Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
jehurey

Adam Schiff on the floor of the Senate points out Trump's Lawyers contradicting Trump's DoJ regarding Impeachment on the same day.

Recommended Posts

The House Intelligence Committee has been taking the White House to court so that they can enforce subpoenas to get Trump's White House people to speak.

 

So the are lawyers for the House Intelligence Committee in a Washington federal court, and defending Trump's side is the Dept. of Justice. They are saying that they don't have the right to come to a Judicial court petition the court to enforce those subpoenas.

 

And so the judge says, "well, if the House has the right to subpoena, but they aren't allowed to have a court to ENFORCE these subpoenas, then what recourse does the House have in this situation?"

 

And Trump's own Dept. of Justice says "well, they could Impeach the President"

 

That happened TODAY in a separate courtroom.

 

At the same time, on the floor of the Senate. Trump's legal defense team against Impeachment............is saying that Trump isn't doing anything impeachable in the first place.

 

Even though Trump's very own DoJ just said that he's doing stuff that qualifies as Impeachable, right now.

 

Adam Schiff catches this................historically ridiculous...............contradiction and points this out on the Senate floor. The Senators even laugh.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The subpoenas had no legal merit because the inquiry was not voted on rendering them invalid. Nothing was ignored after the vote took place, merely before it was. 

 

Again you losers have nothing. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The right doesn’t care about the truth. They’re all in on it. They’re traitors to the country and freedom. They want to coronate a king. 

Edited by Ike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, DynamiteCop! said:

The subpoenas had no legal merit because the inquiry was not voted on rendering them invalid. Nothing was ignored after the vote took place, merely before it was. 

 

Again you losers have nothing. 

No, they were voted on by the House Intelligence Committee. They're valid.

 

Sorry, try again.

 

Whatever right-wing twitter account you're using to get your retorts......find better people to parrot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, DynamiteCop! said:

The subpoenas had no legal merit because the inquiry was not voted on rendering them invalid. Nothing was ignored after the vote took place, merely before it was. 

 

Again you losers have nothing. 

Lmfao at this MAGAT. Republicans are the worst. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2020-01-31 at 1:00 AM, Ike said:

The right doesn’t care about the truth. They’re all in on it. They’re traitors to the country and freedom. They want to coronate a king. 

It's funny how you artificially cultivate outrage just because you hate Trump. Obama did 500x worse than a phone call. But now suddenly you're all moral warriors seeking to do what's right by impeaching trump? 

 

OK. :D 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, SheepKilla said:

It's funny how you artificially cultivate outrage just because you hate Trump. Obama did 500x worse than a phone call. But now suddenly you're all moral warriors seeking to do what's right by impeaching trump? 

 

OK. :D 

This fool still thinks it was simply a phone call that was the issue:mj:

 

 

That's like someone admitting to a crime on the phone... and then retards like SheepKilla think it was that call that was the actual crime and not the acts described on the call :grimaceleft:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, Goukosan said:

This fool still thinks it was simply a phone call that was the issue:mj:

 

 

That's like someone admitting to a crime on the phone... and then retards like SheepKilla think it was that call that was the actual crime and not the acts described on the call :grimaceleft:

he demanded that someone ELSE be investigated for crimes.  

 

So his crime is literally investigating crime. 

 

Did he say he will withold aid unless Ukraine's president imprisons Biden? No. He said he will withold aid unless they merely INVESTIGATE.

 

you are against the simple INVESTIGATION of crimes. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, SheepKilla said:

It's funny how you artificially cultivate outrage just because you hate Trump. Obama did 500x worse than a phone call. But now suddenly you're all moral warriors seeking to do what's right by impeaching trump? 

 

OK. :D 

Really?

 

What did Obama do worse? Explain.

 

I'll wait.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, SheepKilla said:

he demanded that someone ELSE be investigated for crimes.  

 

So his crime is literally investigating crime. 

 

Did he say he will withold aid unless Ukraine's president imprisons Biden? No. He said he will withold aid unless they merely INVESTIGATE.

 

you are against the simple INVESTIGATION of crimes. 

No...........he demanded that a fake investigation be announced out of thin air.........for his opponent in the upcoming election.

 

.........to PERSONALLY help his chances of winning that re-election.

 

There was no reason to investigate.

 

He wanted to CREATE the appearance of dirt in order to SPECULATE AND SAY that there is dirt.

 

This is ironic................because you're complaining that the Democrats shouldn't investigate Trump, but you're saying that "investigations are a good thing"

 

So you would approve of Democrats MERELY OPEN UP MORE INVESTIGATIONS into Trump..............right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, jehurey said:

Really?

 

What did Obama do worse? Explain.

 

I'll wait.

Spied on Trump campaign and then claimed he didn't, until proof came out he did months later. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, SheepKilla said:

Spied on Trump campaign and then claimed he didn't, until proof came out he did months later. 

You mean all those Trump campaign officials who are currently locked up for illegal activities.  :tom5:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Goukosan said:

You mean all those Trump campaign officials who are currently locked up for illegal activities.  :tom5:

I said "months later," not "years later"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, SheepKilla said:

I said "months later," not "years later"

There was no "spying" retard Trump made it all up 

 

Trump even made the DOJ look into it and they found nothing. 

 

"The Justice Department's inspector general found no evidence to support President Donald Trump's claim that the FBI inserted spies in his 2016 presidential campaign" :drake:

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Goukosan said:

There was no "spying" retard Trump made it all up 

 

Trump even made the DOJ look into it and they found nothing. 

 

"The Justice Department's inspector general found no evidence to support President Donald Trump's claim that the FBI inserted spies in his 2016 presidential campaign" :drake:

 

 

 

Not spies, retard. Wiretapping his phones. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, SheepKilla said:

Not spies, retard. Wiretapping his phones. 

 

 

4 hours ago, SheepKilla said:

Spied on Trump campaign and then claimed he didn't, until proof came out he did months later. 

 

 

"The Justice Department's inspector general found no evidence to support President Donald Trump's claim that the FBI inserted spies in his 2016 presidential campaign"

 

 

:tom5:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Goukosan said:

 

 

 

"The Justice Department's inspector general found no evidence to support President Donald Trump's claim that the FBI inserted spies in his 2016 presidential campaign"

 

 

:tom5:

You're being purposefully obtuse. 

 

:pffft:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, DynamiteCop! said:

You're being purposefully obtuse. 

 

:pffft:

A more ironic post has ever been made :sabu:

Edited by Goukosan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×