a Ukrainian which Trump did know? Could this person have introduced him as "This is my whatever guy in Ukraine" and so on and so forth?

 

Give it a rest, this whole shit show mess is going to be closed out next week, Trump is still going to be the President and you fags are going to have to go back to the drawing board to again make up some new horse shit while he's getting sworn in for a second term.

 

Give up, dreams dead Marx, the world is moving on without you. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, DynamiteCop! said:

Was he not sitting next to and likely in the company of a Ukrainian which Trump did know?

No.

 

The camera specifically goes by the seats and shows the name card of who is sitting there.

 

Its Igor Fruman and Lev Parnas............both Russian-born.

 

There is nobody else associated with the Ukraine, the rest of the people are just other guests that are related to Trump through Republican-networking, Donors, Business associates, suck-ups, etc.

 

Trump brings up the subject of Ukraine to the TWO PEOPLE that work with Rudy Guliani on that issue.

 

And Rudy Guliani ISN'T EVEN THERE............yet Trump still knew to ask Parnas about what is going on in the Ukraine.

 

:reg:C'mon, sweetie..........keep trying to argue that Trump doesn't know these people.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, jehurey said:

In other words...............you don't have a response to what I just posted, and the distinction that I clearly made.

 

Not only did the refuse to give lethal aid to Ukraine, they argued it would threaten US national security interests--the exact opposite position your Leftist masters are now arguing LOL!!!

 

9 hours ago, jehurey said:

You SPECIFICALLY SAID "Obama's decision was not about National Security"

 

You're back to lying to try and save face after getting destroyed as usual. :D

 

Once again for fun:

 

Not only did Obama and the Dems argue the US shouldn't give lethal aid to Ukraine, they justified it by saying it could threaten US national security--the exact opposite position they're arguing now. Utter phonies. 

 

:pavarotti::pavarotti::pavarotti::pavarotti::pavarotti::pavarotti::pavarotti::pavarotti::pavarotti::pavarotti::pavarotti::pavarotti::pavarotti::pavarotti::pavarotti::pavarotti:

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, jehurey said:

youtube version.

 

 

Same video, but timestamped for the story that has broken out this past couple of days.

 

I don't know this guy, I never met him :grimaceleft:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×